Placing Brain Injury Rehabilitation in the Context of the Self and Meaningful Engagement

ABSTRACT

Since his publications began to appear in the mid 1980s, Mark Ylvisaker has shaped the way clinicians worldwide approach brain injury rehabilitation. His body of work reflects his exceptional ability to draw together theories, ideas, and practices from multiple disciplines and paradigms culminating in the development of a clinically powerful framework to facilitate change in behavior. The focus of this article is two core aspects of Mark Ylvisaker's work that have had a significant impact on my own work. These aspects involve (1) using conceptualization of self or identity construction as a guide for developing rehabilitation goals and (2) centralizing meaningful activity within the intervention process. In a small way, this article is a tribute to an exceptional man who was dedicated to improving the lives of people with brain injury and in doing so succeeded in improving the lives of all who had the privilege of knowing him and knowing his work.

KEYWORDS

Brain injury - rehabilitation - self-concept - activity - participation

REFERENCES

• 1 Douglas J M, Spellacy F J. Correlates of depression in adults with severe traumatic brain injury and their carers.  Brain Inj. 2000;  14(1) 71-88
• 2 Ylvisaker M. Context-sensitive cognitive rehabilitation after brain injury: theory and practice.  Brain Impair. 2003;  4 1-16
• 3 Ylvisaker M. Self coaching: a context-sensitive, person-centred approach to social communication after traumatic brain injury.  Brain Impair. 2006;  7 246-258
• 4 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Collaborative Brain Injury Intervention: Positive Everyday Routines. New York, NY; Thomson Delmar Learning 1998
• 5 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Reflections on Dobermanns, poodles and social rehabilitation for difficult-to-serve individuals with traumatic brain injury.  Aphasiology. 2000;  14 407-431
• 6 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T, Capo M. Long-term community supports for individuals with co-occurring disabilities after traumatic brain injury: cost effectiveness and project-based intervention.  Brain Impair. 2007;  8 276-292
• 7 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T, Urbanczyk B. A social-environmental approach to communication and behavior after traumatic brain injury.  Semin Speech Lang. 1993;  14 74-87
• 8 Ylvisaker M, Hanks R, Johnson-Greene D. Perspectives on rehabilitation of individuals with cognitive impairment after brain injury: rationale for reconsideration of theoretical paradigms.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2002;  17(3) 191-209
• 9 Ylvisaker M, Jacobs H E, Feeney T. Positive supports for people who experience behavioral and cognitive disability after brain injury: a review.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;  18(1) 7-32
• 10 Ylvisaker M, Turkstra L S, Coelho C. Behavioral and social interventions for individuals with traumatic brain injury: a summary of the research with clinical implications.  Semin Speech Lang. 2005;  26(4) 256-2677
• 11 Ylvisaker M, Feeney T. Reconstruction of identity after brain injury.  Brain Impair. 2000;  1 12-28
• 12 Feeney T J, Ylvisaker M, Rosen B H, Greene P. Community supports for individuals with challenging behavior after brain injury: an analysis of the New York state behavioral resource project.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2001;  16(1) 61-75
• 13 Gracey F, Palmer S, Rous B. “Feeling part of things”: personal construction of self after brain injury.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;  18(5-6) 627-650
• 14 Jumisko E, Lexell J, Söderberg S. The meaning of living with traumatic brain injury in people with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury.  J Neurosci Nurs. 2005;  37(1) 42-50
• 15 Nochi M. Dealing with the “void”: traumatic brain injury as a story.  Disabil Soc. 1997;  12 533-555
• 16 Nochi M. “Loss of self” in the narratives of people with traumatic brain injuries: a qualitative analysis.  Soc Sci Med. 1998;  46(7) 869-878
• 17 Tyerman A, Humphrey M. Changes in self-concept following severe head injury.  Int J Rehabil Res. 1984;  7(1) 11-23
• 18 Vickery C D, Gontkovsky S T, Caroselli J S. Self-concept and quality of life following acquired brain injury: a pilot investigation.  Brain Inj. 2005;  19(9) 657-665
• 19 Wright J C, Telford R. Psychological problems following minor head injury: a prospective study.  Br J Clin Psychol. 1996;  35(Pt 3) 399-412
• 20 Ylvisaker M, McPherson K, Kayes N, Pellett E. Metaphoric identity mapping: facilitating goal setting and engagement in rehabilitation after traumatic brain injury.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008;  18(5–6) 713-741
• 21 Douglas J. Exploring the conceptualisation of self in people with severe traumatic brain injury.  Brain Impair. 2008;  9 226-227
• 22 World Health Organization (WHO) .International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health. Geneva, Switzerland; WHO 2001
• 23 Douglas J, Dyson M, Foreman P. Increasing leisure activity following severe traumatic brain injury: does it make a difference?.  Brain Impair. 2006;  7 107-118
• 24 Stewart-Scott A M, Douglas J M. Educational outcome for secondary and postsecondary students following traumatic brain injury.  Brain Inj. 1998;  12(4) 317-331
• 25 Ylvisaker M, Hartwick P, Stevens M. School reentry following head injury: managing the transition from hospital to school.  J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1991;  6 10-12
• 26 Snow P C, Douglas J M. Conceptual and methodological challenges in discourse assessment with TBI speakers: towards an understanding.  Brain Inj. 2000;  14(5) 397-415
• 27 Ylvisaker M, Holland A. Coaching, self-coaching, and rehabilitation of head injury. In: Johns DF Clinical Management of Neurogenic Communicative Disorders. Boston, MA; Little, Brown 1985: 243-257
• 28 Ylvisaker M, Szekeres S, Feeney T. Communication disorders associated with traumatic brain injury. In: Chapey R Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. New York, NY; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2001: 745-808
• 29 Snow P, Douglas J, Ponsford J. Discourse assessment following traumatic brain injury: a pilot study examining some demographic and methodological issues.  Aphasiology. 1995;  9 365-380
• 30 Bracy C, Douglas J. Marital dyad perceptions of injured partners' communication following severe traumatic brain injury.  Brain Impair. 2005;  6 1-12
• 31 Watts A, Douglas J. Interpreting facial expression and communication competence following severe traumatic brain injury.  Aphasiology. 2006;  20 707-722
• 32 Douglas J, Bracy C, Snow P. Exploring the factor structure of the La Trobe Communication Questionnaire: insights into the nature of communication deficits following traumatic brain injury.  Aphasiology. 2007;  21 1181-1194
• 33 Douglas J M. Relation of executive functioning to pragmatic outcome following severe traumatic brain injury.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2010;  53(2) 365-382
• 34 Shorland J, Douglas J M. Understanding the role of communication in maintaining and forming friendships following traumatic brain injury.  Brain Inj. 2010;  24(4) 569-580