Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2010; 26(4): 320-327
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1262314
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Objective Measures in Aesthetic and Functional Nasal Surgery: Perspectives on Nasal Form and Function

Sachin S. Pawar1 , Guilherme J.M Garcia2 , Julia S. Kimbell3 , John S. Rhee1
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
  • 2Department of Pharmacology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
  • 3Department of Otolaryngology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
27 July 2010 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

The outcomes of aesthetic and functional nasal surgery are difficult to assess objectively because of the intricate balance between nasal form and function. Despite historical emphasis on patient-reported subjective measures, objective measures are gaining importance in both research and the current outcomes-driven health care environment. Objective measures currently available have several shortcomings that limit their routine clinical use. In particular, the low correlation between objective and subjective measures poses a major challenge. However, advances in computer, imaging, and bioengineering technology are now setting the stage for the development of innovative objective assessment tools for nasal surgery that can potentially address some of the current limitations. Assessment of nasal form after aesthetic surgery is evolving from two-dimensional analysis to more sophisticated three-dimensional analysis. Similarly, assessment of nasal function is evolving with the introduction of computational fluid dynamics techniques, which allow for a detailed description of the biophysics of nasal airflow. In this article, we present an overview of objective measures in both aesthetic and functional nasal surgery and discuss future trends and applications that have the potential to change the way we assess nasal form and function.

KEYWORDS

Nasal surgery - outcomes - modeling - computational fluid dynamics - nasal valve - rhinoplasty - septoplasty - septorhinoplasty

