Aesthetic and Functional Outcome Following Perioral Defect Reconstruction Using the Facial Artery Perforator Flap

Abstract

Background The facial artery perforator (FAP) flap was developed to facilitate reconstruction of perioral defects. Several studies reported promising results on the feasibility of using a FAP flap for this purpose, however, objective long-term outcome data are lacking. This study presents the aesthetic and functional outcome after reconstruction of perioral defects using a FAP flap.

Methods Between May 2001 and March 2009, 13 patients underwent perioral reconstruction with the use of a FAP flap. A panel consisting of five independent plastic surgeons rated the postoperative photographs based on a standardized questionnaire containing 5-point Likert scale questions and yes-or-no questions. In addition, the patients were contacted in March 2011 to give answers to a similar questionnaire over the telephone.

Results Panel as well as patient reported questionnaire results demonstrated satisfying functional and aesthetic outcome after perioral reconstruction with a FAP flap. There was a high level of agreement amongst panel members, as judged by a low inter-rater variability.

Discussion Previous studies suggested that the FAP flap is a valuable addition to facial reconstructive surgery. The results of the present study indicate that both aesthetic and functional outcomes are satisfying following perioral defect reconstruction using a FAP flap.

Keywords

facial artery perforator flap - outcome

• References

• 1 Leiter U, Garbe C. Epidemiology of melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer—the role of sunlight. Adv Exp Med Biol 2008; 624: 89-103
• 2 Moolenburgh SE, McLennan L, Levendag PC , et al. Nasal reconstruction after malignant tumor resection: an algorithm for treatment. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 97-105
• 3 Hofer SOP, Posch NAS, Smit X. The facial artery perforator flap for reconstruction of perioral defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 996-1003 , discussion 1004–1005
• 4 Demirseren ME, Afandiyev K, Ceran C. Reconstruction of the perioral and perinasal defects with facial artery perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 1616-1620
• 5 D'Arpa S, Cordova A, Pirrello R, Moschella F. Free style facial artery perforator flap for one stage reconstruction of the nasal ala. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 36-42
• 6 Hofer SOP, Mureau MAM. Local flaps. In: Neligan PC, Wei FC, eds. Microsurgical reconstruction of the head and neck. St Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 2009: 219-252
• 7 Hofer SOP, Mureau MAM. Improving outcomes in aesthetic facial reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 2009; 36: 345-354
• 8 Perisic I, Rosner B. Comparisons of measures of interclass correlations: the general case of unequal group size. Stat Med 1999; 18: 1451-1466
• 9 Donner A, Koval JJ. The estimation of intraclass correlation in the analysis of family data. Biometrics 1980; 36: 19-25
• 10 Moolenburgh SE, Mureau MAM, Hofer SOP. Aesthetic outcome after nasal reconstruction: patient versus panel perception. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2008; 61: 1459-1464
• 11 Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg 1989; 42: 645-648
• 12 Hofer SOP. Comment to “Free-style local perforator flaps: concept and classification system”. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2009; 62: 609
• 13 van Adrichem LN, Hovius SER, van Strik R, van der Meulen JC. Acute effects of cigarette smoking on microcirculation of the thumb. Br J Plast Surg 1992; 45: 9-11
• 14 van Adrichem LN, Hoegen R, Hovius SER , et al. The effect of cigarette smoking on the survival of free vascularized and pedicled epigastric flaps in the rat. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 86-96