J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2013; 74(01): 039-043
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1329625
Original Article
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Evaluation of Variation in the Course of the Facial Nerve, Nerve Adhesion to Tumors, and Postoperative Facial Palsy in Acoustic Neuroma

Tetsuro Sameshima
1   Department of Neurosurgery, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
,
Akio Morita
1   Department of Neurosurgery, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
,
Rokuya Tanikawa
2   Department of Neurosurgery, Abashiri Neurosurgical Hospital, Abashiri, Japan
,
Takanori Fukushima
3   Carolina Neuroscience Institute, Raleigh, North Carolina, United States
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
,
Allan H. Friedman
4   Department of Neurosurgery, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, United States
,
Francesco Zenga
5   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
,
Alessandro Ducati
5   Department of Neurosurgery, University of Torino, Torino, Italy
,
Luciano Mastronardi
6   Department of Neurosurgery, San Filippo Neri Hospital, Roma, Italy
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

21 March 2012

11 June 2012

Publication Date:
26 November 2012 (online)

Abstract

Objective To investigate the variation in the course of the facial nerve (FN) in patients undergoing acoustic neuroma (AN) surgery, its adhesion to tumors, and the relationship between such adhesions and postoperative facial palsy.

Methods The subjects were 356 patients who underwent AN surgery in whom the course of the FN could be confirmed. Patients were classified into six groups: ventro-central surface of the tumor (VCe), ventro-rostral (VR), ventro-caudal (VCa), rostral (R), caudal (C), and dorsal (D).

Results The FN course was VCe in 185 cases, VR in 137, VCa in 19, R in 10, C in 4, and D in one. For tumors < 1.5 cm, VCe was most common. For tumors ≥ 1.5 cm, the proportion of VR increased. No significant difference was observed between the course patterns of the FN in terms of postoperative FN function, but for tumors > 3.0 cm, there was an increasing tendency for the FN to adhere strongly to the tumor capsule, and postoperative facial palsy was more severe in patients with stronger adhesions.

Conclusions The VCe pattern was most common for small tumors. Strong or less strong adhesion to the tumor capsule was most strongly associated with postoperative FN palsy.

 
  • References

  • 1 House JW, Brackmann DE. Facial nerve grading system. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1985; 93: 146-147
  • 2 Fischer G, Fischer C, Rémond J. Hearing preservation in acoustic neurinoma surgery. J Neurosurg 1992; 76: 910-917
  • 3 Glasscock III ME, Hays JW, Minor LB, Haynes DS, Carrasco VN. Preservation of hearing in surgery for acoustic neuromas. J Neurosurg 1993; 78: 864-870
  • 4 House WF, Hitselberger WW. Preservation of the facial nerve in acoustic tumor surgery. Arch Otolaryngol 1968; 88: 655-658
  • 5 Ojemann RG. Management of acoustic neuromas (vestibular schwannomas) (honored guest presentation). Clin Neurosurg 1993; 40: 498-535
  • 6 Samii M, Matthies C. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): the facial nerve—preservation and restitution of function. Neurosurgery 1997; 40: 684-694 , discussion 694–695
  • 7 Samii M, Matthies C. Management of 1000 vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): surgical management and results with an emphasis on complications and how to avoid them. Neurosurgery 1997; 40: 11-21 , discussion 21–23
  • 8 Samii M, Gerganov V, Samii A. Improved preservation of hearing and facial nerve function in vestibular schwannoma surgery via the retrosigmoid approach in a series of 200 patients. J Neurosurg 2006; 105: 527-535
  • 9 Ransohoff J. Microsurgical anatomy of the brainstem surface facing an acoustic neuroma. Surg Neurol 1986; 26: 598 (Letter)
  • 10 Rhoton Jr AL. Microsurgical anatomy of the brainstem surface facing an acoustic neuroma. Surg Neurol 1986; 25: 326-339 (Letter)
  • 11 Rhoton Jr AL, Tedeschi H. Microsurgical anatomy of acoustic neuroma. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 1992; 25: 257-294
  • 12 Moriyama T, Fukushima T, Asaoka K, Roche PH, Barrs DM, McElveen Jr JT. Hearing preservation in acoustic neuroma surgery: importance of adhesion between the cochlear nerve and the tumor. J Neurosurg 2002; 97: 337-340
  • 13 Sameshima T, Fukushima T, McElveen Jr JT, Friedman AH. Critical assessment of operative approaches for hearing preservation in small acoustic neuroma surgery: retrosigmoid vs middle fossa approach. Neurosurgery 2010; 67: 640-644 , discussion 644–645
  • 14 Benecke Jr JE, Calder HB, Chadwick G. Facial nerve monitoring during acoustic neuroma removal. Laryngoscope 1987; 97: 697-700
  • 15 Taoka T, Hirabayashi H, Nakagawa H , et al. Displacement of the facial nerve course by vestibular schwannoma: preoperative visualization using diffusion tensor tractography. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006; 24: 1005-1010
  • 16 Gerganov VM, Giordano M, Samii M, Samii A. Diffusion tensor imaging-based fiber tracking for prediction of the position of the facial nerve in relation to large vestibular schwannomas. J Neurosurg 2011; 115: 1087-1093
  • 17 Sampath P, Rini D, Long DM. Microanatomical variations in the cerebellopontine angle associated with vestibular schwannomas (acoustic neuromas): a retrospective study of 1006 consecutive cases. J Neurosurg 2000; 92: 70-78
  • 18 Bae CW, Cho YH, Hong SH, Kim JH, Lee JK, Kim CJ. The anatomical location and course of the facial nerve in vestibular schwannomas : a study of 163 surgically treated cases. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2007; 42: 450-454
  • 19 Rand RW. Microneurosurgery. 3rd ed. St Louis: Mosby; 1985
  • 20 Rand RW. Microsurgical anatomy of the brainstem surface facing an acoustic neuroma. Surg Neurol 1987; 27: 403 (Letter)