Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2013; 34(10): 924-930
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1333719
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Repeated-Sprint Performance, Locomotor Profile and Muscle Oxygen Uptake Recovery: Effect of Training Background

P. Ufland
1   University of Picardie, Jules Verne, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Research Laboratory, «Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation», Amiens, France
,
S. Ahmaidi
1   University of Picardie, Jules Verne, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Research Laboratory, «Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation», Amiens, France
,
M. Buchheit
1   University of Picardie, Jules Verne, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Research Laboratory, «Exercise Physiology and Rehabilitation», Amiens, France
2   ASPIRE, Academy for Sports Excellence, Football Performance and Science Department, Doha, Qatar
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 31 December 2012

Publication Date:
05 June 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to examine the respective importance of locomotor profile and muscle oxygen uptake (mV˙  O2) recovery on repeated-sprint ability (RSA) and overall repeated-sprint performance. 11 sprint- (STR) and 10 middle-distance-trained (MDTR) athletes (20.8±4.0 yr) performed an incremental test and a 40-to-50-m sprint to estimate their maximal aerobic (MAS) and sprinting (MSS) speeds. They also performed 6×30-m sprints, departing every 30 s, where mean (RSmean) sprint time was calculated. Muscle oxygenation (Near-infrared spectroscopy, NIRS, [Hbdiff]) was measured for ~ 4 min post test. The mean response time of [Hbdiff]−mV˙  O 2 recovery (monoexponential curve fitting, MRT[Hbdiff]−mV˙  O 2) was calculated. Compared with MDTR, STR presented faster MSS (+11.4±6.7%, with 99% chances to observe a substantially greater value) and RSmean (−3.7±5.4%, 78%), but slower MAS (−15.8±8.0%, 100%) and MRT[Hbdiff]−mV˙  O 2 (+46.2±31.7%, 96%). RSmean was largely correlated with MSS [r=−0.83 (90%CL, −0.92;−0.67)], but neither with MAS [r=−0.12 (−0.47;0.25)] nor MRT[Hbdiff]−mV˙  O 2 [r=−0.27(−0.58;0.11)]. RSmean adjusted for MSS (which indirectly reflects RSA) was largely correlated with both MAS [r=0.51(0.18;0.74)] and MRT[Hbdiff]−mV˙  O 2 [r=0.53(0.20;0.75)]. While a fast mV˙  O 2 recovery is associated with an improved RSA, MSS remains of primary importance for overall repeated-sprint performance (i.e., RSmean).

Key words

near-infrared spectroscopy - multiple sprint work - post-exercise recovery - endurance-training - sprint-training - maximal sprinting speed - maximal aerobic speed
 

