J Knee Surg 2012; 25(03): 207-212
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1322603
Special Focus Section
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Postoperative Management of Patients with Articular Cartilage Repair

Jennifer Yasu Stone
1   Department of Rehabilitation, Missouri Orthopedic Institute, Columbia, Missouri
,
Robert Schaal
1   Department of Rehabilitation, Missouri Orthopedic Institute, Columbia, Missouri
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

15 March 2012

20 May 2012

Publication Date:
04 August 2012 (online)

Abstract

The efficacy of the rehabilitative process following articular cartilage repair in the knee can be the factor that determines the patient's long-term success, especially for return to sport. Articular cartilage repairs show great promise in allowing patients to return to their former level of function and, when complimented with an appropriate postoperative rehabilitation program, can be highly successful in allowing return to even very high level athletics. This article seeks to overview the most recent evidence regarding the general rehabilitation process for the common types of cartilage repair, discuss common complications which may arise, and determine an athlete's readiness to return to sport. We also address postoperative pain control, evaluation of a patient's progress through rehab, and adjustments to be made when there are comorbidities present.

 
  • References

  • 1 Lewis PB, McCarty III LP, Kang RW, Cole BJ. Basic science and treatment options for articular cartilage injuries. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2006; 36 (10) 717-727
  • 2 Williams JM, Moran M, Thonar EJ, Salter RB. Continuous passive motion stimulates repair of rabbit knee articular cartilage after matrix proteoglycan loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994; 304 (304) 252-262
  • 3 Salter RB. The physiologic basis of continuous passive motion for articular cartilage healing and regeneration. Hand Clin 1994; 10 (2) 211-219
  • 4 Nho SJ, Pensak MJ, Seigerman DA, Cole BJ. Rehabilitation after autologous chondrocyte implantation in athletes. Clin Sports Med 2010; 29 (2) 267-282 , viii
  • 5 Alford JW, Cole BJ. Cartilage restoration, part 1: basic science, historical perspective, patient evaluation, and treatment options. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (2) 295-306
  • 6 Alford JW, Cole BJ. Cartilage restoration, part 2: techniques, outcomes, and future directions. Am J Sports Med 2005; 33 (3) 443-460
  • 7 Khan KM, Scott A. Mechanotherapy: how physical therapists' prescription of exercise promotes tissue repair. Br J Sports Med 2009; 43 (4) 247-252
  • 8 Beaupré LA, Davies DM, Jones CA, Cinats JG. Exercise combined with continuous passive motion or slider board therapy compared with exercise only: a randomized controlled trial of patients following total knee arthroplasty. Phys Ther 2001; 81 (4) 1029-1037
  • 9 Bible JE, Simpson AK, Biswas D, Pelker RR, Grauer JN. Actual knee motion during continuous passive motion protocols is less than expected. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467 (10) 2656-2661
  • 10 Ebert JR, Lloyd DG, Ackland T, Wood DJ. Knee biomechanics during walking gait following matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010; 25 (10) 1011-1017
  • 11 Della Villa S, Kon E, Filardo G , et al. Does intensive rehabilitation permit early return to sport without compromising the clinical outcome after arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in highly competitive athletes?. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (1) 68-77
  • 12 Logerstedt DS, Snyder-Mackler L, Ritter RC, Axe MJ ; Orthopedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association. Knee pain and mobility impairments: meniscal and articular cartilage lesions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2010; 40 (6) A1-A35
  • 13 Spencer JD, Hayes KC, Alexander IJ. Knee joint effusion and quadriceps reflex inhibition in man. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1984; 65 (4) 171-177
  • 14 Whitelaw GP, DeMuth KA, Demos HA, Schepsis A, Jacques E. The use of the Cryo/Cuff versus ice and elastic wrap in the postoperative care of knee arthroscopy patients. Am J Knee Surg 1995; 8 (1) 28-30 , discussion 30–31
  • 15 Woolf SK, Barfield WR, Merrill KD, McBryde Jr AM. Comparison of a continuous temperature-controlled cryotherapy device to a simple icing regimen following outpatient knee arthroscopy. J Knee Surg 2008; 21 (1) 15-19
  • 16 Della Villa S, Kon E, Filardo G , et al. Does intensive rehabilitation permit early return to sport without compromising the clinical outcome after arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in highly competitive athletes?. Am J Sports Med 2010; 38 (1) 68-77
  • 17 Ebert JR, Robertson WB, Lloyd DG, Zheng MH, Wood DJ, Ackland T. Traditional vs accelerated approaches to post-operative rehabilitation following matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI): comparison of clinical, biomechanical and radiographic outcomes. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2008; 16 (10) 1131-1140
  • 18 Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR. Objective criteria for return to athletics after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and subsequent reinjury rates: a systematic review. Phys Sportsmed 2011; 39 (3) 100-110
  • 19 Mithoefer K, Hambly K, Della Villa S, Silvers H, Mandelbaum BR. Return to sports participation after articular cartilage repair in the knee: scientific evidence. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (Suppl. 01) 167S-176S
  • 20 Neeter C, Gustavsson A, Thomeé P, Augustsson J, Thomeé R, Karlsson J. Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (6) 571-580
  • 21 Fuller CW, Walker J. Quantifying the functional rehabilitation of injured football players. Br J Sports Med 2006; 40 (2) 151-157 , discussion 151–157
  • 22 Wang C, Ao Y, Wang J, Hu Y, Cui G, Yu J. Septic arthritis after arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a retrospective analysis of incidence, presentation, treatment, and cause. Arthroscopy 2009; 25 (3) 243-249
  • 23 Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 1. N Am J Sports Phys Ther 2006; 1 (2) 62-72
  • 24 Cook G, Burton L, Hoogenboom B. Pre-participation screening: the use of fundamental movements as an assessment of function - part 2. N Am J Sports Phys Ther 2006; 1 (3) 132-139
  • 25 Kiesel K, Plisky PJ, Voight ML. Can serious injury in professional football be predicted by a pre-season functional movement screen?. N Am J Sports Phys Ther 2007; 2 (3) 147-158
  • 26 Marmor S, Farman T, Lortat-Jacob A. Joint infection after knee arthroscopy: medicolegal aspects. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2009; 95 (4) 278-283
  • 27 Hoppener MR, Ettema HB, Henny CP, Verheyen CC, Büller HR. Low incidence of deep vein thrombosis after knee arthroscopy without thromboprophylaxis: a prospective cohort study of 335 patients. Acta Orthop 2006; 77 (5) 767-771
  • 28 Ilahi O, Reddy J, Ahmad I. Deep venous thrombosis after knee athroscopy: a meta-analysis. Arthroscopy 2005; 21 (6) 727-730
  • 29 Fisher WD. Impact of venous thromboembolism on clinical management and therapy after hip and knee arthroplasty. Can J Surg 2011; 54 (5) 344-351
  • 30 Yenchak AJ, Wilk KE, Arrigo CA, Simpson CD, Andrews JR. Criteria-based management of an acute multistructure knee injury in a professional football player: a case report. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2011; 41 (9) 675-686