Risikokalkulation bei häuslicher Gewalt

Zusammenfassung

Die Arbeit verfolgt das Ziel, einen systematischen Überblick über Risk-Assessment-Instrumente zu geben, die eine Beurteilung des Wiederholungsrisikos häuslicher Gewalt erlauben. Es konnten sechs Instrumente identifiziert werden, die erstens in einer wissenschaftlichen Zeitschrift mit Peer-Review-Verfahren publiziert wurden und zweitens empirisch validiert wurden: das Domestic Violent Screening Instrument (DVSI), das Danger Assessment (DA), das Spousal Assault Risk-Assessment (SARA) und die aktuarischen Instrumente, wie das Ontario Domestic Assault Risk-Assessment (ODARA), der Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) und der Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (DVRAG). Diese Instrumente werden im Hinblick auf ihre Validität und Aspekte der praktischen Anwendung diskutiert.

Abstract

The aim of the present study is to give a systematic overview of risk assessment instruments for the field of domestic violence. Six instruments were identified, which had been published in a peer-reviewed journal and for which validation studies exist: the Domestic Violent Screening Instrument (DVSI), the Danger Assessment (DA), the Spousal Assault Risk-Assessment (SARA), the Ontario Domestic Assault Risk-Assessment (ODARA), the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG), and the Domestic Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (DVRAG). Their validity and practical use are discussed.

Schlüsselwörter

Häusliche Gewalt - Gewalt gegen Partner - Risk-Assessment-Instrumente - Risikobeurteilung

Keywords

domestic violence - intimate partner violence - risk assessment instruments - risk evaluation

