Speech-Language Pathologists as Primary Contributors to Response to Intervention at the Secondary Level

ABSTRACT

Response to intervention (RTI) is currently receiving attention at the middle and high school levels. Although many academic and behavioral needs in secondary schools may warrant an RTI initiative, lack of literacy skills in adolescents is among the most important because language and literacy are foundational to curriculum learning. Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) have much to offer secondary RTI initiatives, given their expertise in language and literacy. Therefore, they need to become primary contributors. This article addresses several important conditions necessary to bring SLPs into the forefront with RTI at the secondary level by discussing (1) having a common understanding of RTI that is being implemented differently across the country; (2) understanding the rationale for adopting RTI at the secondary level; (3) defining unique contributions of SLPs that add value to RTI initiatives in middle and high schools; (4) exploring what it takes for SLPs to become involved, including attention to curriculum and literacy, changing the perceptions of others regarding the roles of SLPs, restructuring of delivery models, and replacing a caseload approach to service delivery with a workload approach; (5) establishing productive working relationships among professionals in secondary schools; and (6) exerting leadership to move forward in RTI involvement.

KEYWORDS

Response to intervention - secondary education - speech-language pathologists - secondary RTI - adolescent literacy

REFERENCES

• 1 Graner P S, Faggella-Luby M N, Fritschmann N S. An overview of responsiveness to intervention: what practitioners ought to know.  Top Lang Disord. 2005;  25(2) 93-105
• 2 Hughes C, Dexter D. Field studies of RTI programs. RTI Action Network; 2008. Available at: http://www.rtinetwork.org/Learn/Research/ar/FieldStudies Accessed March 2, 2009
• 3 Arnberger K, Shoop R. Responding to need.  Principal Leadership. 2008;  8(5) 50-54
• 4 Burns M. Response to intervention at the secondary level.  Principal Leadership: Middle School Ed. 2008;  8(7) 12-15
• 5 Canter A, Klotz M, Cowan K. Response to intervention: The future for secondary schools.  Principal Leadership: Middle School Ed. 2008;  8(6) 12-15
• 6 Duffy H. Meeting the Needs of Significantly Struggling Learners in High School: A Look at Approaches to Tiered Intervention. Washington, DC; National High School Center 2007
• 7 Ehren B J. Response to intervention in secondary schools: Is it on your radar screen? RTI Action Network; 2008. Available at: http://www.rtinetwork.org/Learn/Why/ar/RadarScreen Accessed October 2, 2008
• 8 Johnson E, Smith L. Implementation of response to intervention at middle school: challenges and potential benefits.  Except Child. 2008;  40(3) 46-52
• 9 Ehren B J, Nelson N W. Identification of language impairment within the responsiveness to intervention approach. In: The 56th Annual Conference Commemorative Booklet. Proceedings of International Dyslexia Association Conference 2005: 23-27 Baltimore, MD;
• 10 Troia G. Responsiveness to intervention: roles for speech-language pathologists in the prevention and identification of learning disabilities.  Top Lang Disord. 2005;  25(2) 106-119
• 11 Ehren T, Whitmire K. Leadership opportunities in the context of responsiveness to intervention activities.  Top Lang Disord. 2005;  25(2) 168-179
• 12 Kurns S, Tilly W D. Response to intervention blueprints: school building level edition. Alexandria, VA: The National Association of State Directors of Special Education (NASDSE); 2008. Available at: http://www.nasdse.org/Portals/0/SCHOOL.pdf Accessed July 7, 2007
• 13 National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities .Responsiveness to intervention and learning disabilities; 2005. Available at: http://www.ldonline.org/njcld Accessed December 27, 2008
• 14 National Center for Learning Disabilities RTI Action Network Position Statement on RTI .RTI Action Network; 2008. Available at: http://www.rtinetwork.org/About/Position Accessed March 2, 2009
