Download PDF
Semin Hear 2010; 31(4): 393-409
DOI: 10.1055/s-0030-1268037
© Thieme Medical Publishers

SoundBite Hearing System by Sonitus Medical: A New Approach to Single-Sided Deafness

Gerald R. Popelka1
  • 1Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
08 December 2010 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

A new approach (SoundBite Hearing System) for single-sided deafness (SSD) has been developed (Sonitus Medical, San Mateo, CA). It consists of one component that resembles a conventional behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aid that wirelessly connects to a second component worn in-the-mouth (ITM) that resembles a conventional dental appliance. The BTE component positions a microphone in the ear canal on the poorer-hearing side to capture the spatial hearing acoustic qualities of a normal ear canal and pinna. The ITM component delivers bone conduction signals via the surfaces of the teeth with an embedded transducer that delivers signals to 12,000 Hz, a much broader frequency bandwidth than existing SSD devices. The signal is transferred to the better-hearing ear via direct bone conduction, but without the need for surgery. An ITM hearing device is safe, comfortable, generally invisible, and easy to insert and remove. The two components use full digital processing with all the advanced functions of contemporary digital hearing aids. Measures of the Hearing in Noise Test on SSD patients (n = 18) indicated a substantial and immediate 2 dB advantage compared to the unaided condition. These results warrant a full multisite clinical trial that is underway and will be completed in 2010.

KEYWORDS

Single-sided deafness - bone conduction - teeth - high frequency

REFERENCES

  • 1 Van Wanrooij M M, Van Opstal A J. Contribution of head shadow and pinna cues to chronic monaural sound localization.  J Neurosci. 2004;  24(17) 4163-4171
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Andersen H T, Schrøder S A, Bonding P. Unilateral deafness after acoustic neuroma surgery: subjective hearing handicap and the effect of the bone-anchored hearing aid.  Otol Neurotol. 2006;  27(6) 809-814
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Noble W, Gatehouse S. Interaural asymmetry of hearing loss, Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ) disabilities, and handicap.  Int J Audiol. 2004;  43(2) 100-114
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bishop C E, Eby T L. The current status of audiologic rehabilitation for profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.  Laryngoscope. 2010;  120(3) 552-556
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Lin L M, Bowditch S, Anderson M J, May B, Cox K M, Niparko J K. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.  Otol Neurotol. 2006;  27(2) 172-182
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Niparko J K, Cox K M, Lustig L R. Comparison of the bone anchored hearing aid implantable hearing device with contralateral routing of offside signal amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness.  Otol Neurotol. 2003;  24(1) 73-78
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Verstraeten N, Zarowski A J, Somers T, Riff D, Offeciers E F. Comparison of the audiologic results obtained with the bone-anchored hearing aid attached to the headband, the testband, and to the “snap” abutment.  Otol Neurotol. 2009;  30(1) 70-75
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Linstrom C J, Silverman C A, Yu G P. Efficacy of the bone-anchored hearing aid for single-sided deafness.  Laryngoscope. 2009;  119(4) 713-720
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Wazen J J, Young D L, Farrugia M C et al.. Successes and complications of the Baha system.  Otol Neurotol. 2008;  29(8) 1115-1119
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 House J W, Kutz Jr J W. Bone-anchored hearing aids: incidence and management of postoperative complications.  Otol Neurotol. 2007;  28(2) 213-217
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Newman C W, Sandridge S A, Wodzisz L M. Longitudinal benefit from and satisfaction with the Baha system for patients with acquired unilateral sensorineural hearing loss.  Otol Neurotol. 2008;  29(8) 1123-1131
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Burkey J M, Berenholz L P, Lippy W H. Lippy Group . Latent demand for the bone-anchored hearing aid: the Lippy Group experience.  Otol Neurotol. 2006;  27(5) 648-652
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Badran K, Bunstone D, Arya A K, Suryanarayanan R, Mackinnon N. Patient satisfaction with the bone-anchored hearing aid: a 14-year experience.  Otol Neurotol. 2006;  27(5) 659-666
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Bosman A J, Snik F M, Mylanus E A, Cremers W R. Fitting range of the BAHA Intenso.  Int J Audiol. 2009;  48(6) 346-352
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Moore B C, Stone M A, Füllgrabe C, Glasberg B R, Puria S. Spectro-temporal characteristics of speech at high frequencies, and the potential for restoration of audibility to people with mild-to-moderate hearing loss.  Ear Hear. 2008;  29(6) 907-922
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Best V, Carlile S, Jin C, van Schaik A. The role of high frequencies in speech localization.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;  118(1) 353-363
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Horwitz A R, Ahlstrom J B, Dubno J R. Factors affecting the benefits of high-frequency amplification.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;  51(3) 798-813
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Popelka G R, Telukuntla G, Puria S. Middle-ear function at high frequencies quantified with advanced bone-conduction measures.  Hear Res. 2010;  263(1–2) 85-92
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Lenhardt M L, Richards D G, Madsen A G, Goldstein B A, Shulman A, Guinta R. Measurement of bone conduction levels for high frequencies.  Int Tinnitus J. 2002;  8(1) 9-12
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Hodgetts W E, Scollie S D, Swain R. Effects of applied contact force and volume control setting on output force levels of the BAHA Softband.  Int J Audiol. 2006;  45(5) 301-308
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Popelka G R, Derebery J, Blevins N H et al.. Preliminary evaluation of a novel bone-conduction device for single-sided deafness.  Otol Neurotol. 2010;  31(3) 492-497
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Dahlin G C, Allen F G, Collard E W. Bone-conduction thresholds of human teeth.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1973;  53(5) 1434-1437
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Specification for Audiometers. American National Standards Institute 2004 S3.6
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 24 Stenfelt S, Håkansson B. Air versus bone conduction: an equal loudness investigation.  Hear Res. 2002;  167(1–2) 1-12
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Wilson R H, McArdle R A, Smith S L. An evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN materials on listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;  50(4) 844-856
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 MacDonald J A, Henry P P, Letowski T R. Spatial audio through a bone conduction interface.  Int J Audiol. 2006;  45(10) 595-599
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Wazen J J, Gupta R, Ghossaini S, Spitzer J, Farrugia M, Tjellstrom A. Osseointegration timing for Baha system loading.  Laryngoscope. 2007;  117(5) 794-796
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Ho E C, Monksfield P, Egan E, Reid A, Proops D. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aid: impact on quality of life measured with the Glasgow Benefit Inventory.  Otol Neurotol. 2009;  30(7) 891-896
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Stenfelt S. Bilateral fitting of BAHAs and BAHA fitted in unilateral deaf persons: acoustical aspects.  Int J Audiol. 2005;  44(3) 178-189
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Priwin C, Stenfelt S, Granström G, Tjellström A, Håkansson B. Bilateral bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHAs): an audiometric evaluation.  Laryngoscope. 2004;  114(1) 77-84
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar

Gerald R PopelkaPh.D. 

Professor of Otolaryngology and Chief of Audiology, Department of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery, Stanford University

801 Welch Road, Stanford, CA 94305

Email: gpopelka@stanford.edu