Zusammenfassung
Die Insulinpumpentherapie (Continuierliche Subcutane Insulin Infusion – CSII) ist eine etablierte Therapieform für die Insulin-Behandlung von Patienten mit Typ-1-Diabetes. Eine subtile Einstellung vorausgesetzt, profitieren die Patienten nach Umstellung von der ICT / MDI[1 ] auf die CSII von der Verbesserung des HbA1c-Wertes und / oder der Abnahme der Hypoglykämierate. Im Weiteren ist von der verbesserten Stoffwechsellage eine verminderte Progredienz diabetischer Folgeerkrankungen zu erwarten. Die CSII wird begleitet von einer großen Anzahl experimenteller Untersuchungen. Metaanalysen von randomisierten, kontrollierten klinischen Studien belegen die therapeutische Evidenz der Insulinpumpenbehandlung.
Abstract
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) is an established way of insulin therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes. After correct insulin adjustment the patients on CSII experienced an improvement of HbA1c – and / or the decreasing rate of hypoglycemic reactions. On the long term an improved metabolic situation will lead to a reduction of long-term diabetic complications. The CSII has been studied in many experimental investigations. Meta-analyses of clinical trials have proved the therapeutic evidence of CSII.
Schlüsselwörter
Typ-1-Diabetes - Insulinpumpentherapie (CSII) - Meta-Analysen - Evidenz der CSII - Hypoglykämierrate - HbA1c
Key words
type 1 diabetes - continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) - meta-analyses - clinical evidence - rate of hypoglycemic reactions - HbA1c
Literatur
1 Henrichs H R. Diabetestherapie mit Insulinpumpen. ISBN 3-89599-650-5; UNI-MED Verlag: 2003
2 Henrichs H R. Who should access Insulin pump treatment?. IDF-TWAS-Meeting Warzaw 2006. www.idf.org/webdata/docs/Presentation%20Henrichs%20Who%20should%20access%20pump%20therapy.ppt
3
Bode B.
Pump therapy.
Diabetic Medicine.
2006;
23 (Suppl. 4)
426-427
4
Koivisto V A, Yki-Jarvinen H, Helve E et al.
Pathogenesis and prevention of the dawn phenomenon in diabetic patients treated with CSII.
Diabetes.
1986;
35
78-82
5
Bode B W, Steed R D, Davidson P C.
Reduction in severe hypoglycemia with long-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care.
1996;
19
324-327
6
Aragona M, Giannarelli R, Coppelli A et al.
Improvement of retinopathy in Type 1 diabetic patients treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).
Diabetes Metabol.
2003;
29
235
7
Lüddeke H J, Hofmann W, Guder W G et al.
Urinary albumin concentration in 52 CSII treated type 1 diabetic patients during a follow-up of 4 years.
Diabetes und Stoffwechsel.
2002;
11 (Suppl. 1)
115
8
Linkeschova R, Raoul M, Bott U et al.
Less severe hypoglycaemia, better metabolic control, and improved quality of life in Type 1 diabetes mellitus with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) therapy; an observational study of 100 consecutive patients followed for a mean of 2 years.
Diabetic Medicine.
2002;
19
746-751
9
Doyle E A, Weinzimer S A, Steffen A T et al.
A randomized, prospective trial comparing the efficacy of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion with multiple daily injection using insulin Glargine.
Diabetes Care.
2004;
27
1554-1558
10
Vortherms J, Klinkert C, Lotz N et al.
Insulinpumpentherapie bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mit schwerwiegenden Verhaltensauffälligkeiten.
Diabetes und Stoffwechsel.
2001;
10 (Suppl. 1)
56
11
Knight S, Northam E, Donath S et al.
Improvements in cognition, mood and behaviour following commencement of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion therapy in children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: a pilot study.
Diabetologia.
2009;
52
193-198
12
Danne T, Lange K, Kordonouri O.
New developments in the treatment of type 1 diabetes in children.
Arch Dis Child.
2007;
92
1015-1019
13
Holder M, Ludwig-Seibold C, Lilienthal E für die DPV-Wiss-Initiative et al.
