5 December 2009 - Edinburgh - UK – Chairman of ECMUS to the Board of Directors' Meeting

Table of Contents

1. Rationale for the addition of a sentence about the use of first trimester Doppler to the EFSUMB safety statement.

Prof Gail ter Haar ECMUS Committee Chairman

The ECMUS safety statement feels that pulsed Doppler ultrasound should only be used in the first trimester when exposure levels and times are carefully controlled (see yellow highlight in statement below). The introduction of the 11-13+6 weeks scan to screen for fetal chromosomal anomalies has challenged this safety statement. Pulsed Doppler of the fetal tricuspid valves, and in the ductus venosus, can be used to refine risk assessment for Down's syndrome and other trisomies. This practice may be of benefit to the fetus if the use of pulsed Doppler will reduce the need for invasive testing, and, thus, reduce the risk of procedure related spontaneous abortions. However, it must be remembered that high mechanical and thermal indices are associated with pulsed Doppler, and thermal effects at bone/soft tissue interfaces of high exposure levels cannot be excluded. While this may present an acceptable risk if Doppler is used after serum screening and/or measurements of nuchal translucency have revealed a high risk, we consider it unacceptable for pulsed Doppler to be used routinely in all pregnancies, or for extended times in normal pregnancies for the purpose of training, qualifying for accreditation, or where there is no perceived medical benefit for the fetus. If Doppler were to have an adverse fetal effect, we could hypothesize that it would be most likely to be caused at early gestation where there is most rapid cell division, and where the fetal blood flow is less well developed than later and hence less likely to dissipate heat induced by Doppler examinations. Further, these examinations are at the level of the ductus venosus or fetal heart very close to a forming bone (i.e. spine)/soft tissue interface where a heating effect would be greatest. The main reasons for advocating restricted use of routine Doppler ultrasound in early gestation is that we don't know whether Doppler ultrasound is safe, that the first trimester is a particularly vulnerable period of fetal life, and no medical benefit to such routine examinations has been demonstrated.

European Committee of Medical Ultrasound Safety (ECMUS)

This document is the 2006 revision of the EFSUMB Clinically Safety Statement. A Safety Statement has been published by EFSUMB annually since 1994. The text is deliberately brief, and gives a concise overview of safety in the use of diagnostic ultrasound. The 2008 Statement is the fifth revision of the Statement, the previous revisions being those published in 1998, 2002, 2003 and 2006.

Clinical Safety Statement for Diagnostic Ultrasound

Diagnostic ultrasound has been widely used in clinical medicine for many years with no proven deleterious effects. However, if used imprudently, diagnostic ultrasound is capable of producing harmful effects. The range of clinical applications is becoming wider, the number of patients undergoing ultrasound examinations is increasing and new techniques with higher acoustic output levels are being introduced. It is therefore essential to maintain vigilance to ensure the continued safe use of ultrasound.

Ultrasound examinations should only be performed by competent personnel who are trained and updated in safety matters. It is also important that ultrasound devices are appropriately maintained.

Ultrasound produces heating, pressure changes and mechanical disturbances in tissue. Diagnostic levels of ultrasound can produce temperature rises that are hazardous to sensitive organs and the embryo/fetus. Biological effects of non-thermal origin have been reported in animals but, to date, no such effects have been demonstrated in humans, except when a microbubble contrast agent is present.

The Thermal index (TI) is an on-screen guide to the user of the potential for tissue heating. The Mechanical index (MI) is an on-screen guide of the likelihood and magnitude of nonthermal effects. Users should regularly check both indices while scanning and should adjust the machine controls to keep them as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA principle) without compromising the diagnostic value of the examination. Where low values cannot be achieved, examination times should kept as short as possible. Guidelines issued by several ultrasound societies are available.

