J Knee Surg 2012; 25(04): 287-294
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1326998
Special Focus Section
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Current Concepts in Knee Dislocations: PCL, ACL, and Medial Sided Injuries

James P. Stannard
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Missouri Hospital, Columbia, Missouri
,
Kathryn L. Bauer
1   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Missouri Hospital, Columbia, Missouri
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

02 July 2012

22 July 2012

Publication Date:
20 September 2012 (online)

Abstract

Dislocations resulting in multiligament knee injuries are challenging to treat and diagnose. With proper diagnosis and anatomic reconstruction techniques, patients can have successful outcomes. This article describes the senior author's (J.P.S.'s) preferred reconstruction techniques, timing for surgery, and rehabilitation techniques for injuries involving the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), posterior cruciate ligament (PCL), and posteromedial corner (PMC). We prefer to address these injuries in a staged fashion. The PCL, PMC, and any additional meniscal pathology are addressed in the index procedure. The ACL is reconstructed approximately 6 weeks later to ensure that acceptable range of motion has been regained. Staging procedures also allow time to maximize rehabilitation protocols for both the PCL and the ACL.

 
  • References

  • 1 Schenck Jr RC. The dislocated knee. Instr Course Lect 1994; 43: 127-136
  • 2 Stannard JP, Sheils TM, Lopez-Ben RR, McGwin Jr G, Robinson JT, Volgas DA. Vascular injuries in knee dislocations: the role of physical examination in determining the need for arteriography. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (5) 910-915
  • 3 Levy BA, Fanelli GC, Whelan DB , et al. Controversies in the treatment of knee dislocations and multiligament reconstruction. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2009; 17 (4) 197-206
  • 4 Mills WJ, Barei DP, McNair P. The value of the ankle-brachial index for diagnosing arterial injury after knee dislocation: a prospective study. J Trauma 2004; 56 (6) 1261-1265
  • 5 Niall DM, Nutton RW, Keating JF. Palsy of the common peroneal nerve after traumatic dislocation of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87 (5) 664-667
  • 6 LaPrade RF, Engebretsen AH, Ly TV, Johansen S, Wentorf FA, Engebretsen L. The anatomy of the medial part of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (9) 2000-2010
  • 7 Petersen W, Loerch S, Schanz S, Raschke M, Zantop T. The role of the posterior oblique ligament in controlling posterior tibial translation in the posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 2008; 36 (3) 495-501
  • 8 Robinson JR, Sanchez-Ballester J, Bull AM, Thomas RdeW, Amis AA. The posteromedial corner revisited. An anatomical description of the passive restraining structures of the medial aspect of the human knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86 (5) 674-681
  • 9 Robinson JR, Bull AM, Thomas RR, Amis AA. The role of the medial collateral ligament and posteromedial capsule in controlling knee laxity. Am J Sports Med 2006; 34 (11) 1815-1823
  • 10 Stannard JP, Black BS, Azbell C, Volgas DA. Posteromedial corner injury in knee dislocations. J Knee Surg 2012; ; August 3 (Epub ahead of print)
  • 11 Sims WF, Jacobson KE. The posteromedial corner of the knee: medial-sided injury patterns revisited. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (2) 337-345
  • 12 Lonner JH, Dupuy DE, Siliski JM. Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging with operative findings in acute traumatic dislocations of the adult knee. J Orthop Trauma 2000; 14 (3) 183-186
  • 13 Stannard JP, Riley RS, Sheils TM, McGwin Jr G, Volgas DA. Anatomic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament after multiligament knee injuries. A combination of the tibial-inlay and two-femoral-tunnel techniques. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31 (2) 196-202
  • 14 Stannard JP, McKean RM. Anatomic PCL rReconstruction: the double bundle inlay technique. Oper Tech Sports Med 2009; 17: 148-155
  • 15 Berg EE. Posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1995; 11 (1) 69-76
  • 16 Markolf KL, Zemanovic JR, McAllister DR. Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A (4) 518-524
  • 17 Hiraga Y, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Toh HT. Biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques using cyclic loading tests. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (1) 13-19
  • 18 Zehms CT, Whiddon DR, Miller MD , et al. Comparison of a double bundle arthroscopic inlay and open inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using clinically relevant tools: a cadaveric study. Arthroscopy 2008; 24 (4) 472-480
  • 19 Garofalo R, Jolles BM, Moretti B, Siegrist O. Double-bundle transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a tendon-patellar bone-semitendinosus tendon autograft: clinical results with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (12) 1331-1338 , e1
  • 20 Jenner JM, van der Hart CP, Willems WJ. Mid-term results of arthroscopic reconstruction in chronic posterior cruciate ligament instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2006; 14 (9) 848-853
  • 21 MacGillivray JD, Stein BE, Park M, Allen AA, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF. Comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for isolated posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 2006; 22 (3) 320-328