Download PDF
Endoscopy 2013; 45(08): 605-618
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326640
Original article
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Guide wire-assisted cannulation for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

F. Tse
Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
Y. Yuan
Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
P. Moayyedi
Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
,
G. I. Leontiadis
Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University, Hamilton Health Sciences Centre, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 05 November 2012

accepted after revision 22 February 2013

Publication Date:
27 June 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Background and study aims: Cannulation techniques are recognized to be important in causing post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis (PEP). However, considerable controversy exists about the usefulness of the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique for the prevention of PEP. This systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) aimed to compare the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique with the contrast-assisted cannulation technique.

Methods: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and abstracts from Digestive Disease Week and the United European Gastroenterology Week were searched up to February 2012 for RCTs comparing the guide wire-assisted ERCP cannulation technique with the conventional contrast-assisted ERCP cannulation technique. The risk of bias was assessed, and outcomes were pooled by meta-analysis (random-effects model). The primary outcome measure was PEP. Secondary outcome measures included severity of PEP, primary common bile duct (CBD) cannulation success, overall CBD cannulation success, precut sphincterotomy, and other ERCP-related complications.

Results: In total, 12 RCTs (3450 patients) were included. The guide wire-assisted cannulation technique significantly reduced PEP compared with the contrast-assisted cannulation technique (risk ratio [RR] 0.51, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.32 – 0.82). In addition, the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique was associated with greater primary cannulation success (RR 1.07, 95 %CI 1.00 – 1.15), fewer precut sphincterotomies (RR 0.75, 95 %CI 0.60 – 0.95), and no increase in other ERCP-related complications. Subgroup analyses indicated that this significant risk reduction in PEP with the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique existed only in “non-crossover” trials (RR 0.22, 95 %CI 0.12 – 0.42). The results were robust in sensitivity analyses.

Conclusion: Compared with the contrast-assisted cannulation technique, the guide wire-assisted cannulation technique increases the primary cannulation rate and reduces the risk of PEP, and therefore appears to be the most appropriate first-line cannulation technique.

 

