Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2012; 229(5): 548-553
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1281862
Klinische Studie
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Ciclosporin A 0,05 % Augentropfen zur Therapie der Keratokonjunktivitis sicca

Topical Cyclosporine A 0.05 % in the Treatment of Keratoconjunctivitis Sicca
C. Schrell
,
C. Cursiefen
,
F. Kruse
,
C. Jacobi
Further Information

Publication History

24 October 2010

27 October 2011

Publication Date:
21 December 2011 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Eine Entzündung der Augenoberfläche wird in der Pathogenese der Keratokonjunktivitis sicca zunehmend als Schlüsselmechanismus angesehen. Ziel dieser Studie war die Evaluation der topischen Therapie mit Ciclosporin A 0,05 % AT.

Patienten und Methoden: In diese klinische Studie wurden 62 Patienten mit mittelschwerer bis schwerer Keratokonjunktivitis sicca (Schweregrad 3 nach DEWS-Kriterien) eingeschlossen. Alle Patienten erhielten über einen Zeitraum von 3 Monaten eine Lokaltherapie mit hyaluronsäurehaltigen Augentropfen 5 × /Tag und 31 Patienten wurden zusätzlich mit Ciclosporin A 0,05 % AT 2 × /Tag topisch behandelt. Ausgewertet wurden lidkantenparallele Konjunktivalfalten (LIPCOF), Tränenfilmaufreißzeit (Break-up-time BUT), Vitalfärbungen (Fluoreszein-, Bengalrosafärbung), Tränenbasissekretionstest (Jones-Test), Tensio und als subjektiver Parameter der Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI-Score).

Ergebnisse: BUT, Jones-Test und OSDI-Score verbesserten sich gegenüber den Ausgangswerten nach 3 Monaten signifikant in der Ciclosporin A-Gruppe im Gegensatz zur Kontrollgruppe. Auch im Gruppenvergleich zeigte die Ciclosporin A-Gruppe nach 3 Monaten signifikant höhere Werte in BUT und Jones-Test im Vergleich zur Kontrollgruppe. In den Vitalfärbungen ergab sich nur in der Ciclosporin A-Gruppe eine tendenzielle Verbesserung der Werte nach 3 Monaten.

Schlussfolgerung: Die Therapie des trockenen Auges kann durch antiinflammatorische Medikamente, wie Ciclosporin A mit dem kausalen Therapieansatz verbessert werden. Subjektive und objektive Parameter weisen im Verlauf eine deutliche Besserung bei gutem Sicherheitsprofil des Medikamentes auf. Da derzeit auf dem europäischen Markt ein entsprechendes Ciclosporin A-Fertigpräparat nicht verfügbar ist, sollen diese Untersuchungen einen Beitrag zur Verbesserung des Bekanntheitsgrades dieser antiinflammatorischen Therapieoption bei therapierefraktärer Keratokonjunktivitis sicca leisten.

Abstract

Background: The current understanding of the pathogenesis of dry eye disease has proceeded to recognition of inflammation as the key pathogenetic mechanism. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of cyclosporine 0.05 % eye drops on subjective symptoms and objective signs of patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca.

Patients and Methods: In this clinical trial 62 patients with severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca (DEWS grade 3) were included. Over a time period of 3 months all patients received treatment with preservative-free hyaluronic acid artificial tears at one drop 5 times per day and in addition 31 patients received one drop of cyclosporine 0.05 % twice daily. Screening parameters were LIPCOF, tear break-up time (BUT), fluorescein and rose bengal staining, the intraocular pressure (IOP) and the OSDI score.

Results: In the cyclosporine A group BUT, Jones test and OSDI score improved significantly after 3 months in contrast to the controls. Moreover the values of BUT and Jones test in the cyclosporine A group were significantly higher after 3 months compared to the healthy controls. Fluorescein and rose bengal staining improved only in the cyclosporine A group after 3 months.

