Moving from a Mechanical Microkeratome to a Femtosecond Laser for
                    LASIK to Correct Astigmatic Patients: Clinical Outcomes of a Retrospective,
                    Consecutive, Comparative Study

I. Guber; L. Moetteli; L. Magnin; F. Majo

doi:10.1055/s-0032-1328384

Klinische Monatsblätter für Augenheilkunde, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2013; 230(4): 337-341
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328384

Studie

Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Moving from a Mechanical Microkeratome to a Femtosecond Laser for LASIK to Correct Astigmatic Patients: Clinical Outcomes of a Retrospective, Consecutive, Comparative Study

Wechsel von einem mechanischen Mikrokeratom auf einen Femtosekunden-Laser zur Korrektur von Astigmatismus mittels LASIK: klinische Ergebnisse einer retrospektiven, konsekutiven Vergleichsstudie

Autoren

I. Guber

¹Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, University of Lausanne, Switzerland (Chairman: Prof. Dr. med. L. Zografos)

²Eye Clinic, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Switzerland (Chairman: Prof. Dr. med. J. Stürmer)
L. Moetteli

¹Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, University of Lausanne, Switzerland (Chairman: Prof. Dr. med. L. Zografos)
L. Magnin

¹Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, University of Lausanne, Switzerland (Chairman: Prof. Dr. med. L. Zografos)
F. Majo

¹Jules-Gonin Eye Hospital, University of Lausanne, Switzerland (Chairman: Prof. Dr. med. L. Zografos)

Abstract

Background: To evaluate outcomes after optimized laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for astigmatism correction with flap created by a mechanical microkeratome or a femtosecond laser. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 102 eyes of 71 consecutive patients were enrolled undergoing optimized LASIK treatments using the Allegretto laser system (WaveLight Laser Technologie AG, Erlangen, Germany). A mechanical microkeratome for flap creation was used (One Use, Moria®) in 46 eyes (31 patients, spherical equivalent [SE] −4.44 D ± 2.4) and a femtosecond laser was used (LDV, Ziemer®) in 56 eyes (40 patients, spherical equivalent [SE] −3.07 D ± 3.3). The two groups were matched for inclusion criteria and were operated under similar conditions by the same surgeon. Results: Overall, the preoperative spherical equivalent was −9.5 diopters (D) to +3.37 D; the preoperative manifest astigmatism was between −1.5 D and −3.5 D. At 6 months postoperatively, the mean postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 0.93 ± 0.17 (range 0.4 to 1.2) in the Moria group and 1.0 ± 0.21 (range 0.6 to 1.6) in the Femto group, which was statistically significant (p = 0.003). Comparing the cylinder power there was a statistical difference between the two groups (p = 0.0015). Conclusions: This study shows that the method of flap creation has a significant impact on postoperative astigmatism with a significantly better postoperative UDVA in the Femto group. These findings suggest that the femtosecond laser provides a better platform for LASIK treatment of astigmatism than the commonly used microkeratome.

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund: Ziel war die Auswertung von LASIK-Ergebnissen, wobei die Flaps mit einem Femtosekunden-Laser (LDV, Ziemer) oder einem mechanischen Mikrokeratom (One Use, Moria) erzeugt wurden. Patienten und Methoden: Retrospektive Studie mit 102 Augen von 71 konsekutiven Patienten nach optimierter LASIK mit dem Allegretto Laser System (WaveLight Laser Technologie AG, Erlangen, Germany). Ein mechanisches Mikrokeratom zur Flaperzeugung wurde (One Use, Moria®) bei 46 Augen benutzt (31 Patienten, sphärisches Equivalent [SE] −4,44 D ± 2,4), ein Femtosekunden-Laser (LDV, Ziemer®) bei 56 Augen (40 Patienten, SE −3,07 D ± 3,3). Die beiden Gruppen wurden abgeglichen und unter ähnlichen Bedingungen operiert. Ergebnisse: Insgesamt betrug das präoperative SE −9,5 Dioptrien (D) bis +3,37 D; der präoperative Astigmatismus war zwischen −1,5 D und −3,5 D. Nach 6 Monaten betrug die durchschnittliche unkorrigierte Sehschärfe 0,93 ± 0,17 (von 0,4 bis 1,2) in der Moria-Gruppe und 1,0 ± 0,21 (von 0,6 bis 1,6) in der Femto-Gruppe. Dieser Unterschied war statistisch signifikant (p = 0,003). Bei der Zylinderstärke fand sich ebenfalls ein statistisch signifikanter Unterschied zugunsten der Femto-Gruppe (p = 0,0015). Schlussfolgerungen: Die Studie zeigt auf, dass die Methode der Flap-Erzeugung einen signifikanten Einfluss auf den postoperativen Astigmatismus hat und mit einer besseren postoperativen Sehschärfe in der Femto-Gruppe assoziiert ist. Diese Resultate suggerieren, dass der Femtosekunden-Laser eine bessere Plattform für die LASIK-Behandlung von Astigmatismus bietet als das Mikrokeratom.