• 15 Mellard D, Johnson E. RTI: A Practitioner's Guide to Implementing Response to Intervention. Thousand Oaks, CA; Corwin Press 2008
• 16 Hughes C, Dexter D. Field Studies of RTI Programs. RTI Action Network. Available at: http://www.rtinetwork.org/Learn/Research/ar/FieldStudies Accessed December 15, 2008
• 17 VanDerHeyden A M, Snyder P A, Broussard C, Ramsdell K. Measuring response to early literacy intervention with preschoolers at risk.  Top Early Child Spec Educ. 2008;  27 232-249
• 18 Recognition and Response .Recognition and Response: An Early Intervening System for Young Children At-Risk for Learning Disabilities. Available at: http://www.recognitionandresponse.org/images/downloads/2006fpgsynthesis_recognitionandresponse.pdf Accessed December 15, 2008
• 19 Windram H, Scierka B, Silberglitt B. Response to intervention at the secondary level: two districts' models of implementation.  Communique. 2007;  35 43-45
• 20 Fairbanks S, Sugai G, Guardino D, Lathrop M. Response to intervention: examining classroom behavior support in second grade.  Except Child. 2007;  73 288-310
• 21 Sugai G, Horner R H, Dunlap G et al.. Applying positive behavior support and functional assessment in schools.  J Posit Behav Interv. 2000;  2 131-143
• 22 Kovaleski J F, Gickling E E, Morrow H, Swank H. High versus low implementation of instructional support teams: a case for maintaining program fidelity.  Remedial Spec Educ. 1999;  20 170-183
• 23 Ardoin S P, Witt J C, Connell J E, Koenig J L. Application of a three-tiered response to intervention model for instructional planning, decision making, and the identification of children in need of services.  J Psychoed Assess. 2005;  23 362-380
• 24 Fuchs L S, Fuchs D, Prentice K. Responsiveness to mathematical problem-solving instruction: comparing students at risk of mathematics disability with and without risk of reading disability.  J Learn Disabil. 2004;  37 293-306
• 25 Linan-Thompson S, Vaughn S, Prater K, Cirino P. The response to intervention of English language learners at-risk for reading problems.  J Learn Disabil. 2006;  39 390-398
• 26 Fletcher J. Identifying learning disabilities in the context of response to intervention: a hybrid model. RTI Action Network. Available at: http://www.rtinetwork.org/Learn/LD/ar/HybridModel Accessed December 15, 2008
• 27 Marston D, Muyskens P, Lau M, Canter A. Problem-solving model for decision making with high-incidence disabilities: the Minneapolis experience.  Learn Disabil Res Pract. 2003;  18 187-200
• 28 Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004. Pub L No. 108–446, §§ 1400 et seq
• 29 Shapiro E. Tiered instruction and intervention in a response-to-intervention model. RTI Action Network; 2008. Available at: http://www.rtinetwork.org/Essential/TieredInstruction/ar/ServiceDelivery/1
• 30 Johnson E, Mellard D F, Fuchs D, McKnight M A. Responsiveness to Intervention (RTI): How to Do It. Lawrence, KS: National Research Center on Learning Disabilities; 2006. Available at: http://www.nrcld.org/rti_manual/index.html Accessed March 1, 2008
• 31 Ehren B, Ehren T, Proly J. Response to Intervention: An Action Guide for School Leaders. Alexandria, VA; ERS 2009
• 32 No Child Left Behind Act of 2001. Pub L No. 107–110
• 33 National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities .Adolescent literacy and older students with learning disabilities; 2008. Available at: http://www.ldonline.org/njcld Accessed December 27, 2008
• 34 Lee J, Grigg W, Donahue P. The Nation's Report Card: Reading 2007 (NCES 2007–496). Washington, DC; National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education 2007
• 35 Biancarosa C, Snow C E. Reading Next—A Vision for Action and Research in Middle and High School Literacy: A Report to Carnegie Corporation of New York. 2nd ed. Washington, DC; Alliance for Excellent Education 2006
• 36 Perfetti C, Landi N, Oakhill J. The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In: Snowling M, Hulme C The Science of Reading. Maiden, MA; Blackwell 2005: 227-248
