Int J Sports Med 2011; 32(5): 353-356
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1271772
Training & Testing

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Reliability/Validity of the Fortius Trainer

J. J. Peiffer1 , B. Losco1
  • 1School of Chiropractic and Sports Science, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Australia
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

accepted after revision January 19, 2011

Publikationsdatum:
04. März 2011 (online)

Preview

Abstract

This study examined the reliability/validity of power output measured using the Fortius Virtual Reality cycle trainer. 10 cyclists (age: 28±6 years; V˙O2max: 60.9±7.2 ml · kg−1 · min−1; peak power: 393±82 W) completed three 20 km time trials on a Fortius cycle trainer. During each time trial, power output was measured at 1 Hz using the Fortius internal software and a PowerTap power monitor. Validity calculated for the Fortius trainer; Pearson correlation coefficient (r=0.99; 95% CI: 0.98–0.99; p<0.01) and typical error of estimate (3.5%; 95% CI: 3.2–3.9%), was similar to other established laboratory ergometers. No differences (F2,16=0.32; p=0.73) in mean 20 km power were observed between trial 1 (253±46 W), 2 (258±49 W), or 3 (255±50 W). Test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV)) was better between trial 2 and 3 (ICC=1.00 (CI: 0.98–1.00); CV: 1.6% (CI: 1.1–3.3%)) compared with trial 1 and 2 (ICC=0.98 (CI: 0.91–1.00); CV: 3.3% (CI: 2.2–6.4%)). The Fortius cycle trainer is a valid and reliable device for the measurement of power output in cyclists, thus providing an alternative to larger more expensive laboratory ergometers.

References

Correspondence

Dr. Jeremiah PeifferPhD 

Murdoch University

School of Chiropractic and

Sports Science

90 South Street

6150 Murdoch

Australia

Telefon: + 61/08/9360 7603

Fax: + 61/08/9360 7579

eMail: j.peiffer@murdoch.edu.au