Nerve Repair in Telemicrosurgery: An Experimental Study

ABSTRACT

Since the development of microsurgery in the 1960s, the prognosis of peripheral nerve lesions has greatly improved. However this new technique's evolution has remained limited by human factors, in particular by physiological tremor. Telesurgery, a technique used in other surgical fields, was developed in the 1990s. This study assesses the feasibility of peripheral nerve repair using telemicrosurgery. Anatomical material from three subjects of different species (rat, pig, and human) was used. The telesurgical step of the procedure was performed with a Da Vinci S robot (Intuitive Surgical, Inc., Sunnyvale, CA). Four anatomical epiperineural repairs were performed. Another neurotrophic repair was performed with a nerve regrowth guide. Regardless of the type of repair performed, the telemanipulator removed the physiological tremor factor. The suture needle was distorted when held by two clamps at a time. Repairs were all performed without any damaging twisting movements of both nerve ends. Our results demonstrated that telesurgery allows very safe and precise peripheral nerve repairs by counteracting physiological tremor and by improving the overview of the surgical field, either with an anatomical or a neurotrophic technique.

KEYWORDS

Anastomosis - microsurgery - nerve - robot - telesurgery

REFERENCES

• 1 Bourrel P, Ferro R M, Lorthior J M. Epiperineural nerve sutures and neurolemmatic sutures. Comparative clinical results of about 109 cases.  Sem Hop Paris. 1981;  57 2015-2023
• 2 Williams L R, Longo F M, Powell H C, Lundborg G, Varon S. Spatial-temporal progress of peripheral nerve regeneration within a silicone chamber: parameters for a bioassay.  J Comp Neurol. 1983;  218 460-470
• 3 Pande R U, Patel Y, Powers C J, D'Ancona G, Karamanoukian H L. The telecommunication revolution in the medical field: present applications and future perspective.  Curr Surg. 2003;  60 636-640
• 4 Marescaux J, Leroy J, Gagner M, Rubino F, Mutter D, Vix M. Transatlantic robot-assisted telesurgery.  Nature. 2001;  413 379-380
• 5 Bressler L R. Place de l'assistance robotique par le système Da Vinci en chirurgie digestive et endocrinienne.  Ann Chir. 2006;  131 299-301
• 6 Zorn K C. Robotic radical prostatectomy learning curve of a fellowship-trained laparoscopic surgeon.  J Endourol. 2007;  21 441-447
• 7 Cohn L H. Futures directions in cardiac surgery.  Am Heart Hosp J. 2006;  4 174-178
• 8 Taleb C, Nectoux E, Liverneaux P. Telemicrosurgery: a feasibility study in a rat model.  Chir Main. 2008;  27 104-108
• 9 Katz R D, Rosson G D, Taylor J A, Singh N K. Robotics in microsurgery: use of a surgical robot to perform a free flap in a pig.  Microsurgery. 2005;  25 566-569
• 10 Van der Hulst R. Microvascular anastomosis: is there a role for robotic surgery?.  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;  60 101-102
• 11 Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadière G B, Nyssen A S. Perceptual and instrumental impacts of robotic laparoscopy on surgical performance.  Surg Endosc. 2007;  21 1875-1882
• 12 Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadière G B, Nyssen A S. Impact of 2D and 3D vision on performance of novice subjects using Da Vinci robotic system.  Acta Chir Belg. 2006;  106 662-664
• 13 Bertleff M J, Meek M F, Nicolai J P. A prospective clinical evaluation of biodegradable Neurolac nerve guides for sensory nerve repair in the hand.  J Hand Surg [Am]. 2005;  30 513-518
• 14 Smith A, Smith J, Jayne D G. Telerobotics: surgery for the 21st century.  Surgery. 2006;  24 74-78
• 15 Blavier A, Gaudissart Q, Cadière G B, Nyssen A S. Impact of 2D and 3D vision on performance of novice subjects using Da Vinci robotic system.  Acta Chir Belg. 2006;  106 662-664
• 16 Nelson B. Comparison of length of hospital stay between radical retropubic prostatectomy and robotic assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.  J Urol. 2007;  177 929-931