• 37 Ehren B, Montgomery J, Rudebusch J, Whitmire K. Responsiveness to intervention: new roles for speech-language pathologists. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2006. http://Available at: www.asha.org/members/slp/schools/prof-consult/NewRolesSLP.htm Accessed May 4, 2007
• 38 Catts H W, Kamhi A G. Language and Reading Disabilities. 2nd ed. Boston, MA; Allyn & Bacon 2005
• 39 Catts H W, Fey M E, Zhang X, Tomblin J B. Language basis of reading disabilities: evidence from a longitudinal investigation.  Sci Stud Read. 1999;  3 331-361
• 40 Nation K, Clarke P, Marshall C, Durand M. Hidden language impairments in children: parallels between poor reading comprehension and specific language impairment?.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004;  47 199-211
• 41 Torgesen J K. The prevention of reading difficulties.  J Sch Psychol. 2002;  40(1) 7-26
• 42 Bishop D V, Adams C. A prospective study of the relationship between specific language impairment, phonological disorders and reading retardation.  J Child Psychol Psychiatr. 1990;  31 1027-1050
• 43 Catts H W. The relationship between speech language impairments and reading disabilities.  J Speech Hear Res. 1993;  36 948-958
• 44 Scarborough H S, Dobrich W. Development of children with early language delay.  J Speech Hear Res. 1990;  33 70-83
• 45 Silva P A, McGree R, Williams S M. Developmental language delay from three to seven years and its significance for low intelligence and reading difficulties at age seven.  Dev Med Child Neurol. 1983;  25 783-793
• 46 Stothard S E, Snowling M J, Bishop D V, Chipchase B B, Kaplan C A. Language-impaired preschoolers: a follow-up into adolescence.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;  41 407-418
• 47 Tallal P, Curtiss S, Kaplan R. The San Diego Longitudinal Study: Evaluating the Outcomes of Preschool Impairment in Language Development. Final Report. Washington, DC: National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Diseases and Stroke 1989
• 48 American Speech-Language Hearing Association .Knowledge and Skills Needed by SLPs with Respect to Reading and Writing in Children and Adolescents. ASHA 2002 Desk Reference. Rockville, MD; American Speech-Language Hearing Association 2002
• 49 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association .Roles and Responsibilities of Speech-Language Pathologists with Respect to Reading and Writing in Children and Adolescents [guidelines]. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2001. Available at: http://www.asha.org/policy Accessed March 2, 2009
• 50 American Speech-Language-Hearing Association .Roles and responsibilities of speech-language pathologists with respect to reading and writing in children and adolescents [position statement]. American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2001. Available at: http://www.asha.org/policy Accessed March 2, 2009
• 51 Ehren B J. Responsiveness to intervention: an opportunity to reinvent speech-language services in schools.  The ASHA Leader. 2007;  12(13) 10-12
• 52 Gruenewald L J, Pollak S. Language Intervention in the Curriculum and Instruction. 2nd ed. Austin, TX; PRO-ED 1990
• 53 Nelson N. Curriculum based language assessment and intervention.  Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 1989;  20 170-184
• 54 Prelock P, Miller B, Reed N. Working with the Classroom Curriculum: A Guide for Analysis and Use in Speech Therapy. San Antonio, TX; Communication Skill Builders 1993
• 55 Ehren B J. Workload and RTI: Living happily ever after. Paper presented at: ASHA Schools Conference 2008 Orlando, FL;
• 56 Wallach G P, Ehren B J. Collaborative models of instruction and intervention: choices, decisions, and implementation. In: Silliman ER, Wilkinson LC Language and Literacy Learning in Schools. New York, NY; Guilford Press 2004: 39-59
• 57 Ehren B J. Speech-language pathologists contributing significantly to the academic success of high school students: a vision for professional growth.  Top Lang Disord. 2002;  22(2) 60-80
• 58 Ehren B J, Lenz B K, Deshler D D. Enhancing literacy proficiency with adolescents and young adults. In: Stone A, Silliman E, Ehren B, Apel K Handbook of Language and Literacy. New York, NY; Guilford Press 2004