Failure to Report Ethical Approval and Informed Consent in Paediatric Surgical Publications

Abstract

Introduction: Medical research involving human subjects must follow ethical standards as outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki of the World Medical Association. The 3 journals J Ped Surg, Eur J Pediatr Surg and Pediatr Surg Int all require authors' statements regarding ethical approval and the patient or guardian informed consent for studies involving human subjects. It has previously been reported that ethical approval and informed consent is not documented in a considerable proportion of publications in other journals. The aim of this study was to investigate whether ethical approval and informed consent was documented in a consecutive series of publications involving human subjects in the 3 paediatric surgical journals.

Material and Methods: All articles involving human subjects or material published in the print and online issues of J Ped Surg, Eur J Pediatr Surg and Pediatr Surg Int in 2010 were systematically reviewed as to whether ethics committee or institutional review board approval and patient or guardian consent to participate in the study was reported. Publications were categorised into prospective studies, retrospective studies, description of new methods and case reports.

Results: 579 articles were included in the study (324 J Ped Surg, 103 Eur J Pediatr Surg and 153 Pediatr Surg Int). In case reports (n=142), the lowest level of documentation of ethical approval (1.4%) and informed consent (1%) was observed. The remaining 437 original articles reported ethical approval in 54% of publications (prospective studies 66%, retrospective studies 59%, new methods 27%). Informed consent was documented in 16% of the original articles (prospective studies 50%, retrospective studies 17%, new methods 14%). Detailed investigation of the different journals revealed the highest rate of reporting of ethical approval for J Pediatr Surg (71%), followed by Eur J Pediatr Surg (43%), and Pediatr Surg Int (24%). Patient or guardian informed consent was reported in 15% of the publications in J Pediatr Surg and Pediatr Surg Int, respectively, and in 24% of the papers published in Eur J Pediatr Surg.

Conclusion: Adherence to ethical principles in paediatric surgical research should be improved. Information on ethical approval and informed consent should be included in all manuscripts accepted for publication. Editors should consider establishing a specific online template asking authors for the necessary information during the submission process.

publication ethics - paediatric surgical research - institutional review board approval - ethics committee - informed consent

References

• 1 World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki – Ethical Principles for Medical Research involving Human Subjects [online publication] Revised October 2008;  http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/ [accessed 2nd March 2011]
• 2 International Committee of Medical Journal Editors . Requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication.  [online publication] Updated April 2010. http://www.icmje.org/ethical_6protection.html [accessed 2nd March 2011]
• 3 World Association of Medical Editors . Publication Ethics Policies for Medical Journals 2011. [online publication] http://www.wame.org/resources/publication-ethics-policies-for-medical-journals#study [accessed 2nd March 2011]
• 4 Schroter S, Plowman R, Hutchings A. et al . Reporting ethics committee approval and patient consent by study design in five general medical journals.  J Med Ethics. 2006;  32 (12) 718-723
• 5 Bauchner H, Sharfstein J. Failure to report ethical approval in child health research: review of published papers.  BMJ. 2001;  323 (7308) 318-319
• 6 Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2011 . [online publication] http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/623148/authorinstructions [accessed 2nd March 2011]
• 7 Pediatric Surgery International 2011 . [online publication] http://www.springer.com/medicine/pediatrics/journal/383 [accessed 2nd March 2011]
• 8 European Journal of Pediatric Surgery 2011 . [online publication] http://www.thieme.de/SID-844A7F60-B123B238/local_pdf/fz/ej2010_Aut.pdf [accessed 2nd March 2011]
• 9 Finlay KA, Fernandez CV. Failure to report and provide commentary on research ethics board approval and informed consent in medical journals.  J Med Ethics. 2008;  34 (10) 761-764
• 10 Yank V, Rennie D. Reporting of informed consent and ethics committee approval in clinical trials.  JAMA. 2002;  287 (21) 2835-2838
• 11 Weil E, Nelson RM, Ross LF. Are research ethics standards satisfied in pediatric journal publications?.  Pediatrics. 2002;  110 (2 Pt 1) 364-370
• 12 Institute of Medicine .Human Subjects Protection and Health Services Research in Federal Regulations.. Protecting Data Privacy in Health Services Research Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2000: 40-50 ISBN-10: 0-309-07187-9
• 13 Neff MJ. Institutional review board consideration of chart reviews, case reports, and observational studies.  Respir Care. 2008;  53 (10) 1350-1353
• 14 Panda M, Heath GW, Desbiens NA. et al . Research status of case reports for medical school institutional review boards.  JAMA. 2007;  298 (11) 1277-1278

Correspondence