  • References

  • 1 Baguet A, Everaert I, Hespel P, Petrovic M, Achten E, Derave W. A new method for non-invasive estimation of human muscle fiber type composition. PLoS One 2011; 6: e21956
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Belardinelli R, Georgiou D, Barstow TJ. Near infrared spectroscopy and changes in skeletal muscle oxygenation during incremental exercise in chronic heart failure: a comparison with healthy subjects. G Ital Cardiol 1995; 25: 715-724
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Bishop D, Edge J, Davis C, Goodman C. Induced metabolic alkalosis affects muscle metabolism and repeated-sprint ability. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2004; 36: 807-813
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Bishop D, Spencer M. Determinants of repeated-sprint ability in well-trained team-sport athletes and endurance-trained athletes. J Sports Med Phys Fitness 2004; 44: 1-7
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Bogdanis GC, Nevill ME, Boobis LH, Lakomy HK. Contribution of phosphocreatine and aerobic metabolism to energy supply during repeated sprint exercise. J Appl Physiol 1996; 80: 876-884
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Buchheit M. Repeated-sprint performance in team sport players: associations with measures of aerobic fitness, metabolic control and locomotor function. Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 230-239
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Buchheit M, Mendez-Villanueva A, Quod M, Quesnel T, Ahmaidi S. Improving acceleration and repeated sprint ability in well-trained adolescent handball players: speed versus sprint interval training. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2010; 5: 152-164
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Buchheit M, Mendez-Villanueva A, Simpson BM, Bourdon PC. Repeated-sprint sequences during youth soccer matches. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 709-716
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Buchheit M, Simpson BM, Peltola E, Mendez-Villanueva A. Assessing maximal sprinting speed in highly trained young soccer players. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2012; 7: 76-78
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Buchheit M, Ufland P. Effect of endurance training on performance and muscle reoxygenation rate during repeated-sprint running. Eur J Appl Physiol 2011; 111: 293-301
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Buchheit M, Ufland P, Haydar B, Laursen PB, Ahmaidi S. Reproducibility and sensitivity of muscle reoxygenation and oxygen uptake recovery kinetics following running exercise in the field. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2011; 31: 337-346
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Callister R, Shealy M, Fleck S, Dudley G. Performance adaptations to sprint, endurance and both modes of training. J Appl Sport Sci Res 1988; 46-51
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Carling C, Le Gall F, Dupont G. Analysis of repeated high-intensity running performance in professional soccer. J Sports Sci 2012; 30: 325-336
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 di Prampero PE, Atchou G, Bruckner JC, Moia C. The energetics of endurance running. Eur J Appl Physiol 1986; 55: 259-266
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Dupont G, McCall A, Prieur F, Millet GP, Berthoin S. Faster oxygen uptake kinetics during recovery is related to better repeated sprinting ability. Eur J Appl Physiol 2010; 110: 627-634
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Girard O, Mendez-Villanueva A, Bishop D. Repeated-sprint ability – part I: factors contributing to fatigue. Sports Med 2011; 41: 673-694
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Glaister M, Stone MH, Stewart AM, Hughes MG, Moir GL. The influence of endurance training on multiple sprint cycling performance. J Strength Cond Res 2007; 21: 606-612
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. Update – ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2011; 32: 819-821
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Helgerud J, Hoydal K, Wang E, Karlsen T, Berg P, Bjerkaas M, Simonsen T, Helgesen C, Hjorth N, Bach R, Hoff J. Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO2max more than moderate training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 665-671
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Hogan MC, Kohin S, Stary CM, Hepple RT. Rapid force recovery in contracting skeletal muscle after brief ischemia is dependent on O(2) availability. J Appl Physiol 1999; 87: 2225-2229
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 3-13
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Johansen L, Quistorff B. 31P-MRS characterization of sprint and endurance trained athletes. Int J Sports Med 2003; 24: 183-189
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Krustrup P, Jones AM, Wilkerson DP, Calbet JA, Bangsbo J. Muscular and pulmonary O2 uptake kinetics during moderate- and high-intensity sub-maximal knee-extensor exercise in humans. J Physiol 2009; 587: 1843-1856
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 Laughlin MH, Roseguini B. Mechanisms for exercise training-induced increases in skeletal muscle blood flow capacity: differences with interval sprint training versus aerobic endurance training. J Physiol Pharmacol 2008; 59 (Suppl. 07) 71-88
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Leger L, Boucher R. An indirect continuous running multistage field test: the Universite de Montreal track test. Can J Appl Sport Sci 1980; 5: 77-84
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Macpherson RE, Hazell TJ, Olver TD, Paterson DH, Lemon PW. Run sprint interval training improves aerobic performance but not maximal cardiac output. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 115-122
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Nagasawa T, Hamaoka T, Sako T, Murakami M, Kime R, Homma T, Ueda C, Ichimura C, Katsumura T. A practical indicator of muscle oxidative capacity determined by recovery of muscle O2 consumption using NIR spectroscopy. Eur J Sports Sci 2003; 3: 1-10
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Oliver JL. Is a fatigue index a worthwhile measure of repeated sprint ability?. J Sci Med Sport 2009; 12: 20-23
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Pyne DB, Saunders PU, Montgomery PG, Hewitt AJ, Sheehan K. Relationships between repeated sprint testing, speed, and endurance. J Strength Cond Res 2008; 22: 1633-1637
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Rumpf MC, Cronin JB, Oliver JL, Hughes M. Assessing youth sprint ability-methodological issues, reliability and performance data. Pediatr Exerc Sci 2011; 23: 442-467
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Spencer M, Bishop D, Dawson B, Goodman C. Physiological and metabolic responses of repeated-sprint activities: specific to field-based team sports. Sports Med 2005; 35: 1025-1044
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Spencer M, Fitzsimons M, Dawson B, Bishop D, Goodman C. Reliability of a repeated-sprint test for field-hockey. J Sci Med Sport 2006; 9: 181-184
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Van Beekvelt MC, Colier WN, Wevers RA, Van Engelen BG. Performance of near-infrared spectroscopy in measuring local O(2) consumption and blood flow in skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 2001; 90: 511-519
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 van Beekvelt MC, van Engelen BG, Wevers RA, Colier WN. In vivo quantitative near-infrared spectroscopy in skeletal muscle during incremental isometric handgrip exercise. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging 2002; 22: 210-217
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar