Download PDF
Synlett 2011(9): 1235-1238  
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1259939
CLUSTER
© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart ˙ New York

Enantioselective Brønsted Acid Catalysis in the Friedel-Crafts Reaction of Indoles with Secondary ortho-Hydroxybenzylic Alcohols

David Wilcke, Eberhardt Herdtweck, Thorsten Bach*
Department Chemie and Catalysis Research Center (CRC), Technische Universität München, Lichtenbergstr. 4, 85747 Garching, Germany
Fax: +49(89)28913315; e-Mail: thorsten.bach@ch.tum.de;
Further Information

Publication History

Received 28 January 2011
Publication Date:
18 April 2011 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

The reaction of indole and various methyl-substituted indoles with the title compounds was studied in the presence of chiral phosphoric acids, which act as Brønsted acid catalysts. While yields were generally high (>90%), significant enantioselectivities (up to 77% ee) were only achieved for certain substrate-catalyst combinations. In addition, a kinetic resolution of the starting material was observed, which led to an enrichment of one chiral alcohol to up to 68% ee after 76% conversion. The Friedel-Crafts reaction is not stereospecific (no direct SN2-type substitution), but rather is likely to proceed via a cation, which is bound to the chiral Brønsted acid or its anion in a close contact ion pair.

Key words

carbocations - stereoselective synthesis - electrophilic aromatic substitutions - alkylations - enantioselectivity - organocatalysis

    Primary data for this article are available online and can be cited using the following DOI: 10.4125/pd0011th:
  • Primary Data
    • FIDs and associated files for the ¹H and ¹³C NMR spectra for compounds 3, 4, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, and 13 are summarized.

    References and Notes

  • 1 Short review: Cozzi PG. Benfatti F. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2010,  49:  256 ; Angew. Chem.  2010,  122:  264 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 2a Catalytic Asymmetric Friedel-Crafts Alkylations   Bandini M. Umani-Ronchi A. Wiley-VCH; Weinheim: 2009. 
    Google Scholar
  • 2b Rueping M. Nachtsheim BJ. Beilstein J. Org. Chem.  2010,  6:  No. 6 
    Google Scholar
  • 2c Terrasson V. Marcia de Figueiredo R. Campagne JM. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2010,  2635 
    Google Scholar
  • 2d Poulsen TB. Jørgensen KA. Chem. Rev.  2008,  108:  2903 
    Google Scholar
  • 3a Mühlthau F. Schuster O. Bach T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2005,  127:  9348 
    Google Scholar
  • 3b Mühlthau F. Bach T. Synthesis  2005,  3428 
    Google Scholar
  • 3c Stadler D. Mühlthau F. Rubenbauer P. Herdtweck E. Bach T. Synlett  2006,  2573 
    Google Scholar
  • 3d Stadler D. Bach T. Chem. Asian J.  2008,  3:  272 
    Google Scholar
  • 3e Stadler D. Bach T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2008,  47:  7557 
    Google Scholar
  • 4a Mühlthau F. Stadler D. Goeppert A. Olah GA. Prakash GKS. Bach T. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2006,  128:  9668 
    Google Scholar
  • 4b Stadler D. Goeppert A. Rasul G. Olah GA. Prakash GKS. Bach T. J. Org. Chem.  2009,  74:  312 
    Google Scholar
  • Reviews:
  • 5a Terada M. Synthesis  2010,  1929 
    Google Scholar
  • 5b You S.-L. Cai Q. Zeng M. Chem. Soc. Rev.  2009,  38:  2190 
    Google Scholar
  • 5c Terada M. Chem. Commun.  2008,  4097 
    Google Scholar
  • 5d Akiyama T. Chem. Rev.  2007,  107:  5744 
    Google Scholar
  • 5e Zamfir A. Schenker S. Freund M. Tsogoeva SB. Org. Biomol. Chem.  2010,  8:  5262 
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Uraguchi T. Terada M. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2004,  126:  5356 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Akiyama T. Itoh J. Yokota K. Fuchibe K. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2004,  43:  1566 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8a Sun F.-L. Zeng M. Gu Q. You S.-L. Chem. Eur.
    J.  2009,  15:  8709 
    Google Scholar
  • 8b Sun F.-L. Zheng X.-J. Gu Q. He Q.-L. You S.-L. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2010,  47 
    Google Scholar
  • 8c See also: Rueping M. Nachtsheim BJ. Moreth SA. Bolte M. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2008,  47:  593 
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Guo Q.-X. Peng Y.-G. Zhang J.-W. Song L. Feng Z. Gong L.-Z. Org. Lett.  2009,  11:  4620 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Liang T. Zhang Z. Antilla JC. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2010,  49:  9734 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • For recent work on ion pairs with onium and iminium ions, see:
  • 11a Čorić I. Müller S. List B. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2010,  132:  17370 
    Google Scholar
  • 11b Yu X. Lu A. Wang Y. Wu G. Song H. Zhou Z. Tang C. Eur. J. Org. Chem.  2011,  892 ; and references cited therein
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Nakashima D. Yamamoto H. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2006,  128:  9626 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Specht DP. Martic PA. Farid S. Tetrahedron  1982,  38:  1203 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Katritzky AR. Ji Y. Fang Y. Prakash I. J. Org. Chem.  2001,  66:  5613 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Baciocchi E. Bietti M. Putignani L. Steenken S. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  1996,  118:  5952 
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 16a Wu TR. Shen L. Chong JM. Org. Lett.  2004,  6:  2701 
    Google Scholar
  • 16b Jacques J. Fouquey C. Org. Synth.  1989,  67:  1 
    Google Scholar
  • 16c Storer RI. Carrera DE. Ni Y. MacMillan DWC. J. Am. Chem. Soc.  2006,  128:  84 
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Klussmann M. Ratjen L. Hoffmann S. Wakchaure V. Goddard R. List B. Synlett  2010,  2189 
    Article in Thieme ConnectGoogle Scholar
  • Relevant reviews:
  • 18a Bandini M. Melloni A. Tommasi S. Umani-Ronchi A. Synlett  2005,  1199 
    Google Scholar
  • 18b Bandini M. Eichholzer A. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2009,  48:  9608 
    Google Scholar
  • 18c Zeng M. You S.-L. Synlett  2010,  1289 
    Google Scholar
  • 18d Bartoli G. Bencivenni G. Dalpozzo R. Chem. Soc. Rev.  2010,  39:  4449 
    Google Scholar
  • 21 First example of a kinetic resolution with chiral phosphoric acids: Enders D. Narine AA. Toulgoat F. Bisschops T. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed.  2008,  47:  5661 
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
19

