Limitations Of High Urgency Listing – Ventricular Assist Device Support in a Neonate for 452 Days

Abstract

The Eurotransplant International Foundation in Leiden, the Netherlands, is responsible for mediation and allocation of organ donation procedures to its member countries Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Germany, Luxemburg, the Netherlands and Slovenia. To provide organs for the patients who require urgent transplantation, the “high urgent (HU)” status was introduced in 2001 in Germany [1]. This new HU allocation system is applicable to neonates as well as adults. However, waiting times on HU status exceed several weeks to months. Therefore an increasing number of pediatric patients has to undergo implantation of a ventricular assist device (VAD) [2]. In the present report we discuss the current Eurotransplant heart allocation system for pediatric heart transplantation in the light of a neonate with 452 days on mechanical support. We compare the average waiting time of patients on HU status at our center and their outcome in 2007 and 2008 (Data obtained from Eurotransplant International Foundation). Waiting time on HU status in our center increased significantly from 2007 to 2008. Therefore more patients require VAD support as bridging to transplantation. The case of a neonate under long-term VAD support is an outstanding example of the negative effects of this development.

Key words

ventricular assist device - newborn - pediatric - Eurotransplant International Foundation - high urgent status - heart transplantation - organ allocation

References

• 1 Koch A, Tochtermann U, Remppis A et al. The eurotransplant high-urgency heart transplantation program: an option for patients in acute heart failure?.  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006;  54 414-417
• 2 Komoda T, Lehmkuhl H B, Stiller B, Berger F, Hetzer R. Pediatric heart transplant candidates with failed donor heart allocation after eurotransplant urgency listing profit from pretransplant mechanical circulatory support bridging.  Artif Organs. 2009;  33 346-351
• 3 Bland E F, White P D, Garland J. Congenital anomalies of the coronary arteries: report of an unusual case associated with cardiac hypertrophy.  Am Heart J. 1933;  8 787-801
• 4 Tjan T D, Hoffmeier A, Scheld H H, Klotz S. Ventricular assist device implantation in newborns – adjustment of the Berlin Heart EXCOR arterial cannula using bovine pericardium.  J Thoracic Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;  DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.04.016 , (in press) E-pub ahead of print July 3, 2009
  
• 5 Camboni D, Schmid C, Rellensmann G, Tjan T D. Enoxiparin for long-term anticoagulation with the pediatric EXCOR left ventricular assist device.  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2005;  4 561-562
• 6 Badiwala M V, Rao V. Left ventricular device as destination therapy: are we there yet?.  Curr Opin Cardiol. 2009;  24 184-189
• 7 Cassidy J, Haynes S, Kirk R et al. Changing patterns of bridging to heart transplantation in children.  J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;  28 249-254
• 8 Jones C B, Cassidy J V, Kirk R et al. Successful bridge to recovery with 120 days of mechanical support in an infant with myocarditis.  J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009;  28 202-205
• 9 Schmid C, Debus V, Gogarten W et al. Pediatric assist with the medos and excor systems in small children.  ASAIO J. 2006;  52 505-508
• 10 Schweigmann U, Antretter H, Mair P et al. The pediatric mechanical circulatory support program in Innsbruck, Austria, and the impact of such programs on lack of donor hearts in europe.  ASAIO J. 2007;  53 696-700
• 11 Minami K, Knyphausen E, Suzuki R et al. Mechanical ventricular circulatory support in children; Bad Oeynhausen experience.  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2005;  11 307-312
• 12 Asfour B, Weyand M, Kececioglu D et al. A novel paracorporeal mechanical assist device for newborns and infants allows bridging to transplantation.  Transplant Proc. 1997;  29 3330-3332
• 13 Weyand M, Kececioglu D, Schmid C et al. Successful bridging to cardiac transplantation in a dystrophic infant with the use of a new paracorporeal pneumatic pump.  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;  114 505-507
• 14 Deng M C, Weyand M, Hammel D et al. Selection and management of ventricular assist device patients: the Muenster experience.  J Heart Lung Transplant. 2000;  19 S77-S82
• 15 Komoda T, Drews T, Lehmkuhl H B, Hetzer R. Role of ventricular assist devices in the German heart allocation system.  J Artif Organs. 2006;  9 29-33
• 16 Komoda T, Hetzer R, Lehmkuhl H B. Destiny of candidates for heart transplantation in the Eurotransplant heart allocation system.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;  34 301-306
• 17 Kamiya H, Koch A, Sack F U et al. Who needs ‘bridge to transplantation in the presence of the Eurotransplant high-urgency heart transplantation program?.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2008;  34 1129-1133
• 18 Stiller B, Weng Y, Hubler M et al. Pneumatic pulsatile ventricular assist devices in children under 1 year of age.  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005;  28 234-239