REFERENCES

  • 1 Rhee J S. Measuring outcomes in nasal surgery: realities and possibilities.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2009;  11 416-419
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Most S P, Alsarraf R, Larrabee Jr W F. Outcomes of facial cosmetic procedures.  Facial Plast Surg. 2002;  18 119-124
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Lund V J. Objective assessment of nasal obstruction.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1989;  22 279-290
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Rhee J S, McMullin B T. Outcome measures in facial plastic surgery: patient-reported and clinical efficacy measures.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;  10 194-207
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Allanson J E. Objective techniques for craniofacial assessment: what are the choices?.  Am J Med Genet. 1997;  70 1-5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Werther J R, Freeman J P. Changes in nasal tip projection and rotation after septorhinoplasty: a cephalometric analysis.  J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1998;  56 728-732; discussion 733
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Petroff M A, McCollough E G, Hom D, Anderson J R. Nasal tip projection. Quantitative changes following rhinoplasty.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1991;  117 783-788
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Byrd H S, Hobar P C. Rhinoplasty: a practical guide for surgical planning.  Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;  91 642-654; discussion 655–656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Ingels K, Orhan K S. Measurement of preoperative and postoperative nasal tip projection and rotation.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006;  8 411-415
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Spörri S, Simmen D, Briner H R, Jones N. Objective assessment of tip projection and the nasolabial angle in rhinoplasty.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;  6 295-298; discussion 299–300
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Park H S, Rhee S C, Kang S R, Lee J H. Harmonized profiloplasty using balanced angular profile analysis.  Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2004;  28 89-97
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chatrath P, De Cordova J, Nouraei S AR, Ahmed J, Saleh H A. Objective assessment of facial asymmetry in rhinoplasty patients.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2007;  9 184-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Daudia A, Alkhaddour U, Sithole J, Mortimore S. A prospective objective study of the cosmetic sequelae of nasal septal surgery.  Acta Otolaryngol. 2006;  126 1201-1205
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kortbus M J, Ham J, Fechner F, Constantinides M. Quantitative analysis of lateral osteotomies in rhinoplasty.  Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2006;  8 369-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Da Silveira A C, Daw Jr J L, Kusnoto B, Evans C, Cohen M. Craniofacial applications of three-dimensional laser surface scanning.  J Craniofac Surg. 2003;  14 449-456
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Honrado C P, Larrabee Jr W F. Update in three-dimensional imaging in facial plastic surgery.  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;  12 327-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Beard L F, Burke P H. Evolution of a system of stereophotogrammetry for the study of facial morphology.  Med Biol Illus. 1967;  17 20-25
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Burke P H, Hughes-Lawson C A. Stereophotogrammetric study of growth and development of the nose.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1989;  96 144-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 van Heerbeek N, Ingels K J, van Loon B, Plooij J M, Bergé S J. Three dimensional measurement of rhinoplasty results.  Rhinology. 2009;  47 121-125
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Chau H, Dasgupta R, Sauret V, Kenyon G. Use of an optical surface scanner in assessment of outcome following rhinoplasty surgery.  J Laryngol Otol. 2008;  122 972-977
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Hilberg O, Jackson A C, Swift D L, Pedersen O F. Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of nasal cavity geometry by acoustic reflection.  J Appl Physiol. 1989;  66 295-303
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Clement P AR, Gordts F. Standardisation Committee on Objective Assessment of the Nasal Airway, IRS, and ERS . Consensus report on acoustic rhinometry and rhinomanometry.  Rhinology. 2005;  43 169-179
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Cole P. Nasal airflow resistance: a survey of 2500 assessments.  Am J Rhinol. 1997;  11 415-420
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ricci E, Palonta F, Preti G et al.. Role of nasal valve in the surgically corrected nasal respiratory obstruction: evaluation through rhinomanometry.  Am J Rhinol. 2001;  15 307-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Singh A, Patel N, Kenyon G, Donaldson G. Is there objective evidence that septal surgery improves nasal airflow?.  J Laryngol Otol. 2006;  120 916-920
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Chandra R K, Patadia M O, Raviv J. Diagnosis of nasal airway obstruction.  Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009;  42 207-225, vii
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Corey J P. Acoustic rhinometry: should we be using it?.  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;  14 29-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Corey J P, Gungor A, Nelson R, Liu X, Fredberg J. Normative standards for nasal cross-sectional areas by race as measured by acoustic rhinometry.  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;  119 389-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Grymer L F. Reduction rhinoplasty and nasal patency: change in the cross-sectional area of the nose evaluated by acoustic rhinometry.  Laryngoscope. 1995;  105(4 Pt 1) 429-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Vidyasagar R, Friedman M, Ibrahim H, Bliznikas D, Joseph N J. Inspiratory and fixed nasal valve collapse: clinical and rhinometric assessment.  Am J Rhinol. 2005;  19 370-374
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lang C, Grützenmacher S, Mlynski B, Plontke S, Mlynski G. Investigating the nasal cycle using endoscopy, rhinoresistometry, and acoustic rhinometry.  Laryngoscope. 2003;  113 284-289
