Risk Factors for Perineal Tears in Normal Vaginal Births

Abstract

Aim: This research was planned as a prospective, descriptive study for the purpose of determining risk factors for the development of perineal tears in women having vaginal birth. Methods: A total of 537 women were monitored during childbirth in the study. The obstetric conditions that were observed during the second and third stage of labor and episiotomy repair were recorded on the diagnosis form. After delivery perineal tears were classified as first, second, third or fourth degree. These tears were also evaluated according to whether they were present together with episiotomy. Results: Correlations to an advanced degree were found in this study between perineal tears and parity, use of fundal pressure, length of labor, episiotomy time, and use of oxytocin and dolantin (pethidin) as well as between cervical tears and use of fundal pressure. In the logistic regression analysis it was determined that fundal pressure and length of second stage of labor were risk factors for the development of perineal tears. Conclusion: Interventions for shortening the second stage of labor, particularly the use of fundal pressure cause perineal and cervical tears. Therefore, interventions in the management of second stage should be decided and used very carefully.

Zusammenfassung

Einleitung: Prospektive Studie zur Ermittlung von Faktoren welche das Risiko eines Dammrisses bei Spontangeburt erhöhen. Patientinnen und Methode: In der Studie wurden 537 Frauen während und nach einer Spontangeburt beobachtet. Die geburtshilflichen Parameter während der Eröffnungs-, Austreibungs- und postpartalen Periode wurden aufgezeichnet und analysiert. Die Dammrisse wurden in 4 Grade eingeteilt. Ergebnisse: In der Studie konnte ein Zusammenhang zwischen dem Grad der Dammrisse mit der Parität der Patientin, einem möglichen Kristeller-Manöver, der Wehendauer, dem Zeitpunkt einer Episiotomie und dem Einsatz von Oxytocin bzw. Pethidin gezeigt werden. Des Weiteren zeigte sich ein Zusammenhang von Zervixrissen mit einem durchgeführten Kristeller-Manöver. In der logistischen Regressionsanalyse konnte die positive Korrelation zwischen der Länge der Austreibungsperiode und einem Kristeller-Manöver mit der Entwicklung von Dammrissen bestätigt werden. Schlussfolgerung: Insbesondere Maßnahmen zur Verkürzung der Austreibungsperiode wie beispielsweise das Kristeller-Manöver haben einen Einfluss auf die Entstehung von Dammrissen und sollten deshalb vorsichtig eingesetzt werden.

perineal tear - second stage of labor - vaginal delivery - episiotomy - fundal pressure

Dammriss - 2. Abschnitt der Gebärphase - vaginale Entbindung - Episiotomie - Fundaldruck