Trends in der Insulinpumpentherapie bei Kindern, Jugendlichen und jungen Erwachsenen mit Typ-1-Diabetes von 1995–2006: Daten der DPV-Initiative.
Diabetologie & Stoffwechsel.
2007;
2
169-174
14
Pickup J, Sutten A J.
Severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of multiple daily insulin injections compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
Diabetic Medicine.
2008;
25
765-774
15
Jeitler K, Horvath K, Berghold A et al.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in patients with diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Diabetologia.
2008;
51
941-951
16 NICE CSII Guidance TA151 .Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. Review of technology appraisal guidance 57, Issue Date July 2008: http://www.nice.org.uk/ta151
17
Hoogma R PL, Hammond P J, Gomis R on behalf of the 5-Nations Study Group et al.,.
Comparison of the effects continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and NPH-based multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) on glycaemic control and quality of life: results of the 5-nations trial.
Diabetes Medicine.
2005;
23
141-147
18
Weissberg-Benchell J, Antisdel-Lomaglio J, Seshadri R.
Insulin pump therapy: a meta-analysis.
Diabetes Care.
2003;
26
1079-1087
19
Pickup J, Keen H.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion at 25 years: Evidence base for the expanding use of insulin pump therapy in type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care.
2002;
25
593-598
20
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group .
The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.
The New England Journal of Medicine.
1993;
14
977-986
21
Unger H, Henrichs H R.
DCCT 1992 (Diabetes Control and Complications Trial) – Zum Stand der US-amerikanischen Großstudie über den Zusammenhang zwischen Einstellungsqualität und Diabeteskomplikationen.
Diabetes und Stoffwechsel.
1992;
1
286-289
22
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group .
The relationship of glycemic exposure (HbA1c) to the risk of development and progression of retinopathy in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.
Diabetes.
1995;
44
968-983
23
Eeg-Olofsson K, Cederholm J, Nilsson P M for the Steering Committee of the Swedish National Diabetes Register Glycemic and Risk Factor Control in Type 1 Diabetes et al.,.
Results from 13 612 patients in a national diabetes register.
Diabetes Care.
2007;
30
496-502
24
Behre A, Ehren M, Reinsch B et al.
Erste Erfahrungen mit kontinuierlichem Glukose-Monitoring unter Klinikbedingungen.
Diabetes und Stoffwechsel.
2001;
10 (Suppl. 1)
126
25
Pickup J, Mattock M, Kerry S.
Glycaemic control with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion compared with intensive insulin injections in patients with type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
BMJ.
2002;
324
1-6
26
Kilpatrick E S, Rigby A S, Atkin S L.
The effect of glucose variability on the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care.
2006;
29
1486-1490
27
Monnier L, Mas E, Ginet C et al.
Activation of oxidative stress by acute glucose fluctuations compared with sustained chronic hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes.
JAMA.
2006;
295
1681-1687
28
Monnier L, Colette C, Leiter L et al.
The effect of glucose variability on the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care.
2007;
30
185-186
29
The Diabetes Research in Children Network (DirecNet) Study Group .
The effect of glucose variability on the risk of microvascular complications in type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care.
2007;
30
185
30
Hirsch I B, Brownlee M.
Should minimal blood glucose variability become the gold standard of glycemic control?.
Journal of Diabetes and Its Complications.
2005;
19
178-181
31
Ceriello A, Kumar S, Piconi L et al.
Simultaneous control of hyperglycemia and oxidative stress normalizes endothelial function in type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care.
2007;
30
649-654
32
Wentholt I ME, Kulik W, Michels R PJ et al.
Glucose fluctuations and activation of oxidative stress in patients with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetologia.
2008;
51
183-190
33
The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group .
Hypoglycemia in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.
Diabetes.
1997;
46
271-286
34
Retnakaran R, DeVries H J, Hanaire-Broutin H et al.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections.
Diabetes Care.
2005;
28
1835-1836
35
Dahl-Jorgensen K, Brinchmann-Hansen O, Hanssen K F et al.
