Effects of Climbing on Core Strength and Mobility in Adults

T. Muehlbauer; M. Stuerchler; U. Granacher

doi:10.1055/s-0031-1301312

International Journal of Sports Medicine, Table of Contents

Int J Sports Med 2012; 33(06): 445-451
DOI: 10.1055/s-0031-1301312

Training & Testing

Effects of Climbing on Core Strength and Mobility in Adults

T. Muehlbauer

¹Department of Training & Movement Science, University of Potsdam, Germany

,

M. Stuerchler

²Institute of Exercise and Health Sciences, University of Basel, Switzerland

,

U. Granacher

¹Department of Training & Movement Science, University of Potsdam, Germany

› Author Affiliations

Abstract

The objective of this study was to examine the impact of an indoor climbing training and detraining program on core/handgrip strength and trunk mobility in men and women. 28 young sedentary adults participated in this study and were assigned to an intervention (30±3 years) or a control (29±2 years) group. The intervention group participated in 8 weeks (2 times/week) of indoor climbing training, followed by 8 weeks of detraining. Tests included the measurement of maximal isometric strength (MIS) of the trunk flexors/extensors, the assessment of trunk mobility in the sagittal (SAP) and the coronal (CRP) plane as well as testing of handgrip strength. After training, significant improvements were observed in MIS of the trunk flexors/extensors (~19–22%, all p<0.01), in trunk mobility in SAP/CRP (~14–19%, all p<0.01), and in handgrip strength (~5%, p<0.01). During detraining, MIS (~12–13%, all p<0.01) and trunk mobility (~7–10%, all p<0.01) deteriorated significantly, whereas handgrip strength remained. This indoor climbing training program conducted in sedentary adults proved to be feasible (i. e., attendance rate of 89.4%) and effective. It is suggested that indoor climbing should be permanently conducted to maintain the observed improvements in core muscle strength and trunk mobility.

