Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1261931
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York
A 9-Year Single Center Experience with Circumumbilical Ramstedt's Pyloromyotomy
Publication History
received March 3, 2010
accepted after revision May 15, 2010
Publication Date:
27 July 2010 (online)

Abstract
Introduction: Pyloric stenosis is a common cause of vomiting in infancy and is usually treated with a Ramstedt's pyloromyotomy. In this study we retrospectively reviewed our experience with the circumumbilical incision for the treatment of pyloric stenosis with a particular emphasis on the relation between postoperative emesis and postoperative time to feeds.
Material and Method: The medical records of all patients undergoing pyloromyotomy for IHPS from January 2000 to December 2008 were reviewed retrospectively. Patient details were recorded and statistically analyzed using SPSS version 13. We reviewed our experience looking specifically at the postoperative time to initial feeds as a way of minimizing hospital stay.
Results: 513 patients’ notes were available for the study. There were 440 males and 73 females (M:F ratio 6:1). Median age at operation was 40 days (2–194 days) and a positive family history was obtained in 11.9%. Median duration of symptoms was 10 days (range 1–60 days). There were 31 (6%) complications related to surgery. The average number of postoperative emesis episodes was 1.9. The median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days (1–60). The average time to feeding was 20 h (1–69).
Conclusion: This is a large single-center retrospective study where, in the era of minimally invasive surgery, Ramstedt's pyloromyotomy via the circumumbilical approach has a low rate of complications and is a safe and feasible method to treat pyloric stenosis. The establishment of feeds soon after surgery minimizes the postoperative in-hospital stay.
Key words
pyloric stenosis - pyloromyotomy - circumumbilical
References
- 1
Ramstedt C.
Zur Operation der angeborenen Pylorus-Stenose.
Med Klin.
1912;
8
1702-1705
MissingFormLabel
- 2
Spicer RD.
Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: A review.
Br J Surg.
1982;
69
128-135
MissingFormLabel
- 3 O’Neill JA. Principles of Pediatric Surgery. 2nd edn. Mosby: St. Louis 2004
MissingFormLabel
- 4
To T, Wajja A, Wales PW. et al .
Population demographic indicators associated with incidence of pyloric stenosis.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med.
2005;
159
520-525
MissingFormLabel
- 5
Tan KC, Bianchi A.
Circumumbilical incision for pyloromyotomy.
Br J Surg.
1986;
73
399
MissingFormLabel
- 6
Alain JL, Grousseau D, Terrier G.
Extramucosal pylorotomy by laparoscopy.
J Pediatr Surg.
1991;
26
1191-1192
MissingFormLabel
- 7
Leahy A, Fitzgerald RJ.
The influence of delayed feeding on postoperative vomiting in hypertrophic pyloric
stenosis.
Br J Surg.
1982;
69
658-659
MissingFormLabel
- 8
Scharli AF, Leditschke JF.
Gastric motility after pyloromyotomy in infants. A reappraisal of postoperative feeding.
Surgery.
1968;
64
1133-1137
MissingFormLabel
- 9
Wheeler RA, Najmaldin AS, Stoodley N. et al .
Feeding regimens after pyloromyotomy.
Br J Surg.
1990;
77
1018-1019
MissingFormLabel
- 10
Puapong D, Kahng D, Ko A. et al .
Ad libitum feeding: Safely improving the cost-effectiveness of pyloromyotomy.
J Pediatr Surg.
2002;
37
1667-1668
MissingFormLabel
- 11
Carpenter RO, Schaffer RL, Maeso CE. et al .
Postoperative ad lib feeding for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.
J Pediatr Surg.
1999;
34
959-961
MissingFormLabel
- 12
Gollin G, Doslouglu H, Flummerfeldt P. et al .
Rapid advancement of feedings after pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis.
Clin Pediatr (Phila).
2000;
39
187-190
MissingFormLabel
- 13
Mullassery D, Perry D, Goyal A. et al .
Surgical practice for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in the United Kingdom
and Ireland – a survey of members of the British Association of Paediatric Surgeons.
J Pediatr Surg.
