Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2010; 70(3): 219-225
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1240918
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Intraoperative Radiotherapie (IORT) des Mammakarzinoms mit Elektronen – eigene Erfahrungen, aktuelle Aspekte und Literaturübersicht

Intraoperative Radiotherapy (IORT) with Electrons for Breast Cancer – Our Experience, Current Considerations and Review of the LiteratureM. D. Piroth1 , U. Heindrichs2 , M. Pinkawa1 , D. M. Piroth2 , A. Schmachtenberg1 , A. Perez-Bouza3 , N. Maass2 , M. J. Eble1
  • 1Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen
  • 2Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtsmedizin (Schwerpunkt Senologie), Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen
  • 3Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 20.10.2009 revidiert 10.12.2009

akzeptiert 14.1.2010

Publication Date:
17 March 2010 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Fragestellung: Ist eine Boost-Bestrahlung im Rahmen der Radiotherapie des Mammakarzinoms indiziert, stellt die intraoperative Radiotherapie (IORT) eine Alternative zur perkutanen Boost-Bestrahlung dar. Material und Methodik: Insgesamt 54 Patientinnen mit Mammakarzinom wurden von 1/2006–2/2009 im Rahmen einer BET einer Boost-IORT zugeführt. Die IORT wurde mittels dediziertem mobilem Linearbeschleuniger (NOVAC7®) durchgeführt. Das Follow-up beträgt bisher 25 (6–56) Monate. Die Boost-IORT-Indikation wurde bei einem Alter ≤ 50 Jahre und/oder einer bildgebenden Tumorgröße von ≥ 2 cm gestellt. Nach Tumorresektion erfolgte eine Mobilisierung und Approximation des Gewebes. Anschließend erfolgte unter direkter visueller Kontrolle die Tubusplatzierung im Situs. Die Boost-Dosis betrug 10 Gray. Im Anschluss an die Boost-IORT folgte postoperativ die perkutane Ganzbrustbestrahlung. Ergebnisse: Bisher trat 1 lokales Rezidiv auf. Das lokalrezidivfreie bzw. Gesamtüberleben liegt bei 98,2 bzw. 96,3 %. Es trat keine Grad-III/IV-Toxizität auf. Leichtgradige Erytheme, Hyperpigmentierungen, Teleangiektasien oder Fibrosierungen zeigten sich bei 70,4, 7,4, 5,6 oder 25,9 % der Patientinnen. Das kosmetische Ergebnis wurde von 90,7 % der Patientinnen und 94,4 % der Ärzte als sehr gut oder gut beurteilt. Eine Boost-IORT würden, wenn nötig, 96,9 % der Patientinnen wieder durchführen lassen. Schlussfolgerung: Die Boost-IORT ist mit einer geringen Teleangiektasie-, Hyperpigmentierungs- sowie sukutanen Fibroserate assoziiert. Die Gefahr eines „geographical miss“, bedingt durch postoperative Wundbettveränderungen, onkoplastische Gewebsverlagerungen oder Migration gesetzter Markierungsclips, ist bei der Boost-IORT ausgeschlossen. Die Ergebnisse unserer Analyse zeigen vergleichbar mit den Daten der Literatur eine hohe lokale Effizienz, geringe Nebenwirkungsrate und hohe Patientenakzeptanz der Boost-IORT.

Abstract

Purpose: If boost irradiation is indicated as a radiotherapy for breast cancer, intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) can be an alternative to a percutaneous boost. Materials and Methods: A total of 54 patients with breast cancer were treated with IORT boost as part of a breast conserving therapy from 1/2006–2/2009, using the dedicated mobile linear accelerator NOVAC7®. Mean follow-up time was 25 (range: 6–56) months. The indications for IORT boost were age ≤ 50 years and/or tumor size ≥ 2 cm in preoperative imaging. After tumor resection the tissue was mobilized and approximated. The irradiation tube was placed into the situs under direct visual control. The boost dose was 10 Gy. Percutaneous whole breast irradiation was performed subsequently to the IORT boost. Results: One local relapse was seen to date. Freedom from local relapse and overall survival rates are 98.2 and 96.3 %, respectively. No patient suffered grade III/IV toxicity. Mild erythema, hyperpigmentation, telangiectasia or fibrosis occurred in 70.4, 7.4, 5.6 and 25.9 % of patients. The cosmetic result was assessed as very good or good by 90.7 % of patients and 94.4 % of physicians. Overall, 96.9 % of the patients would undergo boost IORT again, if necessary. Conclusion: Boost IORT is associated with a low rate of telangiectasia, hyperpigmentation and subcutaneous fibrosis. The risk of a “geographical miss” due to postoperative tissue changes, oncoplastic shifts or migration of clip markers is excluded. The results of our analysis are comparable to those reported in the literature and show a high local efficiency, low toxicity and high patient acceptance of IORT boost.

