Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1328749
Aktuelle Inzidenz des Trockenen Auges in Deutschland
Updated Incidence of Dry Eye Syndrome in GermanyPublication History
eingereicht 21 March 2013
akzeptiert 05 June 2013
Publication Date:
06 September 2013 (online)
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund: Das Trockene Auge ist eine der häufigsten Erkrankung der Augenoberfläche. Betroffene leiden vor allem unter subjektiven Beschwerden, welche die Lebensqualität beeinträchtigen. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war es, festzustellen, wie Personen mit Trockenen Augen wann und mit welchen Beschwerden in der augenärztlichen Praxis des Niedergelassenen in Deutschland alltäglich vorstellig werden.
Patienten/Material und Methoden: Dafür wurden in deutschen Augenarztpraxen in Sachsen, Sachsen-Anhalt und Bayern 170 Betroffene mit Trockenen Augen nach ihren Beschwerden befragt.
Ergebnisse: Die Mehrzahl der Betroffenen war 40 Jahre und älter (88 %) (im Mittel 60 Jahre), weiblich (59 %) und schilderte mehr als ein subjektives Symptom (65 %). Es zeigte sich ein facettenreiches subjektives Beschwerdebild mit bis zu 5 verschiedenen Symptomen gleichzeitig. Es kommt zu einer deutlichen Zunahme an Erkrankten ab dem 40. (Frauen) bzw. 50. (Männer) Lebensjahr um das > 3,5-Fache.
Schlussfolgerungen: Mit der vorliegenden Arbeit sollte das Verständnis über dieses hoch komplexe Krankheitsbild weiter vervollständigt werden, um diese zumeist chronisch verlaufende Erkrankung mit ihrem anfänglich unscheinbaren Erscheinungsbild bereits frühzeitig zu erkennen, sowie die hier aus der deutschen Bevölkerung erhobenen Daten im internationalen Kontext vergleichend zu analysieren. Trotz großer wissenschaftlicher Anstrengung stellt das Trockene Auge nach wie vor eine besondere und meist schwierige Herausforderung für Patient und Behandelnden dar.
Abstract
Background: Dry eye is one of the most common eye surface disorders. Patients suffer in particular from annoying subjective symptoms that compromise quality of life. The aim of the study was to find out when patients consult ophthalmologists in Germany and what symptoms they present.
Patients/Material and Methods: 170 patients treated at ophthalmological practices in Bavaria, Saxony and Saxony-Anhalt with dry eye were surveyed regarding their symptoms.
Results: The majority of those questioned were 40 years of age or older (88 %) (average: 60), female (59 %) and described a variety of subjective symptoms (65 %). More than five different concurrent symptoms were named. There is a recognisable increase in cases – by more than 3.5 times – at the age of forty (in women) and fifty (in men).
Conclusions: We hope to contribute with the data obtained to a more complete understanding of this highly complex pathological process. A further aim is to facilitate recognition of this mostly chronic condition in its early stages when the symptoms are still poorly defined. The data on the German population obtained here should become part of a comparative analysis within the international context. Despite considerable scientific effort, dry eye remains a difficult challenge for both patients and attending physicians.