2008;
43
1227-1229
MissingFormLabel
- 14
Aspelund G, Langer JC.
Current management of hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.
Semin Pediatr Surg.
2007;
16
27-33
MissingFormLabel
- 15
St Peter SD, Holcomb 3rd GW, Calkins CM. et al .
Open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: A prospective, randomized
trial.
Ann Surg.
2006;
244
363-370
MissingFormLabel
- 16
Leclair MD, Plattner V, Mirallie E. et al .
Laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: A prospective, randomized
controlled trial.
J Pediatr Surg.
2007;
42
692-698
MissingFormLabel
- 17
Hall NJ, Pacilli M, Eaton S. et al .
Recovery after open versus laparoscopic pyloromyotomy for pyloric stenosis: A double-blind
multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Lancet.
2009;
373
390-398
MissingFormLabel
- 18
Maher M, Hehir DJ, Horgan A. et al .
Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis: Long-term audit from a general surgical unit.
Ir J Med Sci.
1996;
165
115-117
MissingFormLabel
- 19
Kiely PD, Tierney S, Barry M. et al .
Infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis in a regional centre.
Ir J Med Sci.
2000;
169
100-102
MissingFormLabel
- 20
Huddart SN, Bianchi A, Kumar V. et al .
Ramstedt's pyloromyotomy: Circumumbilical versus transverse approach.
Pediatr Surg Int.
1993;
8
395-396
MissingFormLabel
- 21
Leinwand MJ, Shaul DB, Anderson KD.
The umbilical fold approach to pyloromyotomy: Is it a safe alternative to the right
upper-quadrant approach?.
J Am Coll Surg.
1999;
189
362-367
MissingFormLabel
- 22
Kim SS, Lau ST, Lee SL. et al .
Pyloromyotomy: A comparison of laparoscopic, circumumbilical, and right upper quadrant
operative techniques.
J Am Coll Surg.
2005;
201
66-70
MissingFormLabel
- 23
Blumer RM, Hessel NS, van Baren R. et al .
Comparison between umbilical and transverse right upper abdominal incision for pyloromyotomy.
J Pediatr Surg.
2004;
39
1091-1093
MissingFormLabel
- 24
Yagmurlu A, Barnhart DC, Vernon A. et al .
Comparison of the incidence of complications in open and laparoscopic pyloromyotomy:
A concurrent single institution series.
J Pediatr Surg.
2004;
39
292-296
; discussion 292-296
MissingFormLabel
- 25
Fujimoto T, Lane GJ, Segawa O. et al .
Laparoscopic extramucosal pyloromyotomy versus open pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic
pyloric stenosis: Which is better?.
J Pediatr Surg.
1999;
34
370-372
MissingFormLabel
- 26
Hall NJ, Van Der Zee J, Tan HL. et al .
Meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open pyloromyotomy.
Ann Surg.
2004;
240
774-778
MissingFormLabel
- 27
Hulka F, Harrison MW, Campbell TJ. et al .
Complications of pyloromyotomy for infantile hypertrophic pyloric stenosis.
Am J Surg.
1997;
173
450-452
MissingFormLabel
- 28
Shankar KR, Losty PD, Jones MO. et al .
Umbilical pyloromyotomy – an alternative to laparoscopy?.
Eur J Pediatr Surg.
2001;
11
8-11
MissingFormLabel
- 29
Cozzi DA, Ceccanti S, Mele E. et al .
Circumumbilical pyloromyotomy in the era of minimally invasive surgery.
J Pediatr Surg.
2008;
43
1802-1806
MissingFormLabel
- 30
Ceccanti S, Mele E, Cozzi DA.
The perceived cosmetic value of laparoscopic pyloromyotomy.
J Pediatr Surg.
2008;
43
1579-1580
; author's reply 1580–1571
MissingFormLabel
Correspondence
Dr. Yousef El-GoharyMB Bch BAO, MRCS(Glasg)
Our Lady's Children's Hospital
Paediatric Surgery
Crumlin 12
Dublin
Ireland
Phone: +35 314 096 100
Fax: +35 314 096 216
Email: gohary77@yahoo.com