Abstract
It has been reported that performance in cycling time-trials is enhanced when power is varied in response to gradient although such a mechanical pacing strategy has never been confirmed experimentally in the field. The aim of this study was, therefore, to assess the efficacy of mechanical pacing by comparing a constant power strategy of 255 W with a variable power strategy that averaged to 255 W over an undulating time-trial course. 20 experienced cyclists completed 4 trials over a 4 km course with 2 trials at an average constant power of 253 W and 2 trials where power was varied in response to gradient and averaged 260 W. Time normalised to 255 W was 411±31.1 s for the constant power output trials and 399±29.5 s for the variable power output trials. The variable power output strategy therefore reduced completion time by 12±8 s (2.9%) which was significant (p<0.001). Participants experienced difficulty in applying a constant power strategy over an undulating course which acted to reduce their time gain. It is concluded that a variable power strategy can improve cycling performance in a field time-trial where the gradient is not constant.
Key words
pacing - modeling - time-trial - cycling
References
-
1
Atkinson G, Brunskill A.
Pacing strategies during a cycling time trial with simulated headwinds and tailwinds.
Ergonomics.
2000;
43
1449-1460
-
2
Atkinson G, Davison R, Jeukendrup A, Passfield L.
Science and cycling: current knowledge and future directions for research.
J Sports Sci.
2003;
21
767-787
-
3
Atkinson G, Peacock O, Passfield L.
Variable versus constant power strategies during cycling time-trials: prediction of time savings using an up-to-date mathematical model.
J Sports Sci.
2007;
25
1001-1009
-
4
Atkinson G, Peacock O, Law M.
Acceptability of power variation during a simulated hilly time trial.
Int J Sports Med.
2007;
28
157-163
-
5
Bertucci W, Duc S, Villerius V, Pernin JN, Grappe F.
Validity and reliability of the PowerTap mobile cycling powermeter when compared with the SRM Device.
Int J Sports Med.
2005;
26
868-873
-
6
Chaffin ME, Berg K, Zuniga J, Hanumanthu VS.
Pacing pattern in a 30-minute maximal cycling test.
J Strength Cond Res.
2008;
22
2011-2017
-
7
Gordon S.
Optimising distribution of power during a cycling time trial.
Sports Eng.
2005;
8
81-90
-
8
Harriss DJ, Atkinson G.
International Journal of Sports Medicine – Ethical Standards in Sport and Exercise Science Research.
Int J Sports Med.
2009;
30
701-702
-
9 Landau S, Everitt B. A Handbook of Statistical Analysis Using SPSS. London: Chapman & Hall; 2004
-
10
Lander PJ, Butterley RJ, Edwards AM.
Self-paced exercise is less physically challenging than enforced constant pace exercise of the same intensity: influence of complex central metabolic control.
Br J Sports Med.
2009;
43
789-795
-
11
Liedl MA, Swain DP, Branch JD.
Physiological effects of constant versus variable power during endurance cycling.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
1999;
31
1472-1477
-
12
Martin JC, Milliken DL, Cobb JE, McFadden KL, Coggan AR.
Validation of a mathematical model for road cycling power.
J Appl Biomech.
1998;
14
276-291
-
13
Palmer GS, Noakes TD, Hawley JA.
Effects of steady-state versus stochastic exercise on subsequent cycling performance.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
1997;
29
684-687
-
14
Paton CD, Hopkins WG.
Ergometer error and biological variation in power output in a performance test with three cycle ergometers.
Int J Sports Med.
2006;
27
444-447
-
15
Swain DP.
A model for optimizing cycling performance by varying power on hills and in wind.
Med Sci Sports Exerc.
1997;
29
1104-1108
-
16
UK National 10 Time Trial Results
.
Available at
http://www.rttc.org.uk
[Accessed 21st December 2009]
Correspondence
Patrick Cangley
University of Brighton
Chelsea School
Hillbrow
BN20 7SR Eastbourne
United Kingdom
Telefon: + 44/1372/273 163
Fax: + 44/1372/273 163
eMail: p.cangley@brighton.ac.uk