Outcome in Second- versus First-Stage Cesarean Delivery in a Teaching Institution in Eastern India

ABSTRACT

We evaluated the maternal and perinatal complications of cesarean delivery performed in the second stage compared with the first stage of labor in nulliparous women. We performed a hospital-based cohort study in a teaching institution in Kolkata, West Bengal, India. The primary maternal outcomes measured included intraoperative surgical complications, duration of surgery, need for blood transfusion, wound infection, transfer to intensive care unit, and length of hospital stay. The neonatal outcomes included 5-minute Apgar score 3 or less, need for endotracheal intubation, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, fetal injury, septicemia, neonatal seizures, and neonatal death. There were 1702 cesarean deliveries performed in the first stage and 124 cases in the second stage. Cesarean deliveries performed in the second stage were associated with longer operation time and increased need for blood transfusion, rates of wound infection, intraoperative complications, and need for transfer to intensive care unit. Neonatal complications included significantly low Apgar score at 5 minutes, increased neonatal death, admission to neonatal intensive care unit, increased need for intubation, septicemia, neonatal seizures, and fetal injury (all having p < 0.05). Cesarean deliveries performed in the second stage of labor were associated with higher rates of maternal and neonatal complications.

KEYWORDS

Cesarean delivery - second stage - maternal - neonatal outcome

REFERENCES

• 1 Murphy D J, Liebling R E, Verity L, Swingler R, Patel R. Early maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with operative delivery in second stage of labour: a cohort study.  Lancet. 2001;  358 1203-1207
• 2 Fasubaa O B, Ezechi O C, Orji E O et al.. Delivery of the impacted head of the fetus at caesarean section after prolonged obstructed labour: a randomised comparative study of two methods.  J Obstet Gynaecol. 2002;  22 375-378
• 3 Allen V M, O'Connell C M, Baskett T F. Maternal and perinatal morbidity of caesarean delivery at full cervical dilatation compared with caesarean delivery in the first stage of labour.  BJOG. 2005;  112 986-990
• 4 Murphy D J. Failure to progress in the second stage of labour.  Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2001;  13 557-561
• 5 Murphy D J, Liebling R E, Patel R, Verity L, Swingler R. Cohort study of operative delivery in the second stage of labour and standard of obstetric care.  BJOG. 2003;  110 610-615
• 6 Alexander J M, Leveno K J, Rouse D J National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU) et al. Comparison of maternal and infant outcomes from primary cesarean delivery during the second compared with first stage of labor.  Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  109 917-921
• 7 Rodriguez A I, Porter K B, O'Brien W F. Blunt versus sharp expansion of the uterine incision in low-segment transverse cesarean section.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  171 1022-1025
• 8 Cebekulu L, Buchmann E J. Complications associated with cesarean section in the second stage of labor.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2006;  95 110-114
• 9 Selo-Ojeme D S, Sathiyathasan S, Fayyaz M. Caesearean delivery at full cervical dilatation versus caesarean delivery in the first stage of labor: comparison of maternal and perinatal morbidity.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2008;  278 245-249
• 10 Gifford D S, Morton S C, Fiske M, Keesey J, Keeler E, Kahn K L. Lack of progress in labor as a reason for cesarean.  Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  95 589-595
• 11 Spencer C, Murphy D, Bewley S. Caesarean delivery in the second stage of labour.  BMJ. 2006;  333 613-614
• 12 Cunningham F G, Leveno K J, Bloom S L et al. William's Obstetrics 22nd ed. New York; McGraw Hill 2005: 434-435