Key words

intervention - detraining - young adults - sedentary

Full Text

References

References
1 Andersen LL, Andersen JL, Magnusson SP, Aagaard P. Neuromuscular adaptations to detraining following resistance training in previously untrained subjects. Eur J Appl Physiol 2005; 93: 511-518
2 Balas J, Strejcova B, Maly T, Mala L, Martin AJ. Changes in upper strength and body composition after 8 weeks indoor climbing in youth. Isokin Exerc Sci 2009; 17: 173-179
3 Behm DG, Drinkwater EJ, Willardson JM, Cowley PM. Canadian Society for Exercise Physiology position stand: The use of instability to train the core in athletic and nonathletic conditioning. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2010; 35: 109-112
4 Behm DG, Drinkwater EJ, Willardson JM, Cowley PM. The role of instability rehabilitative resistance training for core musculature. Strength Cond J 2011; 33: 72-81
5 Behm DG, Drinkwater EJ, Willardson JM, Cowley PM. The use of instability to train the core musculature. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab 2010; 35: 91-108
6 Blimkie CJ. Age- and sex-associated variation in strength during childhood: anthropometric, morphologic, neurologic, biomechanical, endocrinologic, genetic, and physical activity correlates. In: Gisolfi CV, Lamb DR. eds. Perspectives in Exercise Science and Sports Medicine: Youth, Exercise, and Sport. Indianapolis: Benchmark; 1989: 99-163
7 Borg GA. Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1982; 14: 377-381
8 Carter JM, Beam WC, McMahan SG, Barr ML, Brown LE. The effects of stability ball training on spinal stability in sedentary individuals. J Strength Cond Res 2006; 20: 429-435
9 Cohen J. Statistical Power for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1988
10 Coren S. The lateral preference inventory for measurement of handedness, footedness, eyedness, and earedness: Norms for young adults. Bull Psych Soc 1993; 31: 1-3
11 Cowley PM, Swensen T, Sforzo GA. Efficacy of instability resistance training. Int J Sports Med 2007; 28: 829-835
12 de Geus B, Villanueva ODriscoll S, Meeusen R. Influence of climbing style on physiological responses during indoor rock climbing on routes with the same difficulty. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006; 98: 489-496
13 Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods 2007; 39: 175-191
14 Frey I, Berg A, Grathwohl D, Keul J. Freiburg Questionnaire of physical activity – development, evaluation and application. Soz Praventivmed 1999; 44: 55-64
15 Gruber M, Gruber SB, Taube W, Schubert M, Beck SC, Gollhofer A. Differential effects of ballistic versus sensorimotor training on rate of force development and neural activation in humans. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 274-282
16 Gruber M, Taube W, Gollhofer A, Beck S, Amtage F, Schubert M. Training-specific adaptations of H- and stretch reflexes in human soleus muscle. J Mot Behav 2007; 39: 68-78
17 Guermazi M, Ghroubi S, Kassis M, Jaziri O, Keskes H, Kessomtini W, Ben Hammouda I, Elleuch MH. Validity and reliability of Spinal Mouse to assess lumbar flexion. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2006; 49: 172-177
18 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
19 Heitkamp HC, Mayer F, Böhm S. Effects of a climbing course on spine muscles in comparison to isokinetic strength training. Akt Rheumatol 1999; 24: 40-46
20 Heitkamp HC, Worner C, Horstmann T. Sport climbing with adolescents: effect on spine stabilising muscle strength. Sportverletz Sportschaden 2005; 19: 28-32
21 Imagama S, Matsuyama Y, Hasegawa Y, Sakai Y, Ito Z, Ishiguro N, Hamajima N. Back muscle strength and spinal mobility are predictors of quality of life in middle-aged and elderly males. Eur Spine J 2011; 20: 954-961
22 Lefevre J, Beunen G, Steens G, Claessens A, Renson R. Motor performance during adolescence and age thirty as related to age at peak height velocity. Ann Hum Biol 1990; 17: 423-435
23 Lemmer JT, Hurlbut DE, Martel GF, Tracy BL, Ivey FM, Metter EJ, Fozard JL, Fleg JL, Hurley BF. Age and gender responses to strength training and detraining. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2000; 32: 1505-1512
24 Mathiowetz V. Comparison of Rolyan and Jamar dynamometers for measuring grip strength. Occup Ther Int 2002; 9: 201-209
25 Mathiowetz V, Weber K, Volland G, Kashman N. Reliability and validity of grip and pinch strength evaluations. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9: 222-226
26 Melnyk JA, Rogers MA, Hurley BF. Effects of strength training and detraining on regional muscle in young and older men and women. Eur J Appl Physiol 2009; 105: 929-938
27 Ochs S, Froböse I, Trunz E, Lageström D, Wicharz J. Einsatzmöglichkeiten und Perspektiven eines neuen Screeningsystems zur Objektivierung des Funktionszustandes der Rumpfmuskulatur. Gesundheitssport Sportther 1998; 14: 144-150
28 Paalanne NP, Korpelainen R, Taimela SP, Remes J, Salakka M, Karppinen JI. Reproducibility and reference values of inclinometric balance and isometric trunk muscle strength measurements in Finnish young adults. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 1618-1626
29 Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Oberg B. Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for hand strength. J Rehabil Med 2001; 33: 36-41
30 Samson MM, Meeuwsen IB, Crowe A, Dessens JA, Duursma SA, Verhaar HJ. Relationships between physical performance measures, age, height and body weight in healthy adults. Age Ageing 2000; 29: 235-242
31 Seichert N, Baumann M, Senn E, Zuckriegl H. The “back mouse” – an analog-digital measuring device to record the sagittal outline of the back. Phys Rehab Kur Med 1994; 4: 35-43
32 Sheel AW. Physiology of sport rock climbing. Br J Sports Med 2004; 38: 355-359
33 Sherry M, Best T, Heiderscheit B. The core: where are we and where are we going?. Clin J Sport Med 2005; 15: 1-2
34 Sparkes R, Behm DG. Training adaptations associated with an 8-week instability resistance training program with recreationally active individuals. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 1931-1941
35 Testa M, Oebu B. Three dimensional analysis of variations of the forces associated with the climbing task in adolescents. Arch Physiol Biochem 1997; 105: 496-506