Download PDF
Synthesis 2009(14): 2418-2422  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1216855
PAPER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Concise Total Synthesis of (+)-Disparlure and its trans-Isomer Using Asymmetric Organocatalysis

Sung-Gon Kim*
Department of Chemistry, College of Natural Science, Kyonggi University, San 94-6, Iui-dong, Yeongtong-gu, Suwon 443-760, Korea
Fax: +82(31)2499631; e-Mail: sgkim123@kgu.ac.kr;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 25 February 2009
Publication Date:
29 May 2009 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

The efficient enantioselective synthesis of (+)-disparlure and its trans-isomer is described. This approach involves tandem asymmetric organocatalytic α-aminoxylation-allylation of an aldehyde and olefin cross metathesis using Grubbs’ catalyst as key steps.

Key words

disparlure - total synthesis - organocatalysis - asymmetric synthesis - olefin cross metathesis

    References

  • 1 Bierl BA. Beroza M. Collier CW. Science  1970,  170:  87 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Miller JR. Mori K. Roelofs WL. J. Insect Physiol.  1977,  23:  1447 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Pettner E. Lazar J. Prestwich EG. Prestwich GD. Biochemistry  2000,  39:  8953 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • For reviews, see:
  • 4a Mori K. Tashiro T. Curr. Org. Synth.  2004,  1:  11 
    Google Scholar
  • 4b Mori K. Acc. Chem. Res.  2000,  33:  102 
    Google Scholar
  • For recent syntheses of disparlure, see:
  • 5a Prasad KR. Anbarasan P. J. Org. Chem.  2007,  72:  3155 
    Google Scholar
  • 5b Koumbis AE. Chronopoulos DD. Tetrahedron Lett.  2005,  46:  3453 
    Google Scholar
  • 5c Marshall JA. Jablonowski JA. Jiang H. J. Org. Chem.  1999,  64:  2152 
    Google Scholar
  • 5d Hu S. Jayaraman S. Oehlschlager AC. J. Org. Chem.  1999,  64:  3719 
    Google Scholar
  • 5e Tsuboi S. Yamafuji N. Utaka M. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  1997,  8:  375 
    Google Scholar
  • 5f Li LH. Wang D. Chan TH. Tetrahedron Lett.  1997,  38:  101 
    Google Scholar
  • 5g Sinha-Bagchi A. Sinha SC. Keinan E. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  1995,  6:  2889 
    Google Scholar
  • 5h Paolucci C. Mazzini C. Fava A. J. Org. Chem.  1995,  60:  169 
    Google Scholar
  • 5i Ko SY. Tetrahedron Lett.  1994,  35:  3601 
    Google Scholar
  • 5j Tsuboi S. Furutani H. Ansari MH. Sakai T. Utaka M. Takeda A. J. Org. Chem.  1993,  58:  486 
    Google Scholar
  • 5k Brevet J.-L. Mori K. Synthesis  1992,  1007 
    Google Scholar
  • 5l Keinan E. Sinha SC. Sinha-Bagchi A. Wang Z.-M. Zhang X.-L. Sharpless KB. Tetrahedron Lett.  1992,  33:  6411 
    Google Scholar
  • 6a Kim S.-G. Park T.-H. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry  2008,  19:  1626 
    Google Scholar
  • 6b Kim S.-G. Park T.-H. Kim BJ. Tetrahedron Lett.  2006,  47:  6369 
    Google Scholar
  • 6c Kim S.-G. Kim J. Jung H. Tetrahedron Lett.  2005,  46:  2437 
    Google Scholar
  • 6d For a review on total synthesis based on asymmetric organocatalysis, see: de Figueiredo RM. Christmann M. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2007,  2575 
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Zhong G. Chem. Commun.  2004,  606 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • For selected examples of proline-catalyzed asymmetric α-aminoxylation of aldehydes, see:
  • 8a Brown SP. Brochu MP. Sinz CJ. MacMillan DWC. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2003,  125:  10808 
    Google Scholar
  • 8b Zhong G. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2003,  42:  4247 
    Google Scholar
  • 8c Hayashi Y. Yamaguchi J. Hibino K. Shoji M. Tetrahedron Lett.  2003,  44:  8293 
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Even in the case of the use of only DMSO as solvent, the major product was the anti-isomer with 4:1 (anti/syn) diastereoselectivity, similar to the result with the CHCl3-DMSO cosolvent system. From this, we deduce that the reversal of selectivity compared with previous results6b,7 (2:3, anti/syn, in our cases) comes from the use of different aldehyde substrates, not a solvent effect. The major isomer could be inverted according to the substrates used in the indium-mediated allylation of α-oxygenated aldehydes; see: Paquette LA. Mitzel TM. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1996,  118:  1931 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • For selected articles on olefin cross metathesis, see:
  • 10a Cossy J. BouzBouz S. Hoveyda AH. J. Organomet. Chem.  2001,  624:  327 
    Google Scholar
  • 10b Chatterjee AK. Choi T.-L. Sanders DP. Grubbs RH. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2003,  125:  11360 
    Google Scholar
  • For a recent review, see:
  • 10c Connon SJ. Blechert S. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2003,  42:  1900 
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Iwaki S. Marumo S. Saito T. Yamada M. Katagiri K. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1974,  96:  7842 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 For an example of the use of Grubbs’ catalyst as a reagent for N-deallylation, see: Alcaide B. Almendros P. Alonso JM. Aly MF. Org. Lett.  2001,  3:  3781 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kolb HC. Sharpless KB. Tetrahedron  1992,  48:  10515 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Perrin DD. Armarego WLF. Purification of Laboratory Chemicals, 3rd ed.   Pergamon Press; Oxford: 1988. 
    Google Scholar
11

The ratio of E/Z-regioisomers in 10 (1:5), which was estimated by ¹³C NMR spectroscopy, was not important because the double bond was reduced by hydrogenation in the next step.

13

We have found that Grubbs’ catalyst cleanly cleaved the N-O bond of 4 to furnish diol in the case of the absence of a cross-metathesis partner; detailed results will be published in due course.