Rapid tightening of blood glucose control leads to transient deterioration of retinopathy in insulin dependent diabetes mellitus: the Oslo study.
BMJ.
1985;
290
811-815
36
Dahl-Jorgensen K, Brinchmann-Hansen O, Hanssen K F.
Effect of near normoglycaemia for two years on progression of early diabetic retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy: the Oslo study.
BMJ.
1986;
293
1195-1199
37
Austenat E, Würzner M, Semmler S et al.
CSII Is Superior to MDI for type 1 diabetes under real world conditions in clinical endpoints.
Diabetes.
2006;
55 (Suppl. 1)
A 459
38
Lauritzen T, Pramming S, Deckert T et al.
Pharmacokinetics of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
Diabetologia.
1983;
24
326-329
39
Heise T, Nosek L, Biilmann Ronn B et al.
Lower within-subject variability of insulin detemir in comparison to NPH insulin and insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes.
2004;
53
1614-1620
40
Chase H P, Saib S Z, MacKenzie T et al.
Post-prandial glucose excursions following four methods of bolus insulin administration in subjects with Type 1 diabetes.
Diabetic Medicine.
2002;
19
317-321
41
Lee M S, Cao M, Sajid A et al.
The dual-wave bolus feature in CSII controls prolonged post-prandial hyperglycemia better than standard bolus in type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes.
2003;
52 (Suppl. 1)
A 138
42
Jones S M, Quarry J L, Caldwell-McMillan M et al.
Optimal insulin pump dosing and postprandial glycemia following a pizza meal using the continuous glucose monitoring system.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics.
2005;
7
233-240
43
O’Connell M A, Gilbertson H R, Donath S M et al.
Optimizing postprandial glycemia in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes using insulin pump therapy.
Diabetes Care.
2008;
31
1491-1495
44
Pankowska E, Szypowska A, Lipka M et al.
Three kind of mealtime insulin administration and metabolic control in diabetic children on insulin pumps.
Diabetologia.
2008;
51 (Suppl. 1)
381
45
Morrison G, Purewal T S, Weston P J.
Intensive management with CSII can prevent hospital admissions of patients with gastroparesis.
Diabetologia.
2006;
49 (Suppl. 1)
677-678
46
Gross T M, Kayne D, King A et al.
A bolus calculator is an effective means of controlling postprandial glycemia in patients on insulin pump therapy.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics.
2003;
5
365-369
47
Shashaj B, Busetto E, Sulli N.
Benefits of a bolus calculator in pre- and postprandial glycaemic control and meal flexibility of paediatric patients using continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).
Diabetic Medicine.
2008;
25
1036-1042
48 Jankovec Z. Frequency of available insulin pump functions use by patients with diabetes mellitus. 1st ATTD Meeting, Prague 2008: Proceedings 112
49
Liebl A, Krinelke L.
Long-term results of insulin pump therapy (CSII) in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus in Germany.
Diabetologia Polska.
2003;
10
179-185
50
Zinman B, Chiasson J L, Tildesley H et al.
Insulin lispro in CSII: results of a double-blind crossover study.
Diabetes.
1997;
46
440-443
51
Bode B W, Steed R D, Davidson P C.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII): a study comparing lispro to regular human insulin.
Diabetes.
1997;
46 (Suppl.)
A 167
52
Renard E, Vague V, Pinget M et al.
SC Infusion of insulin Lispro vs regular insulin by portable pumps: significant improvement of HbA1c and blood glucose stability under insulin Lispro.
Diabetes.
1997;
46 (Suppl. 1)
419
53
Reichel A, Rietzsch H, Köhler H J et al.
Cessation of insulin infusion at night-time during CSII-therapy: comparison of regular human insulin and insulin lispro.
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes..
1998;
106
168-172
54
Guerci B, Meyer L, Salle A S et al.
Comparison of metabolic deterioration between insulin analog and regular insulin after a 5-hour interruption of a continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in type 1 diabetic patients.
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism.
1999;
84
2673-2678
55
Schartmann U, Larbig M, Schone E et al.
