Feasibility of stomach exploration with a guided capsule endoscope

Background and study aims: Video capsule endoscopy has been established in diagnosis of small-bowel disease and has been evaluated for esophageal pathology and recently for colorectal diagnostics. Gastric capsule endoscopy has not hitherto been feasible due to the stomach’s large surface area and volume. We present the first application of a magnetically navigated capsule in the human stomach.

Patients and methods: 29 volunteers and 24 patients (men 42, women 11; mean age 47.5 years) were included in a feasibility study. Low-level magnetic fields were used to maneuver the double-sensor video capsule within the human stomach with an air-water interface provided by ingestion of 1300 ml water within 1 hour before examination. Visualization of all parts of the stomach was attempted; time for visualization was recorded, and a subjective assessment of completeness of visualization was documented.

Results: There was technical failure in one individual; thus technical success rate was 98 %. In the 52 remaining cases, examiners assessed that the antrum, body, fundus, and cardia were fully visualized in 98 %, 96 %, 73 % and 75 %, respectively. Mean duration of examinations was 30 minutes (range 8 – 50), with a longer time (mean 37 minutes) for volunteers for study reasons. In total, 30 findings were identified: 14 were detected by both gastroscopy and capsule, 10 lesions were identified by guided capsule examination only, 6 by gastroscopy only. No significant capsule-related adverse events occurred.

Conclusion: Magnetically navigated video capsule endoscopy appears to be feasible and sufficiently accurate for gastric examination. It may permit endoscopic examinations that are more patient-friendly and without sedation. Comparative studies are under way.

References

• 1 Liao Z, Gao R, Xu C, Li Z S. Indications and detection, completion, and retention rates of small-bowel capsule endoscopy: a systematic review.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2010;  71 280-286
• 2 Triester S L, Leighton J A, Leontiadis G I. et al . A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with non-stricturing small bowel Crohn’s disease.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2006;  101 954-964
• 3 Triester S L, Leighton J A, Leontiadis G I. et al . A meta-analysis of the yield of capsule endoscopy compared to other diagnostic modalities in patients with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2005;  100 2407-2418
• 4 Ladas S D, Triantafyllou K, Spada C. European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) . Guideline on clinical use of video capsule endoscopy to investigate small-bowel, esophageal and colonic diseases.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 220-227
• 5 Heresbach D, Leray E, d’Halluin P N. et al . Diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy versus conventional upper digestive endoscopy for suspected esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 93-97
• 6 Sharma V K, Eliakim R, Sharma P. et al . ICCE consensus for esophageal capsule endoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 1060-1064
• 7 Rey J F. Future perspectives for esophageal and colorectal capsule endoscopy: dreams or reality?. In: Niwa H, Tajiri H, Nakajima N, Yasuda K, eds New challenges in gastrointestinal endoscopy. Tokyo; Springer 2008: 55-64
• 8 Van Gossum A, Munoz Navas M, Fernandez-Urien I. et al . Capsule endoscopy versus colonoscopy for the detection of polyps and cancer.  N Engl J Med. 2009;  361 264-270
• 9 Eliakim R, Yassin K, Niv Y. et al . Prospective multicenter performance evaluation of the second-generation colon capsule compared with colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 1026-1031 ,  [Epub 2009 Dec 4]
• 10 Spada C, Hassan C, Marmo R. et al . Meta-analysis shows colon capsule endoscopy is effective in detecting colorectal polyps.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. ,  [Epub ahead of print 2010 Mar 6]
• 11 Ciuti G, Donlin R, Valdastri P. et al . Robotic versus manual control in magnetic steering of an endoscopic capsule.  Endoscopy. 2010;  42 148-152 ,  [Epub 2009 Dec 16]
• 12 Menciassi A, Valdastri P, Quaglia C. et al . Wireless steering mechanism with magnetic actuation for an endoscopic capsule.  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;  2009 1204-1207
• 13 Valdastri P, Quaglia C, Susilo E. et al . Wireless therapeutic endoscopic capsule: in vivo experiment.  Endoscopy. 2008;  40 979-982 ,  [Epub 2008 Dec 8]
• 14 Swain P, Toor A, Volke F. et al . Remote magnetic manipulation of a wireless capsule endoscope in the esophagus and stomach of humans.  Gastrointest Endosc. ,  [Epub ahead of print 2010 Apr 22 ]
• 15 Neu B, Wettschureck E, Rösch T. Is esophageal capsule endoscopy feasible? Results of a pilot study.  Endoscopy. 2003;  35 957-961
• 16 Ahn D, Guturu P. Meta-analysis of capsule endoscopy in patients diagnosed or suspected with esophageal varices.  World J Gastroenterol. 2010;  16 785-786
• 17 Bhardwaj A, Hollenbeak C S, Pooran N, Mathew A. A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of esophageal capsule endoscopy for Barrett’s esophagus in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2009;  104 1533-1539 ,  [Epub 2009 Apr 21]
• 18 Cheon J H, Kim Y S, Lee I S. et al . Korean Gut Image Study Group. Can we predict spontaneous capsule passage after retention? A nationwide study to evaluate the incidence and clinical outcomes of capsule retention.  Endoscopy. 2007;  39 1046-1052
• 19 Cave D, Legnani P, de Franchis R, Lewis B S. International Conference on Capsule Endoscopy (ICCE) . ICCE consensus for capsule retention.  Endoscopy. 2005;  37 1065-1067
• 20 Fujimori S, Gudis K, Takahashi Y. et al . Distribution of small intestinal mucosal injuries as a result of NSAID administration.  Eur J Clin Invest. ,  [Epub ahead of print 2010 Apr 14]
• 21 Shiotani A, Haruma K, Nishi R. et al . Randomized, double-blind, pilot study of geranylgeranylacetone versus placebo in patients taking low-dose enteric-coated aspirin. Low-dose aspirin-induced small bowel damage.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 2010;  45 292-298
• 22 Niwa Y, Nakamura M, Miyahara R. et al . Geranylgeranylacetone protects against diclofenac-induced gastric and small intestinal mucosal injuries in healthy subjects: a prospective randomized placebo-controlled double-blind cross-over study.  Digestion. 2009;  80 260-266 ,  [Epub 2009 Oct 16]
• 23 Smecuol E, Pinto Sanchez M I, Suarez A. et al . Low-dose aspirin affects the small bowel mucosa: results of a pilot study with a multidimensional assessment.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;  7 524-529 ,  [Epub 2008 Dec 27]
• 24 Endo H, Hosono K, Inamori M. et al . Incidence of small bowel injury induced by low-dose aspirin: a crossover study using capsule endoscopy in healthy volunteers.  Digestion. 2009;  79 44-51 ,  [Epub 2009 Feb 26]
• 25 Fujimori S, Seo T, Gudis K. et al . Prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced small-intestinal injury by prostaglandin: a pilot randomized controlled trial evaluated by capsule endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;  69 1339-1346 ,  [Epub 2009 Feb 24]
• 26 Maiden L, Thjodleifsson B, Seigal A. et al . Long-term effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and cyclooxygenase-2 selective agents on the small bowel: a cross-sectional capsule enteroscopy study.  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007;  5 1040-1045 ,  [Epub 2007 Jul 10]