References

• 1 Shorten A, Donsante J, Shorten B. Birth position, accoucheur, and perineal outcomes: informing women about choices for vaginal birth.  Birth. 2002;  29 18-27
• 2 Macleod M, Strachan B, Bahl R et al.. A prospective cohort study of maternal and neonatal morbidity in relation to use of episiotomy at operative vaginal delivery.  BJOG. 2008;  115 1688-1694
• 3 Bodner-Adler B, Bodner K, Kaider A et al.. Risk factors for third-degree perineal tears in vaginal delivery, with an analysis of episiotomy types.  J Reprod Med. 2001;  46 752-756
• 4 Angioli R, Donsante J, Shorten M. Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: The University of Miami experience.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000;  182 1083-1085
• 5 Moller Bek K, Laurberg S. Intervention during labor: risk factors associated with complete tear of the anal sphincter.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1992;  71 520-524
• 6 Low L K, Seng J S, Murtland T L et al.. Clinician-specific episiotomy rates: impact on perineal outcomes.  J Midwifery Women Health. 2000;  45 87-93
• 7 Berghella V, Baxter J K, Chauhan S P. Evidence-based labor and delivery management.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;  199 445-454
• 8 Power D, Fitzpatrick M, O'Herlihy C. Obstetric anal sphincter injury: how to avoid, how to repair: a literature review.  J Fam Pract. 2006;  55 193-200
• 9 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists .Methods and Materials used in perineal Repair. Guideline No. 23. London: RCOG Press; 2004
• 10 Christianson L M, Bovbjerg V E, McDavitt E C et al.. Risk factors for perineal injury during delivery.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;  189 255-260
• 11 Leeuw J W, Struijk P C, Vierhout M E et al.. Risk factors for third degree perineal ruptures during delivery.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001;  108 383-387
• 12 Hudelist G, Gelle'n J, Singer C, Ruecklinger E, Czerwenka K, Kandolf O, Keckstein J. Factors predicting severe perineal trauma during childbirth: role of forceps delivery routinely combined with mediolateral episiotomy.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  192 875-881
• 13 Simpson K R, Knox G E. Fundal pressure during the second stage of labor.  MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2001;  26 64-70
• 14 Tukur J, Omale A O, Abdullahi H et al.. Uterine prolapse following fundal pressure in the first stage of labour: a case report.  Ann Afr Med. 2007;  6 194-196
• 15 Cosner K R. Use of fundal pressure during second-stage labor. A pilot study.  J Nurse Midwifery. 1996;  41 334-337
• 16 Matsuo K, Shiki Y, Yamasaki M et al.. Use of uterine fundal pressure maneuver at vaginal delivery and risk of severe perineal laceration.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009;  280 781-786
• 17 Hoogsteder P H, Pijnenborg J M. Use of uterine fundal pressure maneuver at vaginal delivery and risk of severe perineal laceration.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;  281 579-580
• 18 Api O, Balcin M E, Ugurel V et al.. The effect of uterine fundal pressure on the duration of the second stage of labor: a randomized controlled trial.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009;  88 320-324
• 19 Borgatta L, Piening S L, Cohen W R. Association of episiotomy and delivery position with deep perineal laceration during.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;  160 294-297
• 20 Kudish B, Sokol R J, Kruger M. Trends in major modifiable risk factors for severe perineal trauma,1996–2006.  Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008;  102 165-170
• 21 Hornemann A, Kamischke A, Luedders D W et al.. Advanced age is a risk factor for higher grade perineal lacerations during delivery in nulliparous women.  Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010;  281 59-64
• 22 Paterson C M, Sounders N G, Eadsworth J. The characteristics of the second stage of labour in 25069 singleton deliveries in the North West Thames Health Region, 1988.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1991;  165 377-380
• 23 Kadar N, Cruddas M, Campbell S. Estimating the probability of spontaneous delivery conditional on time spent in the second stage.  Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1986;  93 568-576
• 24 Janni W, Schiessl B, Peschers U et al.. The prognostic impact of a prolonged second stage of labor on maternal and fetal outcome.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2002;  81 214-221
• 25 Larsoon P G, Platz-Christensen J J, Bergman B et al.. Advantage or disadvantage of episiotomy compared with spontaneous perineal laceration.  Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1991;  31 213-216
• 26 Gould D. Perineal tears and episiotomy.  Nurs Stand. 2007;  21 41-46
• 27 Martin S, Labrecque M, Marcoux S et al.. The association between perineal trauma and spontaneous perineal tears.  Journal of Family Practice. 2001;  50 333-337
• 28 Payne T N, Carey J C, Rayburn W F. Prior third- or fourth-degree perineal tears and recurrence risks.  Int J Gynecol Obstet. 1999;  64 55-57
• 29 Wilcox L S, Strobino D M, Baruffi G et al.. Episiotomy and its role in the incidence of perineal lacerations in a maternity center and a tertiary hospital abstetric service.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989;  160 1047-1052
• 30 Klein M C, Gauthier R J, Robbins J M et al.. Relationship of episiotomy to perineal trauma and morbidity, sexual dysfunction, and pelvic floor relaxation.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1994;  171 591-598