  • References

  • 1 Cotton PB, Lehman G, Vennes J et al. Endoscopic sphincterotomy complications and their management: an attempt at consensus. Gastrointest Endosc 1991; 37: 383-393
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Freeman ML, Guda NM. Prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a comprehensive review. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 845-864
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Cheng CL, Sherman S, Watkins JL et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101: 139-147
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Freeman ML, Disario JA, Nelson DB et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective, multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 54: 425-434
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Freeman ML, Nelson DB, Sherman S et al. Complications of endoscopic biliary sphincterotomy. N Engl J Med 1996; 335: 909-918
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Loperfido S, Angelini G, Benedetti G et al. Major early complications from diagnostic and therapeutic ERCP: a prospective multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 1-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Testoni PA, Mariani A, Giussani A et al. Risk factors for post-ERCP pancreatitis in high- and low-volume centers and among expert and non-expert operators: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 1753-1761
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Vandervoort J, Soetikno RM, Tham TC et al. Risk factors for complications after performance of ERCP. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 56: 652-656
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Wang P, Li ZS, Liu F et al. Risk factors for ERCP-related complications: a prospective multicenter study. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 31-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Williams EJ, Taylor S, Fairclough P et al. Risk factors for complication following ERCP; results of a large-scale, prospective multicenter study. Endoscopy 2007; 39: 793-801
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Freeman ML, Guda NM. ERCP cannulation: a review of reported techniques. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: 112-125
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Elmunzer BJ, Scheiman JM, Lehman GA et al. A randomized trial of rectal indomethacin to prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 1414-1422
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Testoni PA. Facts and fiction in the pharmacologic prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a never-ending story. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 64: 732-734
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Higgins JP, Altman DG. Assessing risk of bias in included studies. In: Higgins J, Green S, eds. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons; 2008: 187-206
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Testoni PA. Why the incidence of post-ERCP pancreatitis varies considerably? Factors affecting the diagnosis and the incidence of this complication. JOP 2002; 3: 195-201
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ et al. Post ERCP pancreatitis and precut needle knife sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective evaluation of the relationship [abstract]. Endoscopy 2006; 38: A24
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ito K, Mimura T, Hara S et al. Device and handle of difficult bile duct cannulation [abstract]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 25: A30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Kamata K, Kitano M, Kudov M et al. Does wire guided cannulation reduce the risk of pancreatic disorder? [abstract]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 26: 38
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lee YT, Chan FK, Sung JJ. Selective biliary cannulation aided by pancreatic duct guided technique (PDGT) [abstract]. Endoscopy 2004; 36: A160
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mariani A, Giussani A, Di LM et al. Guidewire biliary cannulation does not reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis compared with the contrast injection technique in low-risk and high-risk patients. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 339-346
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nakai Y, Isayama H, Tsujino T et al. Impact of introduction of wire-guided cannulation in therapeutic biliary endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 26: 1552-1558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Trifan A, Sfarti C, Cretu M et al. Guide-wire versus conventional contrast cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis in patients with choledocholithiasis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2011; 20: 149-152
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Angsuwatcharakon P, Ridtitid W, Rerknimitr R et al. Pancreatic guide-wire placement assisting biliary cannulation (double guide-wire) versus precut sphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation: a prospective randomized study [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: AB164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Angsuwatcharakon P, Rerknimitr R, Ridtitid W et al. Success rate and cannulation time between precut sphincterotomy and double-guidewire technique in truly difficult biliary cannulation. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2012; 27: 356-361
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Balderas V, Linsteadt J, Surapaneni SN et al. Does implementation of the double wire technique and prophylactic pancreatic duct stenting reduce post (ERCP) pancreatitis in patients undergoing needle Knife Sphincterotomy [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73 : AB268
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Cha SW, Yoo YW, Kim A et al. Double guidewire technique versus transpancreatic precutSphincterotomy in difficult biliary cannulation; randomized prospective Study [abstract]. Gastrointest Endoscopy 2011; 73 (04) AB348
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Cote GA, Hovis CE, Keswani RN et al. A randomized clinical trial comparing the use of a pancreatic duct stent or a pancreatic duct guidewire to facilitate bile duct cannulation [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: AB163-AB164
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 de Tejada AH, Calleja JL, Díaz G et al. Double guide wire technique compared to conventional method in selected cases of difficult common bile duct cannulation in ERCP. Preliminary data from a controlled randomized study [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: AB231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 deTejada AH, Calleja JL, Diaz G et al. Double-guidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation: a multicenter randomized, controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 700-709
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ito K, Fujita N, Noda Y et al. Pancreatic guidewire placement for achieving selective biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography. World J Gastroenterol 2008; 14: 5595-600
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Maeda S, Hayashi H, Hosokawa O et al. Prospective randomized pilot trial of selective biliary cannulation using pancreatic guide-wire placement. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 721-724
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Zheng FP, Guo YW, Tao LI et al. Double-guidewire technique for difficult bile duct cannulation in patients with biliary [abstract]. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 25: A51
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM et al. Can a wire-guided cannulation technique increase bile duct cannulation rate and prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Gastroenterol 2009; 104: 2343-2350
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Cheung J, Tsoi KK, Quan WL et al. Guidewire versus conventional contrast cannulation of the common bile duct for the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1211-1219
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Choudhary A, Puli SR, Ibdah JA et al. Guidewire use for prevention of post ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: AB309