Literatur

  • 1 du Bois A, Misselwitz B, Wagner U et al. „Disease-Management-Programm (DMP) Brustkrebs“ und Versorgungsstruktur bei der operativen Therapie des Mammakarzinoms in Hessen 2002.  Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2004;  64 261-270
  • 2 Kreienberg R, Kopp I, Albert U et al. Interdisziplinäre S3-Leitlinie für die Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Mammakarzinoms (1. Aktualisierung 2008). Informationszentrum für Standards in der Onkologie (ISTO) 2008
  • 3 Fitzal F, Gnant M. Breast conservation: evolution of surgical strategies.  Breast J. 2006;  12 S165-S173
  • 4 Strobl B, Janni W, Rjosk D et al. Efficacy and adverse effects of breast conserving therapy in stage I and II breast cancer – a long-term study.  Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2002;  62 155-162
  • 5 Gauwerky J F, Costa S, Kaufmann M. Technik der Tumorektomie bei zentraler Mammakarzinomlokalisation.  Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 1996;  56 600-604
  • 6 Halsted W. The results of operations for the cure of cancer of the breast performed at the Johns Hopkins Hospital from June, 1889, to January, 1894.  Arch Surg. 1894;  20 497-555
  • 7 Veronesi U, Zurrida S. Breast cancer surgery: a century after Halsted.  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 1996;  122 74-77
  • 8 Patey D H. A review of 146 cases of carcinoma of the breast operated on between 1930 and 1943.  Br J Cancer. 1967;  21 260-269
  • 9 Fisher B, Redmond C, Poisson R et al. Eight-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.  N Engl J Med. 1989;  320 822-828
  • 10 Fisher B, Bauer M, Margolese R et al. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy and segmental mastectomy with or without radiation in the treatment of breast cancer.  N Engl J Med. 1985;  312 665-673
  • 11 Fisher B, Anderson S, Redmond C K et al. Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.  N Engl J Med. 1995;  333 1456-1461
  • 12 Veronesi U, Saccozzi R, Del V M et al. Comparing radical mastectomy with quadrantectomy, axillary dissection, and radiotherapy in patients with small cancers of the breast.  N Engl J Med. 1981;  305 6-11
  • 13 Veronesi U, Luini A, Del V M et al. Radiotherapy after breast-preserving surgery in women with localized cancer of the breast.  N Engl J Med. 1993;  328 1587-1591
  • 14 Veronesi U, Cascinelli N, Mariani L et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized study comparing breast-conserving surgery with radical mastectomy for early breast cancer.  N Engl J Med. 2002;  347 1227-1232
  • 15 Sauer R, Schauer A, Rauschecker H F The German Breast Cancer Study Group et al. Breast preservation versus mastectomy in early breast cancer – 1991 update of the GBSG 1-protocol and prognostic factors.  Strahlenther Onkol. 1992;  168 191-202
  • 16 Rayter Z, Gazet J C, Ford H T et al. Comparison of conservative surgery and radiotherapy with mastectomy in the treatment of early breast cancer.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 1990;  16 486-492
  • 17 Clarke M, Collins R, Darby S et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials.  Lancet. 2005;  366 2087-2106
  • 18 Clark R M, Whelan T, Levine M et al. Randomized clinical trial of breast irradiation following lumpectomy and axillary dissection for node-negative breast cancer: an update. Ontario Clinical Oncology Group.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 1996;  88 1659-1664
  • 19 Whelan T J, Lada B M, Laukkanen E Provincial Breast Disease Site Group et al. Breast irradiation in women with early stage invasive breast cancer following breast conservation surgery.  Cancer Prev Control. 1997;  1 228-240
  • 20 Liljegren G, Holmberg L, Adami H O Uppsala-Orebro Breast Cancer Study Group et al. Sector resection with or without postoperative radiotherapy for stage I breast cancer: five-year results of a randomized trial.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 1994;  86 717-722
  • 21 Buchali A, Budach V. Die Bedeutung der Strahlentherapie in der Behandlung des Mammakarzinoms.  Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2000;  60 594-603
  • 22 Bartelink H, Horiot J C, Poortmans P et al. Recurrence rates after treatment of breast cancer with standard radiotherapy with or without additional radiation.  N Engl J Med. 2001;  345 1378-1387
  • 23 Holland R, Connolly J L, Gelman R et al. The presence of an extensive intraductal component following a limited excision correlates with prominent residual disease in the remainder of the breast.  J Clin Oncol. 1990;  8 113-118
