Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2010; 70(10): 803-811
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1250410
Originalarbeit

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Lebensqualität nach intraoperativer Radiotherapie (IORT) als Boost beim Mammakarzinom

Quality of Life after Intraoperative Radiotherapy (IORT) as a Boost in Patients with Early Breast CancerE. Blank1 , G. Welzel1 , M. Sütterlin2 , F. Wenz1
  • 1Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim
  • 2Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim
Further Information

Publication History

eingereicht 4.8.2010 revidiert 18.8.2010

akzeptiert 6.9.2010

Publication Date:
04 November 2010 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Fragestellung: Die intraoperative Radiotherapie (IORT) als Boost während einer brusterhaltenden Therapie (BET) kommt weltweit immer häufiger zum Einsatz. In dieser Analyse wurden die Lebensqualität und Spätfolgen nach IORT-Boost und perkutaner Bestrahlung (EBRT) retrospektiv bei einem Querschnittskollektiv untersucht. Material und Methodik: Zwischen 2/2002 und 12/2006 erhielten 142 Patientinnen (medianes Alter 63 Jahre) einen IORT-Boost (20 Gy; INTRABEAM-System). Nach abgeschlossener Wundheilung und/oder Chemotherapie wurde mit der EBRT begonnen (46–50 Gy). Die Lebensqualitätserhebung erfolgte mittels der standardisierten und validierten Fragebögen QLQ‐C‐30 und QLQ-BR-23 im Median 34 Monate nach Ende der EBRT bei 103 Patientinnen. Es erfolgte alle 6–12 Monate eine klinische Nachsorge, wobei Spättoxizitäten anhand des LENT SOMA Scores erfasst wurden. Ergebnisse: Bei einer medianen Nachbeobachtungszeit von 32 Monaten ergaben die Spättoxizität und die Lebensqualität gute/sehr gute Ergebnisse nach IORT-Boost. Die allgemeine Lebensqualität fiel gut aus und unterschied sich nicht klinisch relevant (> 10 Punkte Unterschied) von einer altersadjustierten deutschen Normstichprobe bei statistisch signifikant niedrigerem Mittelwert (58,66 vs. 64,77 Punkte; p = 0,016). Patientinnen mit höhergradigen Toxizitäten hatten signifikant mehr Emesis/Nausea (p = 0,018), Obstipation (p = 0,002), Brustsymptome (p = 0,008), Armsymptome (p = 0,013) und eine gering schlechtere allgemeine Lebensqualität (60,58 vs. 56,74 Punkte). Den stärksten Einfluss zeigten Schmerzen > °II. Zufriedene Patientinnen (89 %) hatten signifikant weniger Brust- und Armsymptome (p < 0,001) und wiesen weniger höhergradige Spättoxizitäten auf (p = 0,004). Schlussfolgerung: Patientinnen mit IORT-Boost zeigen eine gute Lebensqualität nach einer medianen Nachsorgezeit von fast 3 Jahren. Höhergradige Toxizitäten übten in nur wenigen Bereichen einen negativen Einfluss auf die Lebensqualität aus.

Abstract

Purpose: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is increasingly used as a boost during breast conserving surgery. In a retrospective cross-sectional analysis, we assessed the Quality of Life (QoL) and late toxicity in women treated with an IORT boost followed by whole breast irradiation (WBRT). Material and Methods: Between 02/2002 and 12/2006, 142 patients (median age: 63 years) were treated with an IORT boost (20 Gy; INTRABEAM System) and WBRT (46–50 Gy) after completed wound healing or chemotherapy. After a median interval of 34 months after WBRT, QoL data were assessed in 103 patients using two reliable, validated questionnaires: the QLQ‐C30 and QLQ-BR23. We also carried out clinical examinations every 6–12 months and documented late effects according to the LENT SOMA scale. Results: At a median follow-up of 32 months most toxicity and QoL scores were good/excellent and QoL showed no clinically relevant difference of > 10 points compared to an age-adjusted population. However, our patients had significantly lower ratings for global health/QoL (58.66 vs. 64.77; p = 0.016). Patients with higher grade toxicities reported significantly more emesis/nausea (p = 0.018), constipation (p = 0.002), breast (p = 0.008) and arm symptoms (p = 0.013) and showed a worse QoL (56.74 vs. 60.58 points). Pain > °II had the greatest impact. Satisfied patients (89 %) reported fewer breast and arm symptoms (p < 0.001) and fewer higher grade toxicities (p = 0.004). Conclusion: Patients with an IORT boost had a good QoL at a median follow-up of nearly three years. Higher grade toxicity had a small impact on QoL.