Representative Procedure (8)
A Schlenk flask containing 250 mg of 4 Å MS was charged with benzylic alcohol 3 (21.0 mg, 100 µmol) and indole (46.9 mg, 400 µmol) in dry trifluorotoluene (1.5 mL). Catalyst 7g (7.53 mg, 10 µmol) was added, and the resulting mixture was stirred at r.t. until the starting material was completely consumed (monitored by TLC). The crude reaction mixture was purified directly by flash column chromatography on silica gel (eluent: pentane-Et2O = 4:1 to 2:1) yielding compound 8 (30.9 mg, 100 µmol, quant., 50% ee) as a light-brown solid. ¹H NMR (360 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 1.15 (s, 9 H), 3.71 (s, 3 H), 4.51 (s, 1 H), 5.30 (s, 1 H), 6.28 (d, 4 J = 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 6.44 (dd, ³ J = 8.5 Hz, 4 J = 2.3 Hz, 1 H), 7.04 (virt. t, ³ J = ca. 7.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.15 (virt. t, ³ J = ca. 7.6 Hz, 1 H), 7.26 (d, ³ J = 8.5 Hz, 1 H), 7.29 (d, ³ J = 8.1 Hz, 1 H), 7.36 (d, ³ J = 1.9 Hz, 1 H), 7.52 (d, ³ J = 8.0 Hz, 1 H), 8.02 (br s, 1 H) ppm. ¹³C NMR (90.6 MHz, CDCl3): δ = 28.9, 35.8, 45.4, 55.1, 101.6, 105.8, 110.8, 117.3, 119.4, 119.5, 121.2, 121.5, 122.2, 128.7, 132.1, 135.5, 154.9, 158.6 ppm. HRMS: m/z calcd for C20H23NO2: 309.1723; found: 309.1724.

20

An analysis of the absolute structure based on Bayesian statistics and Friedel pairs with a coverage of 99% resulted in a probability of 1.00.
Crystal Data
Formula: C20H23NO2˙C4H10O; M r = 383.51; crystal color and shape: colorless fragment, crystal dimensions: 0.13 × 0.23 × 0.69 mm; crystal system: monoclinic; space group: P21 (no. 4); a = 10.2950 (4), b = 7.7382 (3), c = 15.1602 (5) Å, β = 104.737 (2)˚; V = 1168.00(8) ų; Z = 2; µ MoK α = 0.071 mm-¹; ρ calcd = 1.090 g cm-³; θ range = 1.39-25.33˚; data collected: 27134; independent data [I o > 2σ (I o)/all data/R int]: 3857/4255/0.027; data/restraints/parameters: 4255/1/267; R1 [I o > 2σ (I o)/all data]: 0.0376/0.0419; wR2
[I o > 2σ (I o)/all data]: 0.1086/0.1119; GOF = 1.089; Δρ max/min: 0.11/-0.13 e Å-³; Flack parameter; x = -0.6 (13); ‘Flack Equivalent’ Hooft parameter y = -0.3 (3). For detailed information see Supporting Information. CCDC 808871
[(-)-8] contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this compound. This data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.

22

Crystal Data
Formula: C12H18O3; M r = 210.26; crystal color and shape: colorless fragment, crystal dimensions: 0.46 × 0.51 × 0.61 mm; crystal system: orthorhombic; space group: P212121 (no. 19); a = 6.6950 (1), b = 9.1455 (2), c = 19.2531 (4) Å; V = 1178.85 (4) ų; Z = 4; µ CuK α = 0.680 mm-¹; ρ calcd = 1.185 g cm-³; θ range = 4.59-66.30˚; data collected: 27197; independent data [I o > 2σ (I o)/all data/R int]: 1984/1995/0.027; data/restraints/parameters: 1995/0/209; R1 [I o > 2σ (I o)/all data]: 0.0215/0.0216; wR2 [I o > 2σ (I o)/all data]: 0.0582/0.0582; GOF = 1.111; Δρ max/min: 0.13/-0.12 e Å-³; Flack parameter; x = 0.03 (15); ‘Flack Equivalent’ Hooft parameter y = 0.05 (3). For detailed information see Supporting Information. CCDC 808870 [(+)-3)] contains the supplementary crystallographic data for this compound. This data can be obtained free of charge from The Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre via www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/data_request/cif.