  • 24 Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J et al. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy, and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer.  N Engl J Med. 2002;  347 1233-1241
  • 25 Romestaing P, Lehingue Y, Carrie C et al. Role of a 10-Gy boost in the conservative treatment of early breast cancer: results of a randomized clinical trial in Lyon, France.  J Clin Oncol. 1997;  15 963-968
  • 26 Bedwinek J. Breast conserving surgery and irradiation: the importance of demarcating the excision cavity with surgical clips.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1993;  26 675-679
  • 27 Benda R K, Yasuda G, Sethi A et al. Breast boost: are we missing the target?.  Cancer. 2003;  97 905-909
  • 28 Harrington K J, Harrison M, Bayle P et al. Surgical clips in planning the electron boost in breast cancer: a qualitative and quantitative evaluation.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1996;  34 579-584
  • 29 Machtay M, Lanciano R, Hoffman J et al. Inaccuracies in using the lumpectomy scar for planning electron boosts in primary breast carcinoma.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994;  30 43-48
  • 30 Sauer R. on behalf of the Breast Cancer Expert Group of the German Society of Radiooncology (DEGRO) . Guidelines for radiotherapy in breast cancer.  Strahlenther Onkol. 2006;  182 (Suppl. 1) 1-28
  • 31 Tucker S L, Thames H D, Taylor J M. How well is the probability of tumor cure after fractionated irradiation described by Poisson statistics?.  Radiat Res. 1990;  124 273-282
  • 32 Sautter-Bihl M L, Budach W, Dunst J et al. DEGRO practical guidelines for radiotherapy of breast cancer I.  Strahlenther Onkol. 2007;  183 661-666
  • 33 Trotti A, Colevas A D, Setser A et al. CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment.  Semin Radiat Oncol. 2003;  13 176-181
  • 34 LENT SOMA tables.  Radiother Oncol. 1995;  35 17-60
  • 35 Strobl B, Janni W, Rjosk D et al. Efficacy and adverse effects of breast conserving therapy in stage I and II breast cancer – a long-term study.  Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2002;  62 155-162
  • 36 Beckmann M W, Blohmer J, Costa S D et al. Commentary of a German workgroup for treatment of primary breast cancer.  Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2007;  67 774-778
  • 37 Kantelhardt E J, Tohmssen C. Die aktuellen Empfehlungen der AGO-Kommision Mamma.  Geburtsh Frauenheilk. 2008;  68 96-100
  • 38 Goldhirsch A, Wood W C, Gelber R D et al. Progress and promise: highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007.  Ann Oncol. 2007;  18 1133-1144
  • 39 Kurtz J. The curative role of radiotherapy in the treatment of operable breast cancer.  Eur J Cancer. 2002;  38 1961-1974
  • 40 Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group . Radiotherapy for early breast cancer.  Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2002;  CD003647
  • 41 Bartelink H, Horiot J C, Poortmans P M et al. Impact of a higher radiation dose on local control and survival in breast-conserving therapy of early breast cancer: 10-year results of the randomized boost versus no boost EORTC22881-10882 trial.  J Clin Oncol. 2007;  25 3259-3265
  • 42 Antonini N, Jones H, Horiot J C et al. Effect of age and radiation dose on local control after breast conserving treatment: EORTC trial 22881-10882.  Radiother Oncol. 2007;  82 265-271
  • 43 Hurkmans C, Admiraal M, van der Sangen M et al. Significance of breast boost volume changes during radiotherapy in relation to current clinical interobserver variations.  Radiother Oncol. 2009;  90 60-65
  • 44 Jacobson G, Betts V, Smith B. Change in volume of lumpectomy cavity during external-beam irradiation of the intact breast.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;  65 1161-1164
  • 45 Denham J W, Carter M L, Gill P G. Conservative treatment of breast cancer – where should the booster dose go?.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1988;  14 399-400
  • 46 Oh K S, Kong F M, Griffith K A et al. Planning the breast tumor bed boost: changes in the excision cavity volume and surgical scar location after breast-conserving surgery and whole-breast irradiation.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;  66 680-686
  • 47 Graham P, Fourquet A. Placing the boost in breast-conservation radiotherapy: A review of the role, indications and techniques for breast-boost radiotherapy.  Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2006;  18 210-219