Literatur

  • 1 Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, Bauer L, Kehrer T et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) as a boost in patients with early-stage breast cancer – acute toxicity.  Onkologie. 2006;  29 77-82
  • 2 Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, Bauer L, Scheda A et al. Long-term toxicity of an intraoperative radiotherapy boost using low energy X-rays during breast-conserving surgery.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;  66 377-381
  • 3 Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, Scheda A, Steil V et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) for breast cancer using the Intrabeam system.  Tumori. 2005;  91 339-345
  • 4 Kraus-Tiefenbacher U, Steil V, Bauer L et al. A novel mobile device for intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT).  Onkologie. 2003;  26 596-598
  • 5 Reitsamer R, Sedlmayer F, Kopp M et al. The Salzburg concept of intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer: results and considerations.  Int J Cancer. 2006;  118 2882-2887
  • 6 Sauer R, Wenz F, Strnad V et al. [Partial breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer].  Strahlenther Onkol. 2005;  181 417-423
  • 7 Vaidya J S, Baum M, Tobias J S et al. Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT) yields very low recurrence rates when given as a boost.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006;  66 1335-1338
  • 8 Vaidya J S, Tobias J S, Baum M et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy for breast cancer.  Lancet Oncol. 2004;  5 165-173
  • 9 Vaidya J S, Joseph D J, Tobias J S et al. Targeted intraoperative radiotherapy versus whole breast radiotherapy for breast cancer (TARGIT-A trial): an international, prospective, randomised, non-inferiority phase 3 trial.  Lancet. 2010;  376 91-102
  • 10 Goldhirsch A, Wood W, Gelber R et al. Progress and promise: highlights of the international expert consensus on the primary therapy of early breast cancer 2007.  Ann Oncol. 2007;  18 1133-1144
  • 11 LENT SOMA tables.  Radiother Oncol. 1995;  35 17-60
  • 12 Seegenschmiedt M H. Interdisciplinary documentation of treatment side effects in oncology. Present status and perspectives.  Strahlenther Onkol. 1998;  174 (Suppl. 3) 25-29
  • 13 Aaronson N K, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;  85 365-376
  • 14 McLachlan S A, Devins G M, Goodwin P J. Validation of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) as a measure of psychosocial function in breast cancer patients.  Eur J Cancer. 1998;  34 510-517
  • 15 Schwarz R, Hinz A. Reference data for the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30 in the general German population.  Eur J Cancer. 2001;  37 1345-1351
  • 16 Awadalla A W, Ohaeri J U, Gholoum A et al. Factors associated with quality of life of outpatients with breast cancer and gynecologic cancers and their family caregivers: a controlled study.  BMC Cancer. 2007;  7 102
  • 17 Montazeri A. Health-related quality of life in breast cancer patients: a bibliographic review of the literature from 1974 to 2007.  J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2008;  27 32
  • 18 Sauer R, Sautter-Bihl M L, Budach W et al. Accelerated partial breast irradiation: consensus statement of 3 German Oncology societies.  Cancer. 2007;  110 1187-1194
  • 19 Herskind C, Griebel J, Kraus-Tiefenbacher U et al. Sphere of equivalence – a novel target volume concept for intraoperative radiotherapy using low-energy X rays.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol. 2008;  72 1575-1581
  • 20 Wenz F, Welzel G, Blank E et al. Intraoperative Radiotherapy as a boost during breast-conserving surgery using low-kilovoltage x-rays: the first 5 years of experience with a novel approach.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;  77 1309-1314