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Terheyden H, Maune S, Mertens J, Hilberg O. Acoustic rhinometry: validation by three-dimensionally reconstructed computer tomographic scans.  J Appl Physiol. 2000;  89 1013-1021
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Cakmak O, Celik H, Ergin T, Sennaroglu L. Accuracy of acoustic rhinometry measurements.  Laryngoscope. 2001;  111(4 Pt 1) 587-594
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Bermüller C, Kirsche H, Rettinger G, Riechelmann H. Diagnostic accuracy of peak nasal inspiratory flow and rhinomanometry in functional rhinosurgery.  Laryngoscope. 2008;  118 605-610
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Starling-Schwanz R, Peake H L, Salome C M et al.. Repeatability of peak nasal inspiratory flow measurements and utility for assessing the severity of rhinitis.  Allergy. 2005;  60 795-800
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Hanif J, Eccles R, Jawad S S. Use of a portable spirometer for studies on the nasal cycle.  Am J Rhinol. 2001;  15 303-306
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hanif J, Jawad S SM, Eccles R. A study to assess the usefulness of a portable spirometer to quantify the severity of nasal septal deviation.  Rhinology. 2003;  41 11-15
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Seren E. Frequency spectra of normal expiratory nasal sound.  Am J Rhinol. 2005;  19 257-261
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Kjaergaard T, Cvancarova M, Steinsvåg S K. Relation of nasal air flow to nasal cavity dimensions.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;  135 565-570
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Batchelor G K. An Introduction to Fluid Dynamics. Cambridge, UK; Cambridge University Press 1967
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Keyhani K, Scherer P W, Mozell M M. Numerical simulation of airflow in the human nasal cavity.  J Biomech Eng. 1995;  117 429-441
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Subramaniam R P. Computational fluid dynamics simulations of inspiratory airflow in the human nose and nasopharynx.  Inhal Toxicol. 1998;  10 91-120
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Sung S J, Jeong S J, Yu Y S, Hwang C J, Pae E K. Customized three-dimensional computational fluid dynamics simulation of the upper airway of obstructive sleep apnea.  Angle Orthod. 2006;  76 791-799
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Garcia G J, Bailie N, Martins D A, Kimbell J S. Atrophic rhinitis: a CFD study of air conditioning in the nasal cavity.  J Appl Physiol. 2007;  103 1082-1092
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Hood C M, Schroter R C, Doorly D J, Blenke E JSM, Tolley N S. Computational modeling of flow and gas exchange in models of the human maxillary sinus.  J Appl Physiol. 2009;  107 1195-1203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Xiong G X, Zhan J M, Jiang H Y et al.. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of airflow in the normal nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses.  Am J Rhinol. 2008;  22 477-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Chen X B, Lee H P, Chong V FH, Wang Y. Assessment of septal deviation effects on nasal air flow: a computational fluid dynamics model.  Laryngoscope. 2009;  119 1730-1736
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Lee H P, Poh H J, Chong F H, Wang Y. Changes of airflow pattern in inferior turbinate hypertrophy: a computational fluid dynamics model.  Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;  23 153-158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Ozlugedik S, Nakiboglu G, Sert C et al.. Numerical study of the aerodynamic effects of septoplasty and partial lateral turbinectomy.  Laryngoscope. 2008;  118 330-334
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Lindemann J, Brambs H J, Keck T, Wiesmiller K M, Rettinger G, Pless D. Numerical simulation of intranasal airflow after radical sinus surgery.  Am J Otolaryngol. 2005;  26 175-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Xiong G, Zhan J, Zuo K, Li J, Rong L, Xu G. Numerical flow simulation in the post-endoscopic sinus surgery nasal cavity.  Med Biol Eng Comput. 2008;  46 1161-1167
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Zhao K, Pribitkin E A, Cowart B J, Rosen D, Scherer P W, Dalton P. Numerical modeling of nasal obstruction and endoscopic surgical intervention: outcome to airflow and olfaction.  Am J Rhinol. 2006;  20 308-316
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Segal R A, Kepler G M, Kimbell J S. Effects of differences in nasal anatomy on airflow distribution: a comparison of four individuals at rest.  Ann Biomed Eng. 2008;  36 1870-1882
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Liu Y, Johnson M R, Matida E A, Kherani S, Marsan J. Creation of a standardized geometry of the human nasal cavity.  J Appl Physiol. 2009;  106 784-795
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Elad D, Naftali S, Rosenfeld M, Wolf M. Physical stresses at the air-wall interface of the human nasal cavity during breathing.  J Appl Physiol. 2006;  100 1003-1010
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Bailie N, Hanna B, Watterson J, Gallagher G. A model of airflow in the nasal cavities: implications for nasal air conditioning and epistaxis.  Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2009;  23 244-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Garcia G J, Rhee J S, Senior B A, Kimbell J S. Septal deviation and nasal resistance: an investigation using virtual surgery and computational fluid dynamics.  Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2010;  24 e46-e53
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Cole P, Chaban R, Naito K, Oprysk D. The obstructive nasal septum. Effect of simulated deviations on nasal airflow resistance.  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;  114 410-412
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Dinis P B, Haider H. Septoplasty: long-term evaluation of results.  Am J Otolaryngol. 2002;  23 85-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar

John S RheeM.D. M.P.H. 

Department of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences

Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 West Wisconsin Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53226

Email: jrhee@mcw.edu

      >