Literatur

• 1 Boetticher A, Kröber H -L, Müller-Isberner R et al. Mindestanforderungen für Prognosegutachten.  Forensische Psychiatrie, Psychologie, Kriminologie. 2007;  1 90-100
• 2 Campbell J C. Prediction of homicide of and by battered women. In: Assessing dangerousness: Violence by sexual offenders, batterers, and child abusers.. Thousand Oaks, CA US: Sage Publications, Inc; 1995: 96-113
• 3 Kropp P R, Hart S D, Webster C D. et al .Assessing risk of violence in wife assaulters: The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide. In: Impulsivity: Theory, assessment, and treatment.. New York, NY US: Guilford Press; 1997: 302-325
• 4 Williams K R, Houghton A B. Assessing the Risk of Domestic Violence Reoffending: A Validation Study.  Law and Human Behavior. 2004;  28 437-455
• 5 Hilton N Z, Harris G T, Rice M E et al. A Brief Actuarial Assessment for the Prediction of Wife Assault Recidivism: The Ontario Domestic Assault Risk Assessment.  Psychological Assessment. 2004;  16 267-275
• 6 Hilton N Z, Harris G T, Rice M E et al. An indepth actuarial assessment for wife assault recidivism: The Domestic violence risk appraisal guide.  Law and Human Behavior. 2008;  32 150-163
• 7 Quinsey V L, Harris G T, Rice M E. et al .Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk. Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association; 1998
• 8 Rossegger A, Urbaniok F, Danielsson C et al. Der Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) – ein Instrument zur Kriminalprognose bei Gewaltstraftätern. Übersichtsarbeit und autorisierte deutsche Übersetzung.  Fortschritte der Neurologie und Psychiatrie. 2009;  77 577-584
• 9 Kroner C, Stadtland C, Eidt M et al. The validity of the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) in predicting criminal recidivism.  Crim Behav Ment Health. 2007;  17 89-100
• 10 Endrass J, Rossegger A, Frischknecht A et al. Using the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG) to predict in-prison aggressive behavior in a Swiss offender population.  Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2008;  52 81-89
• 11 Urbaniok F, Noll T, Grunewald S et al. Prediction of violent and sexual offences: A replication study of the VRAG in Switzerland.  The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology. 2006;  17 23-31
• 12 Dutton D G, Kropp P R. A review of domestic violence risk instruments.  Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. 2000;  1 171-181
• 13 Roehl J, Guertin K. Intimate Partner Violence: The Current Use of Risk Assessments in Sentencing Offenders.  The Justice System Journal. 2000;  21 171-198
• 14 Urbaniok F, Endrass J, Rossegger A et al. The prediction of criminal recidivism: the implication of sampling in prognostic models.  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2007;  257 129-134
• 15 Hilton N Z, Harris G T. Assessing risk of intimate partner violence. In: Campbell J C, ed Assessing dangerousness: violence by batterers and child abusers.. 2nd ed. New York: Springer; 2007: 105-125
• 16 Urbaniok F, Rinne T, Held L et al. Forensische Risikokalkulationen: Grundlegende methodische Aspekte zur Beurteilung der Anwendbarkeit und Validität verschiedener Verfahren.  Fortschritte der Neurologie und Psychiatrie. 2008;  76 470-477
• 17 Kropp P R, Baldry A C, Winkel F W. Development of the Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA) and the Brief Spousal Assault Form for the Evaluation of Risk (B-SAFER). In: Intimate partner violence prevention and intervention: The risk assessment and management approach.. Hauppauge, NY US: Nova Science Publishers; 2008: 19-31
• 18 Hare R D. Manual for the Hare Psychopathy Checklist – Revised. Toronto, Ontario: Multi-Health Systems; 1991
• 19 Harris G T, Rice M E, Quinsey V L. Psychopathy as a taxon: evidence that psychopaths are a discrete class.  Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology. 1994;  62 387-397
• 20 Ægisdóttir S, White M J, Spengler P M et al. The Meta-Analysis of Clinical Judgment Project: Fifty-Six Years of Accumulated Research on Clinical Versus Statistical Prediction.  The Counseling Psychologist. 2006;  34 341-382
• 21 Grann M, Wedin I. Risk factors for recidivism among spousal assault and spousal homicide offenders.  Psychology, Crime & Law. 2002;  8 5-23
• 22 König A. Der Nutzen standardisierter Risikoprognoseinstrumente für Einzelfallentscheidungen in der forensischen Praxis.  Recht und Psychiatrie. 2010;  28 67-73
• 23 Rossegger A, Laubacher A, Moskvitin K et al. Risk Assessment Instruments in Repeat Offending: The Usefulness of FOTRES.  Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol. 2010 Feb. 11 [Epub ahead of print]
• 24 Straus M A. Measuring intrafamily conflict and violence: The Conflict Tactics (CT) Scales.  Journal of Marriage and Family. 1979;  41 75-88
• 25 Hudson W W, McIntosh S R. The assessment of spouse abuse: two quantifiable dimensions.  Journal of Marriage and the Family. 1981;  43 873-886
• 26 Hart S D, Cox D N, Hare R D. The Hare Psychopathy Checklist: Screening Version Toronto. Multi-Health Systems; 1995
• 27 Nuffield N. Parole decision-making in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Communication Division; 1982
• 28 Weisz A N, Tolman R M, Saunders D G. Assessing the risk of severe domestic violence: The importance of survivors’ predictions.  Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2000;  15 75-90
• 29 Goodman L A, Dutton M A, Bennett L. Predicting repeat abuse among arrested batterers: Use of the Danger Assessment Scale in the criminal justice system.  Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2000;  15 63-74
• 30 Heckert D A, Gondolf E W. Battered women’s perceptions of risk versus risk factors and instruments in predicting repeat reassault.  Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2004;  19 778-800
• 31 Kropp P R, Hart S D, Webster C D. et al .Spousal Assault Risk Assessment Guide (SARA). Toronto: Multi-Health System Inc; 1999
• 32 Kropp P R, Hart S D. The Spousal Assault Risk Assessment (SARA) Guide: Reliability and validity in adult male offenders.  Law and Human Behavior. 2000;  24 101-118
• 33 Hilton N Z, Harris G T, Rice M E. Risk assessment for domestically violent men: Tools for criminal justice, offender intervention, and victim services. Washington, DC US: American Psychological Association; 2010
• 34 Hilton N Z, Harris G T, Rice M E. Predicting violence by serious wife assaulters.  Journal of Interpersonal Violence. 2001;  16 408-423
• 35 Rossegger A, Urbaniok F, Danielsson C et al. Violence Risk Appraisal Guide (VRAG). Autorisierte deutsche Übersetzung Zürich; 2009
• 36 Harris G T, Rice M E, Quinsey V L. Violent Recidivism of Mentally Disordered Offenders: The Development of a Statistical Prediction Instrument.  Criminal Justice and Behavior. 1993;  20 315-335
• 37 Dutton D G. The domestic assault of women. Vancouver: UBC Press; 1995
• 38 Dutton D G, Bodnarchuk M, Kropp R et al. Client personality disorders affecting wife assault post-treatment recidivism.  Violence and Victims. 1997;  12 37-50
• 39 3 Jahre Zürcher Gewaltschutzgesetz. Zürich: Interventionstelle gegen Häusliche Gewalt der Direktion der Justiz und des Innern des Kantons Zürich; 2010 http://www.ist.zh.ch/content/internet/ji/ist/de/home.html