3-Hydroxybutyrate monitoring by means of a hand-held device after interruption of insulin pump therapy.
Diabetologia.
2000;
43 (Suppl. 1)
A 208
56
Attila N, Holcombe J, Jones T W et al.
Comparison of human regular and Lispro insulins after interruption of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and in the treatment of acutely decompensated IDDM.
Diabetes Care.
1998;
21
817-821
57
Renner R, Pfutzner A, Trautmann M et al.
Use of insulin lispro in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion treatment. Results of a multicenter trial. German Humalog – CSII Study Group.
Diabetes Care.
1999;
22
784-788
58
Colquitt J, Royle P, Waugh N.
Are analogue insulins better than soluble in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion? Results of a meta-analysis.
Diabetic Medicine.
2003;
20
863-866
59
Schmauss S, König A, Landgraf R.
Human insulin analogue [LYS(B28), PRO(B29)]: the ideal pump insulin?.
Diabet Med.
1998;
15
247-249
60
Linkeschova R, Spraul M, Jatzkowski E et al.
Quality of life, treatment satisfaction and diabetes control on insulin Lispro and regular human insulin during CSII: a randomised double-blind crossover study.
Diabetes Metabol.
2003;
29
226
61
Schäfermeyer M T, Jatzkowksi E, Linkeschova R et al.
Insulinpumpentherapie mit Insulin Lispro versus Normalinsulin bei Diabetes mellitus Typ 1 – Doppelblinde Cross-over-Studie unter Einbeziehung des ContinuousGlucose Monitoring System (CGMS).
Diabetologie.
2006;
1
137
62
Bode B W, Weinstein R, Bell D et al.
Comparison of insulin Aspart with buffered regular insulin and insulin Lispro in continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
Diabetes Care.
2002;
25
439-444
63
Hanaire-Broutin H, Schumiki D-M, Hoogma R PLM et al.
Safety of insulin Glulisine compared with insulin Aspart administered by continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII).
Diabetes.
2004;
53 (Suppl. 2)
A4
64
Lepore G, Dodesini A R, Nosari I et al.
Both continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and a multiple daily insulin injection regimen with Glargine as basal insulin are equally better than traditional multiple daily insulin injection treatment.
Diabetes Care.
2003;
26
1321-1324
65
Lepore G, Dodesini A R, Nosari I et al.
Effect of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs multiple daily insulin injection treatment.
Diabetes Metab.
2004;
17
84-89
66
Bolli G, Capani F, Home P D et al.
Comparison of a multiple daily injection regimen with once-daily insulin Glargine basal insulin and mealtime Lispro, to continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: a randomised, open, parallel study.
Diabetes.
2004;
53 (Suppl. 2)
A107
67
Pickup J C, Kidd J, Burmiston D et al.
Effectiveness of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in hypoglycaemia-prone type 1 diabetes.
Practical Diabetes International.
2005;
22
10-14
68
The EQuality1 Study Group .
Quality of life and treatment satisfaction in adults with Type 1 diabetes: a comparison between continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injections.
Diabetic Medicine.
2008;
25
213-220
69
Schottenfeld-Naor Y, Galatzer A, Karp M et al.
Comparison of metabolic and psychological parameters during continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and intensified conventional insulin treatment in type I diabetic patients.
Isr J Med Sci.
1985;
21
822-828
70
Shapiro J, Wigg D, Charles M A et al.
Personality and family profiles of chronic insulin-dependent diabetic patients using portable insulin infusion pump therapy: a preliminary investigation.
Diabetes Care.
1984;
7
137-142
71
Boland E A, Grey M, Oesterle A et al.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. A new way to lower risk of severe hypoglycemia, improve metabolic control, and enhance coping in adolescents with type 1 diabetes.
Diabetes Care.
22;
1999
1779-1784
72
Herman W H, Ilag L L, Johnson S L et al.
Clinical trial of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections in older adults with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Care.
2005;
28
1568-1573
73
Edelman S V, Bode B W, Bailey T S et al.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion in patients with type 2 diabetes safely improved glycemic control using a simple insulin dosing regimen.