Key words

LASIK - Femto-LASIK - microkeratome - femtosecond laser

Schlüsselwörter

LASIK - Femto-LASIK - Mikrokeratom - Femtosekunden-Laser

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Pallikaris IG, Papatzanaki ME, Stathi EZ et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis. Lasers Surg Med 1990; 10: 463-468
2 Buratto L, Ferrari M, Rama P. Excimer laser intrastromal keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 1992; 113: 291-295
3 Sugar A. Ultrafast (femtosecond) laser refractive surgery. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2002; 13: 246-249
4 Lubatschowski H. Overview of commercially available femtosecond lasers in refractive surgery. J Refract Surg 2008; 24: S102-S107
5 Netto MV, Mohan RR, Medeiros FW et al. Femtosecond laser and microkeratome corneal flaps: comparison of stromal wound healing and inflammation. J Refract Surg 2007; 23: 667-676
6 Chen S, Feng Y, Stojanovic A et al. IntraLase femtosecond laser vs. mechanical microkeratomes in LASIK for myopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Refract Surg 2012; 28: 15-24
7 Eydelman MB, Drum B, Holladay J et al. Standardized analyses of correction of astigmatism by laser systems that reshape the cornea. J Refract Surg 2006; 22: 81-95
8 Dupps jr. WJ, Kohnen T, Mamalis N et al. Standardized graphs and terms for refractive surgery results. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 1-3
9 Sharma N, Pangtey MS, Vajpayee RB et al. Surgically induced astigmatism after laser in situ keratomileusis for spherical myopia. J Refract Surg 2002; 18: 239-244
10 Kezirian GM, Stonecipher KG. Comparison of the IntraLase femtosecond laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refr Surg 2004; 30: 804-811
11 Oshika T, Klyce SD, Applegate RA et al. Comparison of corneal wavefront aberrations after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis. Am J Ophthalmol 1999; 127: 1-7
12 Bühren J, Kohnen T. Factors affecting the change in lower-order and higher-order aberrations after wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia with the Zyoptix 3.1 system. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32: 1166-1174
13 Subbaram MV, MacRae SM, Slade SG et al. Customized LASIK treatment for myopia: relationship between preoperative higher order aberrations and refractive outcome. J Refract Surg 2006; 22: 746-753
14 Pallikaris IG, Kymionis GD, Panagopoulou SI et al. Induced optical aberrations following formation of a laser in situ keratomileusis flap. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002; 28: 1737-1741
15 Chalita MR, Chavala S, Xu M et al. Wavefront analysis in post-LASIK eyes and its correlation with visual symptoms, refraction, and topography. Ophthalmology 2004; 111: 447-453
16 Waheed S, Chalita MR, Xu M et al. Flap-induced and laser-induced ocular aberrations in a two-step LASIK procedure. J Refract Surg 2005; 21: 346-352
17 Porter J, MacRae S, Yoon G et al. Separate effects of the microkeratome incision and laser ablation on the eyeʼs wave aberration. Am J Ophthalmol 2003; 136: 327-337
18 Vinciguerra P, Azzolini M, Airaghi P et al. Effect of decreasing surface and interface irregularities after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis on optical and functional outcomes. J Refract Surg 1998; 14: S199-S203
19 Vinciguerra P, Azzolini M, Radice P et al. A method for examining surface and interface irregularities after photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis: predictor of optical and functional outcomes. J Refract Surg 1998; 14: S204-S206
20 Medeiros FW, Stapleton WM, Hammel J et al. Wavefront analysis comparison of LASIK outcomes with the femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratomes. J Refract Surg 2007; 23: 880-887
21 Tran DB, Sarayba MA, Bor Z et al. Randomized prospective clinical study comparing induced aberrations with IntraLase and Hansatome flap creation in fellow eyes: Potential impact on wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005; 31: 97-105
22 Durrie DS, Kezirian GM. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study. J Cataract Refr Surg 2005; 31: 120-126
23 Sarayba MA, Ignacio TS, Binder PS et al. Comparative study of stromal bed quality by using mechanical, IntraLase femtosecond laser 15- and 30-kHz microkeratomes. Cornea 2007; 26: 446-451
24 Buzzonetti L, Petrocelli G, Valente P et al. Comparison of corneal aberration changes after laser in situ keratomileusis performed with mechanical microkeratome and IntraLase femtosecond laser: 1-year follow-up. Cornea 2008; 27: 174-179
25 Kim JY, Kim MJ, Kim T-I et al. A femtosecond laser creates a stronger flap than a mechanical microkeratome. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 599-604