  • 21 Back M, Ahern V, Delaney G et al. Absence of adverse early quality of life outcomes of radiation therapy in breast conservation therapy for early breast cancer.  Australas Radiol. 2005;  49 39-43
  • 22 Waljee J F, Hu E S, Ubel P A et al. Effect of esthetic outcome after breast-conserving surgery on psychosocial functioning and quality of life.  J Clin Oncol. 2008;  26 3331-3337
  • 23 Belkacemi Y, Chauvet M P, Giard S et al. Partial breast irradiation as sole therapy for low risk breast carcinoma: early toxicity, cosmesis and quality of life results of a MammoSite brachytherapy phase II study.  Radiother Oncol. 2009;  90 23-29
  • 24 Lemanski C, Azria D, Gourgon-Bourgade S et al. Intraoperative radiotherapy in early-stage breast cancer: results of the Montpellier Phase II trial.  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;  76 698-703
  • 25 Arraras J I, Manterola A, Dominguez M A et al. Impact of radiotherapy on the quality of life of elderly patients with localized breast cancer. A prospective study.  Clin Transl Oncol. 2008;  10 498-504
  • 26 Härtl K, Janni W, Kästner R et al. Impact of medical and demographic factors on long-term quality of life and body image of breast cancer patients.  Ann Oncol. 2003;  14 1064-1071
  • 27 Lee T S, Kilbreath S L, Refshauge K M et al. Quality of life of women treated with radiotherapy for breast cancer.  Support Care Cancer. 2008;  16 399-405
  • 28 Ishiyama H, Niino K, Hosoya T et al. Results of a questionnaire survey for symptom of late complications caused by radiotherapy in breast conserving therapy.  Breast Cancer (Tokyo, Japan). 2006;  13 197-201
  • 29 Stanton A L, Krishnan L, Collins C A. Form or function? Part 1. Subjective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy.  Cancer. 2001;  91 2273-2281
  • 30 Krishnan L, Stanton A L, Collins C A et al. Form or function? Part 2. Objective cosmetic and functional correlates of quality of life in women treated with breast-conserving surgical procedures and radiotherapy.  Cancer. 2001;  91 2282-2287
  • 31 Whelan T J, Levine M, Julian J et al. The effects of radiation therapy on quality of life of women with breast carcinoma: results of a randomized trial. Ontario Clinical Oncology Group.  Cancer. 2000;  88 2260-2266
  • 32 Sneeuw K C, Aaronson N K, Yarnold J R et al. Cosmetic and functional outcomes of breast conserving treatment for early stage breast cancer. 2. Relationship with psychosocial functioning.  Radiother Oncol. 1992;  25 160-166
  • 33 Warm M, Gatermann C, Kates R et al. Postoperative sense of well-being and quality of life in breast cancer patients do not depend on type of primary surgery.  Onkologie. 2008;  31 99-104
  • 34 Kissane D W, Clarke D M, Ikin J et al. Psychological morbidity and quality of life in Australian women with early-stage breast cancer: a cross-sectional survey.  Med J Aust. 1998;  169 192-196
  • 35 Poulsen B, Graversen H P, Beckmann J et al. A comparative study of post-operative psychosocial function in women with primary operable breast cancer randomized to breast conservation therapy or mastectomy.  Eur J Surg Oncol. 1997;  23 327-334
  • 36 Fehlauer F, Tribius S, Mehnert A et al. Health-related quality of life in long term breast cancer survivors treated with breast conserving therapy: impact of age at therapy.  Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2005;  92 217-222
  • 37 Budischewski K, Fischbeck S, Mose S. Quality of life of breast cancer patients in the course of adjuvant radiotherapy.  Support Care Cancer. 2008;  16 299-304
  • 38 Zebrack B J, Yi J, Petersen L et al. The impact of cancer and quality of life for long-term survivors.  Psychooncology. 2008;  17 891-900

Dr. med. Elena Blank

Klinik für Strahlentherapie und Radioonkologie
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim

Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1–3

68167 Mannheim

Email: elena.blank@umm.de