-
Literatur
- 1 Foulks GN et al. Report of the International Dry Eye WorkShop (DEWS) 2007. Ocul Surf 2007; 5: 61-204
- 2 Beuerman RW et al. The lacrimal functional unit. In: Pflugfelder SC, Beuerman RW, Stern ME, eds. Dry eye and ocular surface disorders. New York: Marcel Dekker; 2004
- 3 Stern ME et al. The role of the lacrimal functional unit in the pathophysiology of dry eye. Exp Eye Res 2004; 78: 409-416
- 4 Reddy P et al. The economic burden of dry eye: a conceptual framework and preliminary assessment. Cornea 2004; 23: 751-761
- 5 Mertzanis P et al. The relative burden of dry eye in patientsʼ lives: comparisons to a US normative sample. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2005; 46: 46-50
- 6 Erb C et al. Psychosomatische Aspekte bei Patienten mit primärer Keratoconjunctivitis sicca. Klin Monatsbl Augenheilkd 1996; 208: 96-99
- 7 Schaumberg DA et al. The international workshop on meibomian gland dysfunction: report of the subcommittee on the epidemiology of, and associated risk factors for, MGD. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2011; 52: 1994-2005
- 8 Schein OD et al. Prevalence of dry eye among the elderly. Am J Ophthalmol 1997; 124: 723-728
- 9 Schein OD et al. Dry eye and dry mouth in the elderly: a population-based assessment. Arch Intern Med 1999; 159: 1359-1363
- 10 Schaumberg DA et al. Hormone replacement therapy and dry eye syndrome. JAMA 2001; 286: 2114-2119
- 11 Ellwein LB et al. Use of eye care and associated charges among the Medicare population: 1991–1998. Arch Ophthalmol 2002; 120: 804-811
- 12 Yazdani C et al. Prevalence of treated dry eye disease in a managed care population. Clin Ther 2001; 23: 1672-1682
- 13 McCarty CA et al. The epidemiology of dry eye in Melbourne, Australia. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1114-1119
- 14 Bjerrum KB. Keratoconjunctivitis sicca and primary Sjögrenʼs syndrome in a Danish population aged 30–60 years. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 1997; 7: 281-286
- 15 Brewitt H, Zierhut M Hrsg. Trockenes Auge. Heidelberg: Kaden; 2001
- 16 Hikichi T et al. Prevalence of dry eye in Japanese eye centers. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 1995; 233: 555-558
- 17 Doughty MJ et al. A patient questionnaire approach to estimating the prevalence of dry eye symptoms in patients presenting to optometric practices across Canada. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 624-631
- 18 Lin PY et al. Prevalence of dry eye among an elderly Chinese population in Taiwan: the Shihpai Eye Study. Ophthalmology 2003; 110: 1096-1101
- 19 Leitlinien der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft, Nr. 11: Das Trockene Auge. Im Internet: http://www.dog.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/Leitlinie-Nr.-11Trockenes-Auge-_Sicca-Syndrom_-und-Blepharitis1.pdf Stand: August 2011
- 20 McCarty CA et al. The epidemiology of dry eye in Melbourne, Australia. Ophthalmology 1998; 105: 1114-1119
- 21 Christen WG et al. Design of Physiciansʼ Health Study II – a randomized trial of beta-carotine, vitamins E and C, and multivitamins, in prevention of cancer, cardiovascular disease, and eye disease, and review of results of completed trials. Ann Epidemiol 2000; 10: 125-134
- 22 Munoz B et al. Causes of blindness and visual impairment in a population of older Americans: The Salisbury Eye Evaluation Study. Arch Ophthalmol 2000; 118: 819-825
- 23 Doughty MJ et al. A patient questionnaire approach to estimating the prevalence of dry eye symptoms in patients presenting to optometric practices across Canada. Optom Vis Sci 1997; 74: 624-631
- 24 Jacobsson LTH et al. Dry eyes or mouth: an epidemiologic study in swedish adults, with special reference to primary Sjögrenʼs syndrome. J Autoimmun 1989; 2: 521-527
- 25 Nichols JJ et al. Tear film, contact lens, and patient-related factors associated with contact lens-related dry eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2006; 47: 1319-1328
- 26 Obata H et al. Histopathologic study of human lacrimal gland. Statistical analysis with special reference to aging. Ophthalmology 1995; 102: 678-686
- 27 Mathers WD et al. Tear film changes associated with normal aging. Cornea 1996; 15: 229-234
- 28 Tomlinson A et al. Assessment of tear film dynamics: quantification approach. Ocul Surd 2005; 3: 81-95
- 29 Ladwig KH et al. Gender differences of symptom reporting and medical health care utilization in the German population. Eur J Epidemiol 2000; 16: 511-518
- 30 Murube J et al. Triple classification of diagnosis of dry eye. Ocul Surf 2008; 6: 1-8
- 31 Gulati A et al. Validation and repeatability of a short questionnaire for dry eye syndrome. Am J Ophthalmol 2006; 142: 125-131
- 32 Miljanovic B et al. Impact of dry eye syndrome on vision-related quality of life. Am J Ophthalmol 2007; 143: 409-415