Some modes are more likely than others to produce significant acoustic outputs and, when using these modes, particular care should be taken to regularly check the TI and MI indices. Spectral pulse wave Doppler and Doppler imaging modes (colour flow imaging and power Doppler imaging) in particular can produce more tissue heating and hence higher TI values, as can B-mode techniques involving coded transmissions. Tissue harmonic imaging mode can sometimes involve higher MI values. 3D (three dimensional) imaging does not introduce any additional safety considerations, particularly if there are significant pauses during scanning to study or manipulate the reconstructed images. However, 4D scanning (real-time 3D) involves continuous exposure and users should guard against the temptation to prolong examination times unduly in an effort to improve the recorded image sequence beyond that which is necessary for diagnostic purposes.

Ultrasound exposure during pregnancy

The embryo/fetus in early pregnancy is known to be particularly sensitive. In view of this and the fact that there is very little information currently available regarding possible subtle biological effects of diagnostic levels of ultrasound on the developing human embryo or fetus, care should be taken to limit the exposure time and the Thermal and Mechanical Indices to the minimum commensurate with an acceptable clinical assessment.

Temperature rises are likely to be greatest at bone surfaces and adjacent soft tissues. With increasing mineralisation of fetal bones, the possibility of heating sensitive tissues such as brain and spinal cord increases. Extra vigilance is advised when scanning such critical fetal structures, at any stage in pregnancy. Based on scientific evidence of ultrasound-induced biological effects to date, there is no reason to withhold diagnostic scanning during pregnancy, provided it is medically indicated and is used prudently by fully trained operators. This includes routine scanning of pregnant women. However, Doppler ultrasound examinations should not be used routinely in the first trimester of pregnancy. The power levels used for fetal heart rate monitoring (cardiotocography - CTG) are sufficiently low that the use of this modality is not contra-indicated on safety grounds, even when it is to be used for extended periods.

Safety considerations for other sensitive organs

Particular care should be taken to reduce the risk of thermal and non-thermal effects during investigations of the eye and when carrying out neonatal cardiac and cranial investigations.

Ultrasound contrast agents (UCA)

These usually take the form of stable gas filled microbubbles, which can potentially produce cavitation or microstreaming, the risk of which increases with MI value. Data from small animal models suggest that microvascular damage or rupture is possible. Caution should be considered for the use of UCA in tissues where damage to microvasculature could have serious clinical implications, such as in the brain, the eye, and the neonate. As in all diagnostic ultrasound procedures, the MI and TI values should be continually checked and kept as low as possible. It is possible to induce premature ventricular contractions in contrast enhanced echocardiography when using high MI and end-systolic triggering. Users should take appropriate precautions in these circumstances and avoid cardiac examinations in patients with recent acute coronary syndrome or clinically unstable ischaemic heart disease. The use of contrast agents should be avoided 24 hours prior to extra-corporeal shock wave therapy.

ECMUS 2009.

2. 2nd Edition of Safety of Medical Ultrasound

BMUS and BIR (British Institute of Radiology) published the 1st edition of this book in 2000. This was sent free of charge to all BMUS members, and has become a well referenced text. It is now necessary to update this volume as safety issues have moved on. BMUS needs some sponsorship to be able to publish a 2nd edition. EFSUMB will make a contribution to the typesetting cost to have the book published on our website.

The printing element assumed that we would distribute the book to all BMUS members and EUROSON 2010 delegates. If fewer copies are required then the cost could be significantly reduced. Clearly if it were web based this would disappear completely. The National Physical Laboratories in UK have agreed to provide some sponsorship. This might be used to print the hard copy, while EFSUMB could perhaps prepare a web based version.

3. Ongoing ECMUS activities

28 safety related articles are currently under review. These are published in the EFSUMB newsletter, and on the website.

I. Tutorial Articles:

These are designed to be teaching articles aimed at the clinical user without a background in Physics. Suggestions for future topics will be gratefully received!

II. Literature reviews

III. Maintenance of Safety statements

Existing safety statements are reviewed annually and revised as necessary. (Clinical safety statement; Souvenir scanning statement)

IV. Congresses

A safety debate on the wisdom of using Doppler in the first trimester has been organised for EUROSON in Edinburgh. (Christoph Brezinka against; Yves Ville for).

Post it pads with a safety message, advertising safety on the EFSUMB website have been prepared for EUROSON.

Gail ter Haar
ECMUS Committee Chairman