  • 48 Kokubo M, Mitsumori M, Yamamoto C et al. Impact of boost irradiation with surgically placed radiopaque clips on local control in breast-conserving therapy.  Breast Cancer. 2001;  8 222-228
  • 49 Ringash J, Whelan T, Elliott E et al. Accuracy of ultrasound in localization of breast boost field.  Radiother Oncol. 2004;  72 61-66
  • 50 Goldberg H, Prosnitz R G, Olson J A et al. Definition of postlumpectomy tumor bed for radiotherapy boost field planning: CT versus surgical clips.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2005;  63 209-213
  • 51 Bernaerts A, Van D P , De SA jr.. Clip migration after vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy: a pitfall in preoperative wire localization.  JBR-BTR. 2007;  90 172-175
  • 52 Parikh J. Clip migration within 15 days of 11-gauge vacuum-assisted stereotactic breast biopsy.  Am J Roentgenol. 2005;  184 S43-S46
  • 53 Kass R, Kumar G, Klimberg V S et al. Clip migration in stereotactic biopsy.  Am J Surg. 2002;  184 325-331
  • 54 Intra M, Gatti G, Luini A et al. Surgical technique of intraoperative radiotherapy in conservative treatment of limited-stage breast cancer.  Arch Surg. 2002;  137 737-740
  • 55 Orecchia R, Ciocca M, Tosi G et al. Intraoperative electron beam radiotherapy (ELIOT) to the breast: a need for a quality assurance programme.  Breast. 2005;  14 541-546
  • 56 Reitsamer R, Peintinger F, Sedlmayer F et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy given as a boost after breast-conserving surgery in breast cancer patients.  Eur J Cancer. 2002;  38 1607-1610
  • 57 Dzierzanowski M, Melville K A, Barnes P J et al. Ductal carcinoma in situ in core biopsies containing invasive breast cancer: correlation with extensive intraductal component and lumpectomy margins.  J Surg Oncol. 2005;  90 71-76
  • 58 Van Goethem M, Schelfout K, Kersschot E et al. MR mammography is useful in the preoperative locoregional staging of breast carcinomas with extensive intraductal component.  Eur J Radiol. 2007;  62 273-282
  • 59 Gatzemeier W, Orecchia R, Gatti G et al. [Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) in treatment of breast carcinoma – a new therapeutic alternative within the scope of breast-saving therapy? Current status and future prospects. Report of experiences from the European Institute of Oncology (EIO), Mailand].  Strahlenther Onkol. 2001;  177 330-337
  • 60 Sedlmayer F, Fastner G, Merz F et al. IORT with electrons as boost strategy during breast conserving therapy in limited stage breast cancer: results of an ISIORT pooled analysis.  Strahlenther Onkol. 2007;  183 (Spec No 2) 32-34
  • 61 Lemanski C, Azria D, Thezenas S et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy given as a boost for early breast cancer: long-term clinical and cosmetic results.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;  64 1410-1415
  • 62 Reitsamer R, Peintinger F, Kopp M et al. Local recurrence rates in breast cancer patients treated with intraoperative electron-boost radiotherapy versus postoperative external-beam electron-boost irradiation. A sequential intervention study.  Strahlenther Onkol. 2004;  180 38-44
  • 63 Vrieling C, Collette L, Fourquet A EORTC Radiotherapy and Breast Cancer Cooperative Groups et al. The influence of patient, tumor and treatment factors on the cosmetic results after breast-conserving therapy in the EORTC ‘boost vs. no boost trial.  Radiother Oncol. 2000;  55 219-232
  • 64 Sauer R, Sautter-Bihl M L, Budach W et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation: consensus statement of 3 German Oncology societies.  Cancer. 2007;  110 1187-1194
  • 65 Sauer G, Strnad V, Kurzeder C et al. Partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery.  Strahlenther Onkol. 2005;  181 1-8
  • 66 Polgar C, Sulyok Z, Fodor J et al. Sole brachytherapy of the tumor bed after conservative surgery for T1 breast cancer: five-year results of a phase I–II study and initial findings of a randomized phase III trial.  J Surg Oncol. 2002;  80 121-128
  • 67 Nairz O, Deutschmann H, Kopp M et al. A dosimetric comparison of IORT techniques in limited-stage breast cancer.  Strahlenther Onkol. 2006;  182 342-348
  • 68 Veronesi U, Orecchia R, Luini R et al. Full-dose intraoperative radiotherapy with electrons during breast-conserving surgery: experience with 590 cases.  Ann Surg. 2005;  242 101-106

Dr. med. Marc D. Piroth

Klinik für Strahlentherapie (Direktor: Univ.-Prof. Dr. med. M. J. Eble)
Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen

Pauwelsstraße 30

52074 Aachen

Email: mpiroth@ukaachen.de