Conservative Management of Major Abdominal Wound Dehiscence in Premature Babies – A Seven-year Experience

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to analyse our experience of managing complete abdominal wound dehiscence in preterm neonates non operatively, when primary closure was not possible. We used intrasite gel (a carboxymethyl cellulose polymer which helps in wound debridement and healing) and occlusive duoderme dressings.

Materials and Methods: There were seven neonates who developed abdominal dehiscence following laparotomy between January 2000 and December 2006. All had complete abdominal dehiscence with visible intestines. The defect was allowed to granulate and epithelialise by the application of intrasite gel and duoderme dressings. Dressings were changed every 3 days, or earlier, if necessary.

Results: All babies responded well, i.e. their wounds healed without the need for immediate surgery. One patient actually had a stoma in the middle of the wound which was managed with stoma bags during the same period. The period of total epithelialisation ranged from 21 to 108 days. Two patients developed adhesive intestinal obstruction requiring surgery, at 2 and 3 months after the start of treatment. On follow-up, 2/7 patients had developed an incisional hernia.

Conclusion: Abdominal wound dehiscence can be successfully managed conservatively with intrasite gel and duoderme dressings, even if bowel is visible. This is potentially lifesaving in severely premature and septic babies in whom primary closure is not desirable. However, some patients do develop adhesive intestinal obstruction or a faecal fistula, either as a result of their primary illness or of this treatment. We believe that this series is the first of its kind to be reported in the world literature.

Key words

neonate - abdominal - dehiscence - intrasite - prematurity

References

• 1 Agren MS. An amorphous hydrogel enhances epithelialization of wounds.  Acta Derm Venereol. 1998;  78 ((2)) 119-122
• 2 Blakely ML, Lally KP, MacDonald S. et al . Postoperative outcomes of extremely low birth-weight Infants with necrotizig enterocolitis or isolated intestinal perforation. A prospective cohort study by the NICHD neonatal research network.  Ann of Surgery. 2005;  241 984-994
• 3 Cigdem MK, Onen A, Otcus S, Duran H. Post operative abdominal wound evisceration in children: possible risk factors.  Pediatr Surg Int. 2006;  22 ((8)) 677-680
• 4 Doughty DB. Preventing and managing surgical wound dehiscence.  Adv Skin Wound Care. 2005;  18 ((6)) 319-322
• 5 Fry MM. A frame work for wound management.  Nursing Standard. 1993;  7 ((28)) 29-32
• 6 Gates JL, Holloway GA. A comparison of wound environments.  Ostomy Wound Manage. 1992;  38 ((8)) 34-37
• 7 Hermans MHE. Duoderme in the treatment of donor sites: A report.  Ann MBC. 1990;  3 ((3)) 11-15
• 8 Jones S. Neonatal wound dehiscence and the subsequent healing process: a case study.  Ostomy Wound Manage. 2000;  46 ((6)) , 42–45 48-50
• 9 Lewis R, Whiting P, ter Riet G. et al . A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of debriding agents in treating surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.  Health Technol Assess. 2001;  5 ((14)) 1-131
• 10 Vernon T. Intrasite Gel and Intrasite Conformable: the hydrogel range.  Br J Nurs. 2000;  9 ((16)) , 14–27 1083-1088

Correspondence