Clinical features and outcomes of delayed perforation after endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer

Perforation is a major complication of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric cancer (EGC). However, there have been no reports on delayed perforation after ESD for EGC. We aimed to elucidate the incidence and outcomes of delayed perforation after ESD. Clinical courses in 1159 consecutive patients with 1329 EGCs who underwent ESD were investigated. Delayed perforation occurred in six patients (0.45 %). All these patients had complete en bloc resection without intraoperative perforation during ESD. Five of six perforations were located in the upper third of the stomach, while one lesion was found in the middle third. Symptoms of peritoneal irritation with rebound tenderness presented within 24 h after ESD in all cases. One patient did not require surgery because the symptoms were localized, and recovered with conservative antibiotic therapy by nasogastric tube placement. The remaining five patients required emergency surgery. There was no mortality in this case series.

• 1 Ohkuwa M, Hosokawa K, Boku N. et al . New endoscopic treatment for intramucosal gastric tumors using an insulated-tip diathermic knife.  Endoscopy. 2001;  33 221-266
• 2 Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M. et al . Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers.  Gastric Cancer. 2000;  3 219-225
• 3 Tanabe S, Koizumi W, Mitomi H. et al . Clinical outcome of endoscopic aspiration mucosectomy for early gastric cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  56 708-713
• 4 Oda I, Saito D, Tada M. et al . A multicenter retrospective study of endoscopic resection for early gastric cancer.  Gastric Cancer. 2006;  9 262-270
• 5 Minami S, Gotoda T, Ono H. et al . Complete endoscopic closure of gastric perforation induced by endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer using endoclips can prevent surgery (with video).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 602-605
• 6 Watanabe K, Ogata S, Kawazoe S. et al . Clinical outcomes of EMR for gastric tumors: historical pilot evaluation between endoscopic submucosal dissection and conventional mucosal resection.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  63 776-782
• 7 Oka S, Tanaka S, Kaneko I. et al . Advantage of endoscopic submucosal dissection compared with EMR for early gastric cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2006;  64 877-883
• 8 Takeuchi Y, Uedo N, Iishi H. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection with insulated-tip knife for large mucosal early gastric cancer: a feasibility study (with videos).  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  66 186-193
• 9 Yamamoto S, Uedo N, Ishihara R. et al . Endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer performed by supervised residents: assessment of feasibility and learning curve.  Endoscopy. 2009;  41 923-928
• 10 Strauss R J, Friedman M, Platt N. et al . Gangrene of the stomach: a case of acute necrotizing gastritis.  Am J Surg. 1978;  135 253-257
• 11 Stadaas J, Aune S, Haffner J F. Effects of proximal gastric vagotomy on intragastric pressure and adaptation in pigs.  Scand J Gastroenterol. 1974;  9 479-485
• 12 Saul S H, Dekker A, Watson C G. Acute gastric dilatation with infarction and perforation. Report of fatal outcome in patient with anorexia nervosa.  Gut. 1981;  22 978-983
• 13 Uccheddu A, Floris G, Altana M L. et al . Surgery for perforated peptic ulcer in the elderly. Evaluation of factors influencing prognosis.  Hepatogastroenterology. 2003;  50 1956-1958