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Choudhary A, Szary NM, Arif M et al. Does guidewire use in the pancreatic duct during deep biliary cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A meta-analysis [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: AB302
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Choudhary A, Szary NM, Arif M et al. Does guidewire use prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: AB163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Epstein I, Gruchy S, MacIntosh D. Wire guided cannulation versus conventional contrast injection in ERCP: a systematic review [abstract]. Can J Gastroenterol 2009; 23: 264
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Madhoun M, Te CC, Stoner J et al. Does wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A meta-analysis [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: AB132
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Shao LM, Chen QY, Chen MY et al. Can wire-guided cannulation reduce the risk of post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography pancreatitis? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009; 24: 1710-1715
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Artifon EL, Sakai P, Hondo FY et al. Comparison of deep bile duct cannulation with cannulatome versus cannulatome with guide wire: a prospective randomized trial [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 61: AB198
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ et al. Guidewire cannulation improves primary success rates but does not protect against post ERCP pancreatitis: final results of a prospective randomised trial [abstract]. Endoscopy 2006; 38: A 24
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Bailey AA, Lynch PM, Lee EY et al. Results of a randomised trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post ERCP pancreatitis [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 5: AB284
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Nambu T, Ukita T, Shigoka H et al. Wire-guided selective cannulation of the bile duct with a sphincterotome: a prospective randomized comparative study with the standard method: an interim report [abstract]. Endoscopy 2009; 41 : A24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Park DH, Lee TH, Park JY et al. Can wire-guided cannulation (WGC) prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2008; 67: AB328
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Apostolopoulos P, Alexandrakis G, Liatsos C et al. Guide wire-assisted selective access to the common bile duct could prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis [abstract]. Endoscopy 2005; 37 : A278
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Artifon EL, Sakai P, Cunha JE et al. Guidewire cannulation reduces risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis and facilitates bile duct cannulation. Am J Gastroenterol 2007; 102: 2147-2153
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Bailey AA, Bourke MJ, Williams SJ et al. A prospective randomized trial of cannulation technique in ERCP: effects on technical success and post-ERCP pancreatitis. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 296-301
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Gruchy S, Macintosh DG, Farina D et al. Is the incidence of post-endoscopic cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis reduced in patients undergoing hydrophilic guide wire cannulation of the common bile duct (CBD) versus standard cannulation with dye injection: a randomized controlled trial [abstract]. Gastroenterology 2007; 132: A643
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Katsinelos P, Paroutoglou G, Kountouras J et al. A comparative study of standard ERCP catheter and hydrophilic guide wire in the selective cannulation of the common bile duct. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 302-307
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Kawakami H, Maguchi H, Mukai T et al. A multicenter, prospective, randomized study of selective bile duct cannulation performed by multiple endoscopists: the BIDMEN study. Gastrointest Endosc 2012; 75: 362-372
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Kobayashi G, Fujita N, Imaizumi K et al. Risk factors for Post-ERCP pancreatitis: evaluation in a prospective randomized trial comparing the guidewire cannulation technique with the conventional cannulation technique. Pancreatology 2010; 10: 94-95
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Lee TH, Park dH, Park JY et al. Can wire-guided cannulation prevent post-ERCP pancreatitis? A prospective randomized trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 444-449
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Lella F, Bagnolo F, Colombo E et al. A simple way of avoiding post-ERCP pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: 830-834
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Mangiavillano B, Mariani A, Giussani A et al. Guidewire assisted cannulation of the papilla of Vater to reduce the risk of post-ERCP pancreatitis: a prospective randomised study [abstract]. Endoscopy 2007; 39: A373
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Mangiavillano B, Mangano M, Limido E et al. Preliminary results on the comparison of loop-tip COOK MEDICAL® Wire vs traditional endoscopic technique cannulation in the prevention of post-ERCP pancreatitis and biliary tree access in high-risk patients [abstract]. Endoscopy 2011; 43 : A86
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Nambu T, Ukita T, Shigoka H et al. Wire-guided selective cannulation of the bile duct with a sphincterotome: a prospective randomized comparative study with the standard method. Scand J Gastroenterol 2011; 46: 109-115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Ioannidis JP, Trikalinos TA. The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey. CMAJ 2007; 176: 1091-1096
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Sterne JA, Gavaghan D, Egger M. Publication and related bias in meta-analysis: power of statistical tests and prevalence in the literature. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 1119-1129
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Terrin N, Schmid CH, Lau J et al. Adjusting for publication bias in the presence of heterogeneity. Stat Med 2003; 22: 2113-2126
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Lohr JM, Aabaken L, Arnelo U et al. How to cannulate? A survey of the Scandinavian Association for Digestive Endoscopy (SADE) in 141 endoscopists. Scand J Gastroenterol 2012; 47: 861-869
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Perdue DG, Freeman ML. ERCOSTstudy group. Failed biliary ERCP: a sprospective multicenter study of risk factors, complications and resource utilization [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 2004; 59: P192
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Cennamo V, Fuccio L, Zagari RM et al. Can early precut implementation reduce endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-related complication risk? Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Endoscopy 2010; 42: 381-388
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Masci E, Mariani A, Curioni S et al. Risk factors for pancreatitis following endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2003; 35: 830-834
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Choudhary A, Bechtold ML, Arif M et al. Pancreatic stents for prophylaxis against post-ERCP pancreatitis: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 275-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Cortas GA, Mehta SN, Abraham NS et al. Selective cannulation of the common bile duct: a prospective randomized trial comparing standard catheters with sphincterotomes. Gastrointest Endosc 1999; 50: 775-779
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Schwacha H, Allgaier HP, Deibert P et al. A sphincterotome-based technique for selective transpapillary common bile duct cannulation. Gastrointest Endosc 2000; 52: 387-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 68 Testoni PA, Bagnolo F, Natale C et al. Incidence of post-endoscopic retrograde-cholangiopancreatography/sphincterotomy pancreatitis depends upon definition criteria. Dig Liver Dis 2000; 32: 412-418
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar