Transcranial Contralateral Routing of the Signal as a Fitting Option for Patients with Single-Sided Deafness

ABSTRACT

Patients with single-sided deafness (SSD) often report difficulty recognizing speech when the signal is on the side of the poorer ear. As discussed in this issue of Seminars in Hearing, several fitting options are available for patients with SSD. One option that could take on greater interest due to advancements in multichannel feedback management, noise reduction, and directional microphones is the transcranial contralateral routing of the signal (TCROS). This article reviews previous reports on performance with the TCROS. This article also focuses on the advances in hearing aid technology and how these advances could improve TCROS as a fitting option for patients with SSD. Finally, this article provides information on factors that audiologists should take into consideration for patient and hearing aid selection for TCROS and outlines a procedure to verify performance of TCROS using the real-ear-aided response (REAR) and other real-ear measures (REM).

KEYWORDS

Single-sided deafness - transcranial contralateral routing of the signal - unilateral hearing loss - transcranial threshold

REFERENCES

• 1 Sullivan R. Transcranial ITE CROS.  Hear Instrum. 1988;  39(1) 1111-1112
• 2 McSpaden J, McSpaden C. A method for evaluating the efficacy and effectiveness of transcranial CROS fittings.  Audecibel. 1989;  38 10-14
• 3 Miller A J. An alternative approach to CROS and Bi-CROS hearing aids: an internal CROS.  Audecibel. 1989;  38 20-21
• 4 McSpaden J. One approach to a unilateral “dead” ear.  Audecibel. 1990;  39 32-34
• 5 Chartrand M. Transcranial or internal CROS fittings: evaluation and validation protocol.  Hear J. 1991;  44 24-28
• 6 Valente M, Valente M, Potts L, Vass W, Goebel J. Wireless CROS versus transcranial CROS hearing aids.  Am J Audiol. 1995;  4 52-58
• 7 Bauman N, Braemer M. Using a CIC hearing aid in transcranial CROS fittings.  Hear J. 1996;  49(3) 27-28 45-46
• 8 Hayes D E, Chen J M. Bone-conduction amplification with completely-in-the-canal hearing aids.  J Am Acad Audiol. 1998;  9(1) 59-66
• 9 Fagelson M A, Noe C M, Murnane O D, Blevins J S. Predicted gain and functional gain with transcranial routing of signal completely-in-the-canal hearing aids.  Am J Audiol. 2003;  12(2) 84-90
• 10 Hol M, Kunst S, Snik A, Cremers C. Pilot study on the effectiveness of the conventional CROS, the transcranial CROS and the BAHA transcranial CROS in adults with unilateral inner ear deafness.  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;  267(6) 889-896
• 11 Valente M, Valente M, Mispagel K. Fitting options for patients with single sided deafness. Audiol Online. Available at: http://www.audiologyonline.com Accessed November 20, 2009
• 12 Valente M. Fitting options for adults with SSD.  Hear J. 2007;  60(8) 10-18
• 13 Roeser R, Clark J. Clinical Masking. In: Roeser R, Valente M, Hosford-Dunn H Audiology Diagnosis. New York, NY; Thieme Medical Publishers 2007: 261-287
• 14 American National Standards Institute (S3.6–1989) .Specification for audiometers. New York, NY; Acoustical Society of America 1989
• 15 Keller J. Loudness discomfort levels: A retrospective study comparing data from Pascoe (1988) and Washington University School of Medicine. Capstone Project in partial fulfillment of the Doctorate of Audiology in the Program of Audiology and Communication Sciences at Washington University School of Medicine 2006
• 16 Valente M, Potts L G, Valente M. Differences and intersubject variability of loudness discomfort levels measured in sound pressure level and hearing level for TDH-50P and ER-3A earphones.  J Am Acad Audiol. 1997;  8(1) 59-67
• 17 Byrne D, Dillon H, Ching T, Katsch R, Keidser G. NAL-NL1 procedure for fitting nonlinear hearing aids: characteristics and comparisons with other procedures.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2001;  12(1) 37-51