Zahnmedizin up2date, Table of Contents Zahnmedizin up2date 2013; 7(3): 227-241DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1324998 Varia Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York Dentale digitale Volumentomographie – aktueller Stand Ralf Schulze Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article All articles of this category Full Text References Literatur 1 European Commission. Radiation Protection No 154: European Guidance on Estimating Population Doses from Medical X-Ray Procedures: ANNEX 1 – DD Report 1. 2008 2 Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz. Jahresbericht 2009. 3 Bundesregierung BRD. Verordnung zur Änderung der Röntgenverordnung und anderer atomrechtlicher Verordnungen: Röntgenverordnung; 2002 (G5702). 4 European Commission. Radiation protection No 172: Cone beam ct for dental and maxillofacial radiology. Evidence based guidelines: A report prepared by the sedentexct project, 2011. 2012. (v2.0) 5 Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, White SC. Patient risk related to common dental radiografic examinations: the impact of 2007 International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations regarding dose calculation. Journal of the American Dental Association (1939) 2008; 139: 1237-1243 6 Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008; 106: 930-938 7 Schulze R, Schulze D, Ahlers O et al. Dentale Volumentomographie (DVT) – S1-Empfehlung. Deutsche Zahnärztl Z 2009; 64: 490-496 8 Scarfe WC, Farman AG. What is cone-beam CT and how does it work?. Dent Clin North Am 2008; 52: 707-730 9 Kalender WA, Kyriakou Y. Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol 2007; 17: 2767-2779 10 Feldkamp LA, Davis LC, Kress JW. Practical cone-beam algorithm. J Opt Soc Am A 1984; 1: 612-619 11 Mueller K. Fast and accurate three-dimensional reconstruction from cone-beam projection data using algebraic methods. Ohio, USA: The Ohio State University; 1998 12 Groß D, Heil U, Schulze R et al. GPU-based volume-reconstruction from very few arbitrarily aligned x-ray images. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing 2009; 31: 4204-4221 13 Stuehmer C, Blum KS, Kokemueller H et al. Influence of different types of guns, projectiles, and propellants on patterns of injury to the viscerocranium. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2009; 67: 775-781 14 Schulze R, Heil U, Groß D, Bruellmann D et al. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillo fac Radiol 2011; 40: 265-273 15 Schulze RKW, Berndt D, dʼHoedt B. On Cone-Beam Computed Tomography artifacts induced by titanium implants. Clin Oral Impl Res 2010; 21: 100-107 16 de Kinkelder R, Kalkman J, Faber DJ et al. Heartbeat-induced axial motion artifacts in optical coherence tomography measurements of the retina. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 3908-3913 17 European Commission. Radiation Protection No. 162: Radiation criteria for acceptability of medical radiological equipment used in diagnostic radiology nuclear medicine and radiotherapy. 2012 18 Farman AG, Farman TT. A comparison of 18 different x-ray detectors currently used in dentistry. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2005; 99: 485-489 19 Muche-Borowski C, Kopp I. Wie eine Leitlinie entsteht. Z Herz-Thorax-Gefäßchir 2011; 25: 217-223 20 Deutsche Gesellschaft für Implantologie. Indikation für die radiologische 3D-Diagnostik und navigierte Implantatinsertion: Leitlinie; 2011. 2011 21 Valentin J. The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. Publication 103. Ann ICRP 2007; 37: 1-332 22 Pauwels R, Beinsberger J, Collaert B et al. Effective dose range for dental cone beam computed tomography scanners. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: 267-271 23 Lofthag-Hansen S, Thilander-Klang A, Ekestubbe A et al. Calculating effective dose on a cone beam computed tomography device: 3D Accuitomo and 3D Accuitomo FPD. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 72-79 24 Okano T, Harata Y, Sugihara Y et al. Absorbed and effective doses from cone beam volumetric imaging for implant planning. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 79-85 25 Qu X, Li G, Ludlow JB et al. Effective radiation dose of ProMax 3D cone-beam computerized tomography scanner with different dental protocols. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2010; 110: 770-776 26 Roberts JA, Drage NA, Davies J, Thomas DW. Effective dose from cone beam CT examinations in dentistry. Br J Radiol 2009; 82: 35-40 27 Silva MAG, Wolf U, Heinicke F et al. Cone-beam computed tomography for routine orthodontic treatment planning: a radiation dose evaluation. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 2008; 133: 640.e1-5 28 Hirsch E, Wolf U, Heinicke F, Silva MAG. Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2008; 37: 268-273 29 Loubele M, Bogaerts R, Van Dijck E et al. Comparison between effective radiation dose of CBCT and MSCT scanners for dentomaxillofacial applications. Eur J Radiol 2009; 71: 461-468 30 Suomalainen A, Kiljunen T, Käser Y et al. Dosimetry and image quality of four dental cone beam computed tomography scanners compared with multislice computed tomography scanners. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2009; 38: 367-378 31 Bundesregierung BRD. Richtlinie Fachkunde und Kenntnisse im Strahlenschutz bei dem Betrieb von Röntgeneinrichtungen in der Medizin oder Zahnmedizin. Gemeinsames Ministerialblatt 2003; 54: 638ff 32 Bundesregierung BRD. Richtlinie Fachkunde und Kenntnisse im Strahlenschutz bei dem Betrieb von Röntgeneinrichtungen in der Medizin oder Zahnmedizin. Gemeinsames Ministerialblatt 2012; 40: 724 33 Bundesregierung BRD. Richtlinie zur Durchführung der Qualitätssicherung bei Röntgeneinrichtungen zur Untersuchung oder Behandlung von Menschen – Qualitätssicherungs-Richtlinie (QS-RL). Gemeinsames Ministerialblatt 2003;
