Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1253406
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
The Efficacy of External Neuromyogenic Stimulation on Neuromuscular Anorectal Incontinence
Publication History
received October 08, 2009
accepted after revision February 22, 2010
Publication Date:
25 May 2010 (online)
![](https://www.thieme-connect.de/media/ejps/201004/lookinside/thumbnails/10.1055-s-0030-1253406-1.jpg)
Abstract
Aim: This study reports on the preliminary results of external neuromyogenic electrostimulation (ENS) for the treatment of anorectal continence problems.
Patients and Methods: A total of seventeen paients with anorectal malformations (n=11), Hirschsprung's disease (n=5) or pelvi-perineal trauma (n=1) were included in the study. All patients were evaluated using clinical, radiological, and manometric methods prior to ENS. The Holschneider Continence Scale and the Quality of Life (QOL) Score were used for clinical assessment. The ENS stimulator is a two-channel ambulatory device providing a pulse current. ENS was performed by parents in a home setting twice daily for 6 weeks using skin electrodes attached to the sides of the anus. Three of the 11 preset programs were used (lack of sensitivity, pelvic floor work out and building up endurance). Clinical and manometric variables were reevaluated following completion of the 6-week program.
Results: Mean age was 9.7 years (range 5–22 years). The Holschneider Continence Score increased from a mean value of 5.3±3.2 to 12.4±1.7 (p=0.002) and mean QOL scores increased from 5.6±2.3 to 11.6±1.8 (p=0.01) following ENS. Mean anal canal resting pressures prior to ENS were 20.3±6 cmH2O and increased to 28.7±14.1 cmH2O after 6 weeks (p>0.05). Maximum voluntary squeeze pressures before and after ENS were 56.1±16.7 cmH2O and 100.7±16.9 cmH2O respectively (p=0.001).
Conclusion: Preliminary results for ENS have shown that patients achieved higher maximum voluntary squeeze pressures, and showed a marked improvement in their continence and QOL scores. Given the advantage of ambulatory use in a home setting, the ENS seems promising in terms of achieving improved anorectal continence in selected patients.
Key words
external neuromyogenic electrostimulation - anal continence - fecal incontinence
References
- 1 Achenbach TM, Edelbrock CS. Psychopathology of childhood. Ann Rev Psychol. 1984; 35 227-256
- 2 Appell RA. Electrical stimulation for the treatment of urinary incontinence. Urology. 1998; 51 24-26
- 3 Bai Y, Yuan Z, Wang W. et al . Quality of life for children with fecal incontinence after surgically corrected anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg. 2000; 35 (3) 462-464
- 4 Caldwell KP, Flack FC. Anal incontinence. Lancet. 1964 Oct 3; 171 761-762
- 5 Carson JA, Barnes PD, Tunell WP. et al . Imperforate anus: The neurological implication of sacral abnormalities. J Pediatr Surg. 1984; 19 838-842
- 6 Ganio E, Luc AR, Clerico G. et al . Sacral nerve stimulation for treatment of fecal incontinence: a novel approach for intractable fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum. 2001; 44 (5) 619-629 discussion 629–631
- 7 Hassink EA, Rieu PN, Brugman AT. et al . Quality of life after operatively corrected high anorectal malformation: a long-term follow-up study of patients aged 18 years and older. J Pediatr Surg. 1994; 29 (6) 773-768
- 8 Holschenider AM. Elektromanometrie des Enddarms. Baltimore MD: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1983: 213-218
- 9 Holschneider A, Hutson J, Pena A. et al . Preliminary report on the International Conference for the Development of Standards for the Treatment of Anorectal Malformations. J Pediatr Surg. 2005; 40 (10) 1521-1526
- 10 Jost WH. Electrostimulation in fecal incontinence: relevance of the sphincteric compound muscle action potential. Dis Colon Rectum. 1998; 41 (5) 590-592
- 11 Kiessewetter WB, Sukarochana K, Sieber WK. The frequency of aganglionosis associated with imperforate anus. Surgery. 1965; 58 (5) 877-880
- 12 Leung MW, Wong BP, Leung AK. et al . Electrical stimulation and biofeedback exercise of pelvic floor muscle for children with fecal incontinence after surgery for anorectal malformation. Pediatr Surg Int. 2006; 22 975-978
- 13 Lorenz EP, Wondzinski A. Results of conservative and surgical therapy of anal incontinence 1974–1992 patient sample. Zentralbl Chir. 1996; 121 (8) 669-675
- 14 Matzel KE, Stadelmaier U, Hohenfellner M. et al . Electrical stimulation of sacral spinal nerves for treatment of faecal incontinence. Lancet. 1995; 346 1124-1127
- 15 Ninan GK, Puri P. Levatorplasty using a posterior sagittal approach in secondary faecal incontinence. Pediatr Surg Int. 1994; 9 17-20
- 16 Norris WJ, Brophy TW, Brayton D. Imperforate anus: a case series and preliminary report of one-stage abdomino-perineal operation. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1949; 88 623-634
- 17 Rintala R, Mildh L, Lindahl H. Fecal continence and quality of life in adult patients with an operated low anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg. 1992; 27 (7) 902-905
- 18 Rintala R, Mildh L, Lindahl H. Fecal continence and quality of life for adult patients with an operated high or intermediate anorectal malformation. J Pediatr Surg. 1994; 29 (6) 777-780
- 19 Squire R, Kiely EM, Carr B. et al . The clinicial application of the Malone antegrade colonic enema. J Pediatr Surg. 1993; 28 1012-1015
Correspondence
Assoc. Prof. Orkan Ergun
Ege University School of
Medicine
Pediatric Surgery
35100 Izmir
Turkey
Phone: +90 232 390 28 14
Fax: +90 232 390 28 02
Email: orkan.ergun@ege.edu.tr