Effects of Stroke Resistance on Rowing Economy in Club Rowers Post-Season

Abstract

In the sport of rowing, increasing the impulse applied to the oar handle during the stroke can result in greater boat velocities; this may be facilitated by increasing the surface area of the oar blade and/or increasing the length of the oars. The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of different rowing resistances on the physiological response to rowing. 5 male and 7 female club rowers completed progressive, incremental exercise tests on an air-braked rowing ergometer, using either low (LO; 100) or high (HI; 150) resistance (values are according to the adjustable “drag factor” setting on the ergometer). Expired air, blood lactate concentration, heart rate, rowing cadence, and ergometer power output were monitored during the tests. LO rowing elicited significantly greater cadences (P<0.01) and heart rates (P<0.05), whereas rowing economy (J · L O₂ equivalents^− 1) was significantly greater during HI rowing (P<0.05). These results suggest that economically, rowing with a greater resistance may be advantageous for performance. Moreover, biomechanical analysis of ergometer rowing support the notion that the impulse generated during the stroke increases positively as a function of rowing resistance. We conclude that an aerobic advantage associated with greater resistance parallels the empirical trend toward larger oar blades in competitive rowing. This may be explained by a greater stroke impulse at the higher resistance.

Key words

mechanical efficiency - economy - oxygen uptake

• References

• 1 Abbiss CR, Peiffer JJ, Laursen PB. Optimal cadence selection during cycling. Int SportMed J 2009; 10: 1-15
• 2 Baudoin A, Hawkins D. A biomechanical review of factors affecting rowing performance. Br J Sports Med 2002; 36: 396-402
• 3 Bompa TO, Haff GG. Periodization: Theory and Methodology of Training. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2009
• 4 Boyas S, Nordez A, Cornu C, Guevel A. Power responses of a rowing ergometer: mechanical sensors vs. Concept2 measurement system. Int J Sports Med 2006; 27: 830-833
• 5 Comyns TM, Harrison AJ, Hennessy L, Jensen RL. Identifying the optimal resistive load for complex training in male rugby players. Sports Biomech 2007; 6: 59-70
• 6 Cosgrove MJ, Wilson J, Watt D, Grant SF. The relationship between selected physiological variables of rowers and rowing performance as determined by a 2 000 m ergometer test. J Sports Sci 1999; 17: 845-852
• 7 di Prampero PE, Ferretti G. The energetics of anaerobic muscle metabolism: a reappraisal of older and recent concepts. Respir Physiol 1999; 118: 103-115
• 8 Ettema G, Loras HW. Efficiency in cycling: a review. Eur J Appl Physiol 2009; 106: 1-14
• 9 Hahn A, Bourdon P, Tanner R. Protocols for the physiological assessment of rowers. In: Gore C. (ed.). Physiological Tests for Elite Athletes. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2000: 317-318
• 10 Hansen EA, Jorgensen LV, Jensen K, Fregly BJ, Sjogaard G. Crank inertial load affects freely chosen pedal rate during cycling. J Biomech 2002; 35: 277-285
• 11 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
• 12 Hill H, Fahrig S. The impact of fluctuations in boat velocity during the rowing cycle on race time. Scan J Med Sci Sports 2009; 19: 585-594
• 13 Hofmijster MJ, Landman EH, Smith RM, Van Soest AJ. Effect of stroke rate on the distribution of net mechanical power in rowing. J Sports Sci 2007; 25: 403-411
• 14 Kane DA, Jensen RL, Williams SE, Watts PB. Effects of drag factor on physiological aspects of rowing. Int J Sports Med 2008; 29: 390-394
• 15 Karlson KA. Rib stress fractures in elite rowers. A case series and proposed mechanism. Am J Sports Med 1998; 26: 516-519
• 16 Lucia A, Hoyos J, Chicharro JL. Preferred pedalling cadence in professional cycling. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2001; 33: 1361-1366
• 17 Mahler DA, Hunter B, Lentine T, Ward J. Locomotor-respiratory coupling develops in novice female rowers with training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 1362-1366
• 18 Mahler DA, Shuhart CR, Brew E, Stukel TA. Ventilatory responses and entrainment of breathing during rowing. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1991; 23: 186-192
• 19 McNeely E. Training for Rowing. Ottawa: Sport Performance Institute; 2000: 59-64
• 20 Mikulic P. Anthopometric and physiological profiles of rowers of varying ages and ranks. Kinesiology 2008; 40: 80-88
• 21 Nolte V. Shorter oars are more effective. J Appl Biomech 2009; 25: 1-8
• 22 O’Neill T, Skelton A. Indoor Rowing Training Guide. Nottingham, UK: Concept2, Ltd; 2004. appendices vii–ix
• 23 Perkins C, Pivarnik J. Physiological profiles and performance predictors of a women’s NCAA rowing team. J Strength Cond Res 2003; 17: 173-176
• 24 Robergs RA, Landwehr R. The surprising history of the "HRmax=220-age" equation. J Exerc Physiol 2002; 5: 1-10
• 25 Sanderson B, Martindale W. Towards optimizing rowing technique. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1986; 18: 454-468
• 26 Sprigings E, McNair P, Mawston G, Sumner D, Boocock M. A method for personalizing the blade size for competitors in flatwater kayaking. Sports Eng 2006; 9: 147-153
• 27 Weltman A. The Blood Lactate Response to Exercise. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 1995: 34-41
• 28 Womack C, Davis S, Wood C, Sauer K, Alvarez J, Weltman A, Gaesser G. Effects of training on physiological correlates of rowing ergometry. J Strength Cond Res 1996; 10: 234-238