Diabetes.
2009;
58 (Suppl. 1)
A113
74
Li Y, Xu W, Liao Z, Chen X et al.
Induction of long-term glycemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients is associated with improvement of β-cell function.
Diabetes Care.
2004;
27
2597-2602
75
Choi S B, Lee S M, Kim D Y et al.
Changes in adipokine profiles in type 2 diabetics treated with long-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion.
Diabetes.
2006;
55 (Suppl. 1)
A 97
76
Jankovec Z, Cechurova D, Krcma M et al.
The influence of insulin pump treatment on metabolic syndrome parameters in type 2 diabetic patients.
Diabetes.
2006;
55 (Suppl. 1)
A 142-A 143
77
Hanefeld M, Fischer S, Julius U et al.
Risk factors for myocardial infarction and death in newly detected NIDDM: the Diabetes Interventional Study, 11-year follow-up.
Diabetologia.
1996;
39
1577-1583
78
Chen H-S, Hsiao L-C, Wu T-E et al.
Beneficial effects of insulin on glycemic control and β-cell function in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes with severe hyperglycemia after short-term intensive insulin therapy.
Diabetes Care.
2008;
31
1927-1932
79
Ilkova H, Glaser B, Tunckale A et al.
Induction of long-term glycemic control in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients by transient intensive insulin treatment.
Diabetes Care.
1997;
20
1353-1356
80
Noh Y-H, Lee J-H, Lee J-H et al.
Long-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion treatment improved insulinogenic index and proinsulin-to-insulin ratio in longstanding type 2 diabetic patients.
Diabetes.
2009;
58 (Suppl. 1)
A61
81
Zhang B, Chen Y, Yang Z et al.
The role of acute glucagon response in long-term remission of newly-diagnosed type 2 diabetes induced by short-term insulin intensive treatment.
Diabetes.
2009;
58 (Suppl. 1)
A62
82
Raskin P, Bode B W, Marks J B et al.
Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion and multiple daily injection therapy are equally effective in type 2 diabetes. A randomized, parallel-group, 24-week study.
Diabetes Care.
2003;
26
2598-2603
83
The ACCORD Study Group .
Effects of intensive glucose lowering in type 2 diabetes.
N Engl J Med.
2008;
358
2545-2559
84
Gill G V, Woodward A, Casson I F et al.
Cardiac arrhythmia and nocturnal hypoglycaemia in type 1 diabetes – the ‘dead in bed’ syndrome revisited.
Diabetologia.
2009;
52
42-45
85 Sozialmedizinische Expertengruppe .„Versorgungsstrukturen“ (SEG-3) der MDK-Gemeinschaft Sozialmedizinische Stellungnahme zur Behandlung des Diabetes mellitus mit externen Insulinpumpen. April 2006
86
Halvorson M, Carpenter S, Kaiserman K et al.
A Pilot trial in pediatrics with the sensor-augmented pump: combining real-time continuous glucose monitoring with the insulin pump.
J Pediatr.
2007;
150
103-105
87
Petrovski G, Dimitrovski C, Milenkovic T.
Insulin pump therapy with continuous glucose monitoring improves metabolic control in brittle type 1 diabetes.
Prilozi Odd Biol Med Nauki.
2008;
28
129-135
88
Hirsch I B, Abelseth J, Bode B W et al.
Sensor-augmented insulin pump therapy: results of the first randomized treat-to-target study.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics.
2008;
10
377-383
89
The Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation Continuous Glucose Monitoring Study Group .
Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes.
NEJM.
2008;
359
1464-1476
90
Buckingham B A, Cobry E, Clinton P et al.
Preventing hypoglycemia using predictive alarm algorithms and insulin pump suspension.
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics.
2009;
11
93-97
1 MDI (multiple daily insulin injections), in der englischsprachigen Literatur synonym verwendet für ICT (sogenannte intensivierte conventionelle Insulintherapie)
Prof. Dr. med. H. R. Henrichs
Wilhelmstr. 7
49610 Quakenbrück
Email: hrhenrichs@t-online.de