Frühzeitiges entwicklungsneurologisches Screening frühgeborener Kinder von Geburt an

Zusammenfassung

Frühgeborene Kinder haben ein hohes Risiko für Entwicklungsstörungen. Daher sind Früherkennungsprogramme erforderlich, die anhand verschiedener diagnostischer Verfahren auch geringe kognitive Defizite und Verhaltensauffälligkeiten frühzeitig aufzeigen. Das Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) beinhaltet standardisierte klinische Untersuchungsprotokolle, die bereits unmittelbar postpartum zur entwicklungsneurologischen Beurteilung auch sehr instabiler frühgeborener Kinder angewendet werden können.

Abstract

Preterm infants are at high risk to develop neurological disorders. Therefore extensive follow-up programs with a combination of various instruments are needed for early detection of infants with major or minor developmental disorders and behavioral problems. The Newborn Individualized Developmental Care and Assessment Program (NIDCAP) is based on standardized observation protocols and provides a powerful method to assess behavior and brain development directly after birth, so can be used as an early screening instrument.

Frühgeborene - entwicklungsneurologische Untersuchung - NIDCAP - Nachsorgeprogramm

preterm infants - neurodevelopmental examination - NIDCAP - screening instrument

Literatur

• 1 Als H, Lawhon G, Brown E. et al . Individualized behavioral and environmental care for the very low birth weight preterm infant at high risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia: Neonatal intensive care unit and developmental outcome.  Pediatrics. 1986;  78 1123-1132
• 2 Als H, Duffy FH, McAnulty GB. et al . Early Experience Alters Brain Funktion and Strukture.  Pediatrics. 2004;  113 ((4)) 846-857
• 3 American Academy of Pediatrics, Division of Health Policy Research . Periodic survey of fellows #53: identification of children <36 months at risk for developmental problems and referral to early identification programs. Available at:  http://www.aap.org/research/periodicsurvey/ps53exs.htm
• 4 Amiel-Tison C, Gosselin J. Neurological Development from Birth to six Years: Guide for Examination and Evaluation. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press 2001
• 5 Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development. 2nd ed. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation 1993
• 6 Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. 3rd ed. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment 2006
• 7 Bhutta AT, Cleves MA, Casey PH. et al . Cognitive and behavioral outcomes of school-aged children who were born preterm: a meta-analysis.  JAMA. 2002;  288 728-737
• 8 Blauw-Hospers CH, Hadders-Algra M. A systematic review of the effects of early intervention on motor development.  Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;  47 421-432
• 9 Campell SK, Kolobe TH, Osten ET. et al . Construct validity of the test of infant motor performance.  Phys Ther. 1995;  75 585-596
• 10 Capute AJ, Accardo PJ, Vining EP. et al . Primitive reflex profile. A pilot study.  Phys Ther. 1978;  58 1061-1065
• 11 Chandler LS, Andrews MS, Swanson MW. Movement Assessment of Infants: A Manual. Rolling Bay, WA: Chandler, Andrews and Swanson 1980
• 12 De Graaf-Peters VB, Hadders-Algra M. Ontogeny of the human central nervous system: what is happening when?.  Early Hum Dev. 2006;  82 257-266
• 13 De Groot L, Hopkins B, Touwen BC. A method to assess the development of muscle power in preterms after term age.  Neuropediatrics. 1992;  23 172-179
• 14 De Vries LS, van Haastert IC, Rademaker KJ. et al . Ultrasound abnormalities preceding cerebral palsy in high-risk preterm infants.  J Pediatr. 2004;  144 815-820
• 15 Einspieler C, Prechtl HFR, Bos AF. et al .Prechtl's Method on the Qualitative Assessment of General Movements in Preterm, Term and Young Infants. Clinics in Developmental Medicine, No. 167. London, England: Mac Keith Press 2004
• 16 Ellison PH, Horn JL, Browning CA. Construction of an Infant Neurological International Battery (Infanib) for the assessment of neurological integrity in infancy.  Phys Ther. 1985;  65 1326-1331
• 17 Folio MR, Fewell RR. Peabody Developmental Motor Scales: Examiner's Manual. 2nd ed. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed 2000
• 18 Gorga D, Stern F. The Neuromotor Behavioural Inventory. New York: New York Hospital-Cornell Medical Center 1979
• 19 Haataja L, Mercuri E, Regev R. et al . Optimality score for the neurologic examination of the infant at 12 and 18 months of age.  J Pediatr. 1999;  135 153-161
• 20 Hadders-Algra M. General movements: a window for early identification of children at high risk for developmental disorders.  J Pediatr. 2004;  145 S12-S18
• 21 Heineman KR, Hadders-Algra M. Evaluation of neuromotor function in infancy- a systematic review of available methods.  J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008;  29 315-323
• 22 Leijser LM, de Vries LS, Cowan FM. Using cerebral ultrasound effectively in the newborn infant.  Early Hum Dev. 2006;  82 827-835
• 23 Miller LJ, Roid GH. The TIME Toddler and Infant Motor Evaluation: A Standardized Assessment. San Antonio, TX: Therapy Skill Builders 1994
• 24 Persson K, Strömberg B. Structured Observation of Motor Performance (SOMP-I) applied to neonatally healthy fullterm infants at the ages of 0-10 months.  Early Hum Dev. 1995;  40 127-143
• 25 Piper MC, Darrah J. Motor Assessment of the Developing Infant. Philadelphia: Saunders 1994
• 26 Sices L, Feudtner C, McLaughlin J. et al . How do primary care physicians identify young children with developmental delays? A national survey.  J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2003;  24 409-417
• 27 Sommer C, Urlesberger B, Maurer-Fellbaum U. et al . Neurodevelopmental Outcome at 2 Years in 23 to 26 Weeks Old Gestation Infants.  Klin Pädiatr. 2007;  219 23-29
• 28 Touwen BCL. Neurological Development in Infancy. Clin Dev Med, No.58. Heinemann Med Books. London 1976
• 29 Vollmer B, Roth S, Baudin J. et al . Predictors of long-term outcome in very preterm infants: gestational age versus neonatal cranial ultrasound.  Pediatrics. 2003;  112 1108-1114
• 30 Woodward LJ, Anderson PJ, Austin NC. et al . Neonatal MRI to predict neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants.  N Engl J Med. 2006;  355 685-694

Korrespondenzadresse