Comparison of standard endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) versus an optimized ESD technique for the colon: an animal study

Background and study aims: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a promising therapeutic technique for en bloc resection of large gastrointestinal tumors. However, this technique has disadvantages such as a long intervention time, complexity of the procedure, and a higher rate of complications. The primary aims of the study were to show the feasibility of ESD in the pig colon and to evaluate a new ESD technique comprising the use of a newly developed hybrid knife for colon procedures combining RF (radiofrequency) application and a distance-dependent water-jet application.

Materials and methods: ESD was conducted at three different locations in the colon according to the computer-generated randomization list, using either the standard technique (injection needle, flex knife, and hook knife as therapeutic instruments and DRY CUT and SWIFT COAG as RF currents), or the new ESD technique (hybrid knife as the therapeutic instrument combined with the new cutting mode ENDO CUT D) in 12 healthy pigs. The perforation and bleeding rates were documented and statistically analyzed. Intervention time, resected specimen size, thermal and mechanical damage of the resection bed, and number of instrument changes required were also recorded.

Results: A total of 16 and 18 ESD procedures were performed by the standard and new techniques, respectively. Complete en bloc resection was achieved in all cases. The standard ESD technique showed a perforation rate of 25 % (4/16) whereas the new ESD technique resulted in a 5.5 % perforation rate (1/18) (P = 0.035); bleeding rates were similar. The new ESD technique was significantly safer compared with the standard ESD technique.

Conclusions: A new ESD technique for the successful en bloc resection in thin-walled regions such as pig colon has been described. This procedure is as effective as the standard procedure but is easier to handle and significantly safer.

References

• 1 Yahagi N, Fujishiro M, Kakushima N. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer using the tip of an electrosurgical snare (thin type).  Dig Endosc. 2004;  16 34-38
• 2 Gotoda T. A large endoscopic resection by endoscopic submucosal dissection procedure for early gastric cancer.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2005;  3 S71-S73
• 3 Tamegai Y, Saito Y, Masaki N. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection: a safe technique for colorectal tumors.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 418-422
• 4 Goulet C, DiSario J A, Emerson L. et al . In vivo evaluation of argon plasma coagulation in a porcine model.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 457-462
• 5 Haber H P, Benda N, Fritzke G. et al . Colonic wall thickness measured by ultrasound: striking differences in patients with cystic fibrosis versus healthy control.  Gut. 1997;  40 406-411
• 6 Fisher J K. Normal colon wall thickness on CT.  Radiology. 1982;  145 415-418
• 7 Yahagi N, Fujishiro M, Imagawa A. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for the reliable en bloc resection of colorectal mucosal tumors.  Dig Endosc. 2004;  16 S89-S92
• 8 Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N. et al . Outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal epithelial neoplasms in 200 consecutive cases.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  5 678-683
• 9 Tanaka S, Oka S, Kaneko I. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal neoplasia: possibility of standardization.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 100-107
• 10 Saito Y, Uraoka T, Matsuda T. et al . Endoscopic treatment of large superficial colorectal tumors: a case series of 200 endoscopic submucosal dissections.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 966-973
• 11 Yamamoto H, Yahagi N, Oyama T. Mucosectomy in the colon with endoscopic submucosal dissection.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 764-768
• 12 Yahagi N, Fujishiro M, Omata M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for colorectal lesions using flex knife.  Acta Endoscopica. 2007;  37 665-672
• 13 Schumacher B, Neuhaus H, Enderle M D. Experimental use of a new device for mucosectomy.  Acta Endoscopica. 2007;  37 673-678
• 14 Schumacher B. Endoluminal therapy of adenoma and early stomach cancer.  Endosk heute. 2007;  20 236-240
• 15 Schumacher B, Deinert K, Neuhaus H. et al . Experimental testing of a new hybrid-knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB278
• 16 Fujishiro M. Endoscopic submucosal dissection for stomach neoplasms.  World J Gastroenterol. 2006;  12 5108-5112
• 17 Fujishiro M, Yahagi N, Kakushima N. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection of esophageal squamous cell neoplasms.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;  4 688-694
• 18 Williams E J, Taylor S, Fairclough P. et al . Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 793-801
• 19 Toyonaga T, Nishino E, Dozaiku T. et al . Risk management in endoscopic submucosal dissection in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Management to prevent bleeding during endoscopic submucosal dissection using the flush knife for gastric tumors.  Dig Endosc. 2007;  19 S14-S18