Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1245568
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
Intraindividual Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced MRI and Unenhanced SSFP Sequences of Stenotic and Non-stenotic Pulmonary Artery Diameters
Intraindividueller Vergleich von nativen SSFP-Sequenzen und kontrastmittelangehobenen MRT-Sequenzen zur Bestimmung der Diameter stenotischer und nicht stenotischer PulmonalarterienPublication History
received: 22.11.2009
accepted: 11.6.2010
Publication Date:
22 July 2010 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Ziel: Inwiefern stimmen Pulmonalarteriendiametermessungen (PAD) einer 3-D-kontrastmittelangehobenen MR-Angiografie (CE-MRA) mit denen einer 2-D-balanced-steady-state-free-precession-Sequenz (bSSFP) bei stenotischen und nicht stenotischen Pulmonalarterien (PA) überein? Material und Methoden: Insgesamt wurden 44 PA (30 nicht stenotische und 14 stenotische) von 23 konsekutiven Patienten mit einer CE-MRA und einer bSSFP untersucht. Die maximalen, transversalen PAD wurden von 2 unabhängigen Auswertern bestimmt. Ergebnisse: Es wurde kein signifikanter Unterschied zwischen CE-MRA und bSSFP bzgl. der PAD gefunden. Mittels Bland-Altman-Analyse wurde eine mittlere Abweichung von 0,07 ± 0,34 cm für nicht stenotische und 0,05 ± 0,3 cm für stenotische PA berechnet. Schlussfolgerung: PAD mit bSSFP liefern mit CE-MRA vergleichbare Messwerte ohne Anwendung ionisierender Strahlen oder dem Risiko von kontrastmittelassoziierten Nebenwirkungen.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the agreement of pulmonary artery diameters assessed with 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) and a 2D balanced steady-state-free precession sequence (bSSFP) in non-stenotic and stenotic pulmonary arteries (PA). Methods and Materials: 44 right and left PAs (30 non-stenotic and 14 stenotic) were examined in 23 consecutive patients by performing CE-MRA as well as bSSFP. Two independent readers determined the transverse diameters of the PA. Results: No significant difference in diameter measurements was found between CE-MRA and bSSFP (p = 0.8608 for the stenotic and p = 0.6208 for the non-stenotic PA). Bland-Altman analysis revealed good agreement between CE-MRA and bSSFP for both the non-stenotic (mean bias, 0.07 cm; with 95 % limits of agreement, ± 0.34 cm) and the stenotic (mean bias, 0.05 cm; with 95 % limits of agreement, ± 0.30 cm) PA. Conclusion: bSSFP allows rapid and accurate determination of PA diameters without the use of ionizing radiation and the risk of contrast media-associated side-effects.
Key words
vascular - MR angiography - pulmonary artery - SSFP
References
- 1 Baum D, Khoury G H, Ongley P A et al. Congenital Stenosis of the Pulmonary Artery Branches. Circulation. 1964; 29 680-687
- 2 Cohen M D, Johnson T H, Jennings S G. Tetralogy of fallot: a possible etiology for narrowing of the right pulmonary artery. Acad Radiol. 2009; 16 499-501
- 3 Yamada I, Shibuya H, Matsubara O et al. Pulmonary artery disease in Takayasu’s arteritis: angiographic findings. Am J Roentgenol. 1992; 159 263-269
- 4 Kusunose K, Yamada H, Tomita N et al. Serial imaging changes during treatment of Takayasu arteritis with pulmonary artery stenosis. Int J Cardiol. 2009; doi:10.1016/j.ijcard.2009.02.036
- 5 Castaner E, Gallardo X, Rimola J et al. Congenital and acquired pulmonary artery anomalies in the adult: radiologic overview. Radiographics. 2006; 26 349-371
- 6 Shields J J, Cho K J, Geisinger K R. Pulmonary artery constriction by mediastinal lymphoma simulating pulmonary embolus. Am J Roentgenol. 1980; 135 147-150
- 7 Geva T, Greil G F, Marshall A C et al. Gadolinium-enhanced 3-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of pulmonary blood supply in patients with complex pulmonary stenosis or atresia: comparison with x-ray angiography. Circulation. 2002; 106 473-478
- 8 Panos T (European Medicines Agency) .Puplic statement. Vasovist and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). Accessed: 10.03.2010. http://www.ema.europa.eu/pdfs/human/press/pus/4974107en.pdf
- 9 Scheffler K, Lehnhardt S. Principles and applications of balanced SSFP techniques. Eur Radiol. 2003; 13 2409-2418
- 10 Iozzelli A, D’Orta G, Aliprandi A et al. The value of true-FISP sequence added to conventional gadolinium-enhanced MRA of abdominal aorta and its major branches. Eur J Radiol. 2009; 72 489-493
