Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2012; 29(09): 723-730
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1314895
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Relationship between Fetal Station and Successful Vaginal Delivery in Nulliparous Women

Sally Y. Segel
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology at the Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
,
Carlos A. Carreño
2   The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
,
Steven J. Weiner
15   The George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Washington, District of Columbia
,
Steven L. Bloom
3   University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
,
Catherine Y. Spong
16   Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, Bethesda,, Maryland
,
Michael W. Varner
4   University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
,
Dwight J. Rouse
5   University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Steve N. Caritis
6   University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
,
William A. Grobman
7   Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
,
Yoram Sorokin
8   Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
,
Anthony Sciscione
9   Drexel University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
,
Brian M. Mercer
10   Case Western Reserve University–Metro Health Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
,
John M. Thorp
11   University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
,
Fergal D. Malone
12   Columbia University, New York, New York
,
Margaret Harper
13   Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
,
Jay D. Iams
14   The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
,
for the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network › Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

16 February 2012

22 February 2012

Publication Date:
29 May 2012 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective To study the relationship between fetal station and successful vaginal delivery in nulliparous women.

Study Design This was a secondary analysis from a previously reported trial of pulse oximetry. Vaginal delivery rates were evaluated and compared with respect to the fetal station. Spontaneous labor and induction of labor groups were evaluated separately. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for confounding factors.

Results Successful vaginal delivery was more frequent with an engaged vertex for spontaneous labor (86.2% versus 78.6%; p = 0.01) and induced labor (87.7% versus 66.1%; p < 0.01). After adjustment, engaged fetal vertex was not associated with vaginal delivery for spontaneous labor (odds ratio [OR] 1.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.95 to 2.3; p = 0.08) or for women with induced labor (OR 2.2; 95% CI 0.96 to 5.1; p = 0.06).

Conclusion Among nulliparous women enrolled in the FOX randomized trial in spontaneous labor or for labor induction, an engaged fetal vertex does not affect their vaginal delivery rate.

Keywords

labor - fetal station - vaginal delivery
 

  • References

  • 1 Friedman EA, Sachtleben MR. Station of the fetal presenting part. I. Pattern of descent. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965; 93: 522-529
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Friedman EA, Sachtleben MR. Station of the fetal presenting part. II. Effect on the course of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965; 93: 530-536
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Friedman EA, Sachtleben MR. Station of the fetal presenting part. 3. Interrelationship with cervical dilatation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1965; 93: 537-542
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Friedman EA, Sachtleben MR. Station of the fetal presenting part. VI. Arrest of descent in nulliparas. Obstet Gynecol 1976; 47: 129-136
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Oboro VO, Tabowei TO, Bosah JO. Fetal station at the time of labour arrest and risk of caesarean delivery. J Obstet Gynaecol 2005; 25: 20-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Roshanfekr D, Blakemore KJ, Lee J, Hueppchen NA, Witter FR. Station at onset of active labor in nulliparous patients and risk of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1999; 93: 329-331
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Falzone S, Chauhan SP, Mobley JA, Berg TG, Sherline DM, Devoe LD. Unengaged vertex in nulliparous women in active labor. A risk factor for cesarean delivery. J Reprod Med 1998; 43: 676-680
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD , et al. Births: final data for 2007. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2010; 58: 1-85
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Sutton PD , et al. Births: Final data for 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2009; 57: 1-86
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Catalano PM, Ehrenberg HM. The short- and long-term implications of maternal obesity on the mother and her offspring. BJOG 2006; 113: 1126-1133
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Smith GC, Cordeaux Y, White IR , et al. The effect of delaying childbirth on primary cesarean section rates. PLoS Med 2008; 5: e144
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Kaiser PS, Kirby RS. Obesity as a risk factor for cesarean in a low-risk population. Obstet Gynecol 2001; 97: 39-43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Crane SS, Wojtowycz MA, Dye TD, Aubry RH, Artal R. Association between pre-pregnancy obesity and the risk of cesarean delivery. Obstet Gynecol 1997; 89: 213-216
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bloom SL, Spong CY, Thom E , et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network. Fetal pulse oximetry and cesarean delivery. N Engl J Med 2006; 355: 2195-2202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lehman EL. Nonparametrics: Statistical Methods Based on Ranks. San Francisco: Holden-Day; 1975
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Peaceman AM, Lopez-Zeno JA, Minogue JP, Socol ML. Factors that influence route of delivery—active versus traditional labor management. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1993; 169: 940-944
    PubMedGoogle Scholar