Am J Perinatol 2012; 29(04): 295-300
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1295636
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Hydrographic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Fetal Eye

Lisa B. Paquette
1   Division of Neonatology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
,
Hollie A. Jackson
2   Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
,
C Jane Tavaré
3   Division of Neuropathology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
,
Ashok Panigrahy
2   Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital Los Angeles, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
4   Department of Radiology, Children’s Hospital of Pittsburgh of UPMC, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
› Institutsangaben
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

16. Juni 2011

15. August 2011

Publikationsdatum:
06. Dezember 2011 (online)

Abstract

Previous work has shown that fetal hydrographic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provided additional information complementary to T2-weighted single-shot fast spin echo (ssFSE) images. The objective of this study was to determine if hydrographic MRI provides better conspicuity of fetal eye structures compared with ssFSE MRI. ssFSE and hydrographic images were retrospectively examined in 82 consecutive fetal studies with normal central nervous system without sensitivity encoding. Relative signal intensity values on ssFSE and hydrographic MRI were obtained for vitreous and sclera. Ratios of the signal intensity of vitreous to the signal intensity of sclera were calculated to determine conspicuity. Similar measurements were obtained in a smaller separate data set (n = 41) using hydrographic imaging with sensitivity encoding techniques. The hydrographic images significantly demonstrated greater conspicuity (ratio of vitreous to sclera) than ssFSE images. This was consistent for both sensitivity encoding and no-sensitivity encoding groups. The difference in conspicuity was on average approximately two times greater in the hydrographic images compared with ssFSE images. Hydrographic MRI of the fetal eye provides on average two times greater conspicuity of fetal eye structures than ssFSE imaging. This enhancement is not affected by gestational age or the use of sensitivity encoding parallel imaging techniques.

 
  • References

  • 1 Jara H, Barish MA, Yucel EK, Melhem ER, Hussain S, Ferrucci JT. MR hydrography: theory and practice of static fluid imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170: 873-882
  • 2 Kline-Fath BM, Calvo-Garcia MA, O’Hara SM, Racadio JM. Water imaging (hydrography) in the fetus: the value of a heavily T2-weighted sequence. Pediatr Radiol 2007; 37: 133-140
  • 3 Chaumoitre K, Wikberg E, Shojai R , et al. Fetal magnetic resonance hydrography: evaluation of a single-shot thick-slab RARE (rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement) sequence in fetal thoracoabdominal pathology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 27: 537-544
  • 4 Yamashita Y, Namimoto T, Abe Y , et al. MR imaging of the fetus by a HASTE sequence. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1997; 168: 513-519
  • 5 Huisman TA, Solopova A. MR fetography using heavily T2-weighted sequences: comparison of thin- and thick-slab acquisitions. Eur J Radiol 2009; 71: 557-563
  • 6 Brugger PC, Stuhr F, Lindner C, Prayer D. Methods of fetal MR: beyond T2-weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol 2006; 57: 172-181
  • 7 Chung T, Muthupillai R. Application of SENSE in clinical pediatric body MR imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 15: 197-206
  • 8 Chung T. Magnetic resonance angiography of the body in pediatric patients: experience with a contrast-enhanced time-resolved technique. Pediatr Radiol 2005; 35: 3-10
  • 9 van den Brink JS, Watanabe Y, Kuhl CK , et al. Implications of SENSE MR in routine clinical practice. Eur J Radiol 2003; 46: 3-27
  • 10 Griffiths P, Paley M, Whitby E. Imaging of the Central Nervous System of the Fetus and Neonate. New York: Taylor & Francis; 2006: 217-220
  • 11 Edward DP, Kaufman LM. Anatomy, development, and physiology of the visual system. Pediatr Clin North Am 2003; 50: 1-23
  • 12 Robinson AJ, Blaser S, Toi A , et al. MRI of the fetal eyes: morphologic and biometric assessment for abnormal development with ultrasonographic and clinicopathologic correlation. Pediatr Radiol 2008; 38: 971-981
  • 13 Chung T, Muthupillai R. Using SENSivity Encoding (SENSE) acceleration and inner volume imaging (Zoom) techniques to decrease energy deposition and increase image acquisition speed in fetal MR: work-in-progress. Pediatr Radiol 2002; 32: S50