- 11 Liu X, Berg N, Sheehan J et al. Renal transplant: nonenhanced renal MR angiography with magnetization-prepared steady-state free precession. Radiology. 2009; 251 535-542
- 12 Herborn C U, Watkins D M, Runge V M et al. Renal arteries: comparison of steady-state free precession MR angiography and contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology. 2006; 239 263-268
- 13 Francois C J, Tuite D, Deshpande V et al. Pulmonary vein imaging with unenhanced three-dimensional balanced steady-state free precession MR angiography: initial clinical evaluation. Radiology. 2009; 250 932-939
- 14 Carr J C, Nemcek A A, Abecassis Jr M et al. Preoperative evaluation of the entire hepatic vasculature in living liver donors with use of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and true fast imaging with steady-state precession. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003; 14 441-449
- 15 Krishnam M S, Tomasian A, Deshpande V et al. Noncontrast 3D steady-state free-precession magnetic resonance angiography of the whole chest using nonselective radiofrequency excitation over a large field of view: comparison with single-phase 3D contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol. 2008; 43 411-420
- 16 Pereles F S, McCarthy R M, Baskaran V et al. Thoracic aortic dissection and aneurysm: evaluation with nonenhanced true FISP MR angiography in less than 4 minutes. Radiology. 2002; 223 270-274
- 17 Tengg-Kobligk von H, Ley-Zaporozhan J, Henninger V et al. Intraindividueller Vergleich zwischen nativer und kontrastverstärkter MR-Angiografie der thorakalen Aorta. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2009; 181 230-236
- 18 Strouse P J, Hernandez R J, Beekman R H et al. Assessment of central pulmonary arteries in patients with obstructive lesions of the right ventricle: comparison of MR imaging and cineangiography. Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 167 1175-1183
- 19 Bland J M, Altman D G. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986; 1 307-310
- 20 Thomsen H S. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: A serious late adverse reaction to gadodiamide. Eur Radiol. 2006; 16 2619-2621
- 21 Shabana W M, Cohan R H, Ellis J H et al. Nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: a report of 29 cases. Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190 736-741
- 22 Heinrich M, Uder M. Nephrogene systemische Fibrose nach Anwendung gadoliniumhaltiger Kontrastmittel – ein Statuspapier zum aktuellen Stand des Wissens. Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2007; 179 613-617
- 23 Wertman R, Altun E, Martin D R et al. Risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis: evaluation of gadolinium chelate contrast agents at four American universities. Radiology. 2008; 248 799-806
- 24 Herborn C U, Jager-Booth I, Lodemann K P et al. Multizentrische Analyse der Verträglichkeit und klinischen Sicherheit des extrazellulären MR-Kontrastmittels Gadobenat-Dimeglumin (MultiHance). Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2009; 181 652-657
- 25 Kreitner K F, Kunz R P, Kalden P et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the thoracic aorta: experiences after 118 examinations with a standard dose contrast administration and different injection protocols. Eur Radiol. 2001; 11 1355-1363
- 26 Gatzoulis M A, Balaji S, Webber S A et al. Risk factors for arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death late after repair of tetralogy of Fallot: a multicentre study. Lancet. 2000; 356 975-981
- 27 Norton K I, Tong C, Glass R B et al. Cardiac MR imaging assessment following tetralogy of fallot repair. Radiographics. 2006; 26 197-211
- 28 Weiss F, Habermann C R, Lilje C et al. MRT der Pulmonalarterien bei Kindern nach arterieller Switch-Operation (ASO) bei Transposition der großen Gefäße (d-TGA). Fortschr Röntgenstr. 2005; 177 849-855
- 29 Tomasian A, Krishnam M S, Lohan D G et al. Adult Tetralogy of Fallot: quantitative assessment of pulmonary perfusion with time-resolved three dimensional magnetic resonance angiography. Invest Radiol. 2009; 44 31-37
Dr. Michael Groth
Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
Martinistr. 52
20246 Hamburg
Germany
Phone: ++ 49/40/4 28 03 40 29
Fax: ++ 49/40/4 28 03 38 02
Email: groth.michael@googlemail.com