Zahnmedizin up2date, Table of Contents Zahnmedizin up2date 2013; 7(5): 409-425DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1325091 Prothetik Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York Cerec-Verfahren Update Sven Reich Recommend Article Abstract Buy Article All articles of this category Full Text References Literatur 1 Bindl A, Ritter L, Mehl A. Digital 3-D implant planning: Cerec meets Galileos. Int J Comput Dent 2010; 13: 221-231 2 Ender A. Cerec Basiswissen 4.0. Bensheim: Sirona Dental Systems GmbH; 2011 3 Sirona Dental Systems. Cerec SW 4.0 Handbuch für den Anwender; Bensheim: Sirona Dental Systems GmbH. 2011 4 Reiss B. Occlusal surface design with Cerec 3D. Int J Comput Dent 2003; 6: 333-342 5 Mehl A, Ender A et al. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009; 12: 11-28 6 Ender A, Mehl A. Full arch scans: conventional versus digital impressions-an in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011; 14: 11-21 7 Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning stragegies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems camera. Int J Comput Dent 2013; 16: 11-21 8 Bindl A, Mormann WH. Clinical and SEM evaluation of all-ceramic chair-side CAD/CAM-generated partial crowns. Eur J Oral Sci 2003; 111: 163-169 9 Posselt A, Kerschbaum T. Longevity of 2328 chairside Cerec inlays and onlays. Int J Comput Dent 2003; 6: 231-248 10 Reich S, Gozdowski S, Trentzsch L et al. Marginal fit of heat-pressed vs. CAD/CAM processed all-ceramic onlays using a milling unit prototype. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 644-650 11 Reich S, Uhlen S et al. Measurement of cement thickness under lithium disilicate crowns using an impression material technique. Clin Oral Investig 2010; 15: 521-526 12 Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression techniques and workflow. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 13 Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L et al. The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow – the comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Investig 2013; 14 Reiss B. Clinical results of Cerec inlays in a dental practice over a period of 18 years. Int J Comput Dent 2006; 9: 11-22 15 Otto T, Schneider D. Long-term clinical results of chairside Cerec CAD/CAM inlays and onlays: a case series. Int J Prosthodont 2008; 21: 53-59 16 Reich S, Schierz O. Chair-side generated posterior lithium disilicate crowns after 4 years. Clin Oral Investig 2012; 17: 1765-1772 17 Wiedhahn K, Kerschbaum T, Fasbinder DF. Clinical long-term results with 617 Cerec veneers: a nine-year report. Int J Comput Dent 2005; 8: 233-246 18 Mehl A, Kunzelmann KH et al. Stabilization effects of CAD/CAM ceramic restorations in extended MOD cavities. J Adhes Dent 2004; 6: 239-245 19 Frankenberger R, Krämer N, Appelt A et al. Chairside vs. labside ceramic inlays: effect of temporary restoration and adhesive luting on enamel cracks and marginal integrity. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 892-898 20 Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Taschner M et al. Adhesive luting revisited: influence of adhesive, temporary cement, cavity cleaning, and curing mode on internal dentin bond strength. J Adhes Dent 2007; 9 (Suppl. 02) 269-273 21 Kablowski M, Wiedhahn K. Konzepte zur wirtschaftlichen Optimierung der CEREC-Behandlung. Persönliche Mitteilung. 22 Reich SM, Wichmann M et al. Effect of surface treatment on the shear bond strength of three resin cements to a machinable feldspatic ceramic. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2005; 74: 740-746 23 Reich S. Selbstadhäsive versus adhäsive Befestigung. Quintessenz 2012; 63: 1587-1593 24 Fasbinder DJ, Dennison JB et al. The clinical performance of CAD/CAM-generated composite inlays. J Am Dent Assoc 2005; 136: 1714-1723 25 Böhrs R, Kablowski M et al. The Cerec assistance. In: Mörmann WH, Hrsg. CAD/CIM in Aesthetic Dentistry. Berlin: Quintessenz; 1996: 277-291 26 Wurbs M, Simon JF, Troeltzsch M et al. Dentist-time expenditure for two different adhesive all-ceramic systems. J Dent 2006; 34 (7) 450-453
