The Emerging Role of the Direct Cutaneous Muscle Perforator Found Arising from the Muscle Vessel Hilum

Abstract

Perforator flaps based on either musculocutaneous or septocutaneous perforators are no longer a curiosity, but rather in the past decade have become “workhorse” soft tissue alternatives. Yet a keener understanding of their anatomy abetted by sophisticated imaging techniques has revealed other deep fascia perforators whose potential impact should not be overlooked. An important triad of these perforators can be found to arise ultimately from the source vessel to a muscle. This triumvirate includes the well-known, almost insignificant, capillary-like musculocutaneous perforator and the larger-caliber and often dominant musculocutaneous perforator that has become the basis of the conventional muscle perforator flap. An overlooked member of this tripartite system, though, is the direct cutaneous branch from the muscle hilum, which may be far more common than previously realized. The latter typically takes a paramuscular or extramuscular course to the skin, so that its corresponding perforator flap can be raised most simply while totally avoiding entering any muscle substance per se, and thus by definition will best ensure function preservation. Any surgeon considering a muscle perforator flap must be aware of the possibility of this tripartite system and the advantages as well as limitations of each component.

Keywords

muscle perforator flap - direct cutaneous muscle vessel perforator - musculocutaneous perforator

• References

• 1 Taylor GI, Palmer JH , The Vascular Territories. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg 1987; 40: 113-141
• 2 Hallock GG. Direct and indirect perforator flaps: the history and the controversy. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 111: 855-865 , quiz 866
• 3 Nakajima H, Fujino T, Adachi S. A new concept of vascular supply to the skin and classification of skin flaps according to their vascularization. Ann Plast Surg 1986; 16: 1-19
• 4 McGregor IA, Morgan G. Axial and random pattern flaps. Br J Plast Surg 1973; 26: 202-213
• 5 Koshima I, Narushima M, Mihara M , et al. New thoracodorsal artery perforator (TAPcp) flap with capillary perforators for reconstruction of upper limb. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2010; 63: 140-145
• 6 Wei FC, Jain V, Suominen S, Chen HC. Confusion among perforator flaps: what is a true perforator flap?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107: 874-876
• 7 Blondeel PN, Morris SF, Hallock GG, Neligan PC , Eds. Perforator Flaps: Anatomy, Technique, & Clinical Applications, Quality Medical Publishing, St. Louis, 2006
• 8 Rozen WM, Stella DL, Phillips TJ, Ashton MW, Corlett RJ, Taylor GI. Magnetic resonance angiography in the preoperative planning of DIEA perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 222e-223e
• 9 Rozen WM, Palmer KP, Suami H , et al. The DIEA branching pattern and its relationship to perforators: the importance of preoperative computed tomographic angiography for DIEA perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 367-373
• 10 Rozen WM, Phillips TJ, Ashton MW, Stella DL, Gibson RN, Taylor GI. Preoperative imaging for DIEA perforator flaps: a comparative study of computed tomographic angiography and Doppler ultrasound. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 9-16
• 11 Gravvanis A, Dionyssiou DD, Chandrasekharan L, Francis I, Smith RW. Paramuscular and paraneural perforators in DIEAP flaps: radiographic findings and clinical application. Ann Plast Surg 2009; 63: 610-615
• 12 Vasile J, Newman T, Greenspun DT , et al. Anatomic vascular imaging of perforator flaps for breast reconstruction: seeing is believing with MRA. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 71
• 13 Chen CM, Allen J. Breast reconstruction with the septocutaneous perforator flap: the next frontier. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 680
• 14 Tuinder S, Chen CM, Massey MF, Allen Sr RJ, Van der Huist R. Introducing the septocutaneous gluteal artery perforator flap: a simplified approach to microsurgical breast reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 127: 489-495
• 15 Tuinder S, Van Der Hulst R, Lataster A, Boeckx W. Superior gluteal artery perforator flap based on septal perforators: preliminary study. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 122: 146e-148e
• 16 Lester M, Allen RJ, LoTempio MM . Septocutaneous deep inferior epigastric artery flap for breast reconstruction, 25^th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Reconstructive Microsurgery, Maui, Hawaii, January 13, 2009
• 17 Massey MF, Spiegel AJ, Levine JL , et al; Group for the Advancement of Breast Reconstruction. Perforator flaps: recent experience, current trends, and future directions based on 3974 microsurgical breast reconstructions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 737-751
• 18 Woodburne RT Essentials of Human Anatomy, 4^th Edition, Oxford University Press, New York, 1969, pp.15–17
• 19 Woodburne RT Essentials of Human Anatomy, 4^th Edition, Oxford University Press, New York, 1969, p. 366
• 20 Woodburne RT Essentials of Human Anatomy, 4^th Edition, Oxford University Press, New York, 1969, pp.11
• 21 Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt KH, Monstrey SJ , et al. The “Gent” consensus on perforator flap terminology: preliminary definitions. Plast Reconstr Surg 2003; 112: 1378-1383 , quiz 1383, 1516, discussion 1384–1387
• 22 Geddes CR, Morris SF, Neligan PC. Perforator flaps: evolution, classification, and applications. Ann Plast Surg 2003; 50: 90-99
• 23 Sinna R, Boloorchi A, Mahajan AL, Qassemyar Q, Robbe M. What should define a “perforator flap”?. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010; 126: 2258-2263
• 24 Schaverien M, Saint-Cyr M, Arbique G, Brown SA. Arterial and venous anatomies of the deep inferior epigastric perforator and superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008; 121: 1909-1919
• 25 Wong C, Saint-Cyr M, Mojallal A , et al. Perforasomes of the DIEP flap: vascular anatomy of the lateral versus medial row perforators and clinical implications. Plast Reconst Surg 2010; 125: 772-782