Conclusion: Anti-inflammatory therapy with cyclosporine A 0.05 % eye drops as off label use significantly improves subjective symptoms and objective signs in patients with severe dry eye disease providing a good safety profile. These findings suggest a widespread use of cyclosporine A 0.05 % eye drops in patients with moderate to severe keratoconjunctivitis sicca.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Jacobi C, Dietrich T, Cursiefen C et al. Das trockene Auge. Ophthalmologe 2006; 103: 9-17
  • 2 DEWS. Definition and Classification of Dry Eye. Report of the Diagnosis and Classification Subcommittee of the Dry Eye WorkShop. Ocul Surf 2007; 5: 75-139
  • 3 Luo L, Li DQ, Doshi A et al. Experimental dry eye stimulates production of inflammatory cytokines and MMP-9 and activates MAPK signalling pathways on the ocular surface. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2004; 45: 4293-4301
  • 4 Kymionis GD, Bouzoukis DI, Diakonis VF et al. Treatment of chronic dry eye: focus on cyclosporine. Clin Ophthalmol 2008; 2: 829-836
  • 5 Moss SE, Klein R, Klein BE. Prevalence of and risk factors for dry eye syndrome. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 1264-1268
  • 6 Pflugfelder SC, Tseng SC, Sanabria O et al. Evaluation of subjective assessments and objective diagnostic tests for diagnosing tear-film disorders known to cause ocular irritation. Cornea 1998; 17: 38-56
  • 7 Pflugfelder SC. Anti-inflammatory therapy for dry eye. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 137: 337-342
  • 8 Cursiefen C, Jacobi C, Dietrich T et al. Aktuelle Therapie des trockenen Auges. Ophthalmologe 2006; 103: 18-24
  • 9 Jacobi C, Bellios N, Jacobi A et al. Erhebungsbogen zur Anamnese und Diagnostik des trockenen Auges. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 14.04.2010, online Publikation
  • 10 Jacobi C, Wenkel H, Jacobi A et al. Hepatitis C and Ocular Surface Disease. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 144: 705-711
  • 11 Niederkorn JY, Stern ME, Pflugfelder SC et al. Desiccating stress induces T cell-mediated Sjogren’s syndrome-like lacrimal keratokonjunktivitis. J Immunol 2006; 176: 3950-3957
  • 12 Behrens A, Doyle JJ, Stern L et al. Dysfunctional tear syndrome. A Delphi approach to treatment recommendations. Cornea 2006; 25: 90-97
  • 13 Höh H, Schirra F, Kienecker C et al. Lidkantenparallele conjunktivale Falten sind ein sicheres diagnostisches Zeichen des trockenen Auges. Ophthalmologe 1995; 92: 802-808
  • 14 Pflugfelder SC, Maskin SL, Anderson B et al. A randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled, multicenter comparison of loteprednol etabonate ophthalmic suspension, 0,5%, and placebo for treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca in patients with delayed tear clearance. Am J Ophthalmol 2004; 138: 444-457
  • 15 Wilson SE. Inflammation: a unifying theory for the origin of dry eye syndrome. Manag Care 2003; 12: 14-19
  • 16 Stonecipher K, Perry HD, Gross RH et al. The impact of topical cyclosporine A emulsion 0.05% on the outcomes of patients with keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Curr Med Res Opin 2005; 21: 1057-1063
  • 17 Gumus K, Cavanagh DH. The role of inflammation and antiinflammation therapies in keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Clin Ophthalmol 2009; 3: 57-67
  • 18 Kunert KS, Tisdale AS, Stern ME et al. Analysis of topical cyclosporine treatment of patients with dry eye syndrome: effect on conjunctival lymphocytes. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 1489-1496
  • 19 Kunert KS, Tisdale AS, Gipson IK. Goblet cell numbers and epithelial proliferation in the conjunctiva of patients with dry eye syndrome treated with cyclosporine. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 330-337
  • 20 Perry HD, Solomon R, Donnenfeld ED et al. Evaluation of Topical Cyclosporine for the Treatment of Dry Eye Disease. Arch Ophthalmol 2008; 126: 1046-1050
  • 21 Stevenson OD, Tauber J, Reis BL. Efficacy and safety of cyclosporine A ophthalmic emulsion in the treatment of moderate to severe dry eye disease: a dose-ranging, randomized trial. The Cyclosporine A Phase 2 Study Group. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 967-974
  • 22 Toshida H, Nguyen DH, Beuerman RW et al. Neurologic Evaluation of Acute Lacrimomimetic Effect of Cyclosporine in an Experimental Rabbit Dry Eye Model. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2009; 50: 2736-2741
  • 23 Kaswan RL, Salisbury MA, Ward DA. Spontaneous canine keratoconjunctivitis sicca. A useful model for human keratoconjunctivitis sicca: treatment with cyclosporine eye drops. Arch Ophthalmol 1989; 107: 1210-1216
  • 24 Laibovitz RA, Solch S, Andrianao J. Pilot trial of cyclosporine 1% ophthalmic ointment in the treatment of keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Cornea 1993; 12: 315-323
  • 25 Perry HD, Donnenfeld ED. Dry eye diagnosis and management in 2004. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2004; 15: 299-304
  • 26 Sall K, Stevenson OD, Mundorf TK et al. Two multicenter, randomized studies of the efficacy and safety of cyclosporine ophthalmic emulsion in moderate to severe dry eye disease. Ophthalmology 2000; 107: 631-639
  • 27 Abelson M, Ousler G, Nally LA et al. Alternate reference values for tear film break-up time in normal and dry eye populations. Adv Exp Med Biol 2002; 506: 1121-1125
  • 28 Smith RE. The tear film complex: pathogenesis and emerge in therapies for dry eyes. Cornea 2005; 24: 1-7
  • 29 Stern ME, Beuerman RW, Fox RI et al. The pathology of dry eye: the interaction between the ocular surface and lacrimal glands. Cornea 1998; 17: 584-589
  • 30 Tomlinson A, Khanal S, Ramaesh K et al. Tear film osmolarity: determination of a referent value for dry eye diagnosis. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 4309-4315
  • 31 Schechter BA. Ketorolac During the Induction Phase of Cyclosporin-A Therapy. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther 2006; 22: 150-154