Quantitative elastography associated with endoscopic ultrasound for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis

Background and study aims: Endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) has become the method of choice for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis in clinical practice. However, the criteria allowing the specific diagnosis of the disease, mainly at non-advanced stages, are still under debate. Analysis of tissue stiffness by quantitative EUS–elastography may provide additional relevant information in this setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the information provided by quantitative EUS–elastography for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis.

Patients and methods: A prospective, consecutive, 1-year study was designed, and included patients who underwent EUS for epigastric pain syndrome or known chronic pancreatitis. EUS–elastography was performed using radial Pentax EUS and Hitachi EUB900. The strain ratio was measured in the head, body, and tail of the pancreas, and the elastographic result was the mean of these three values. EUS criteria of chronic pancreatitis and the Rosemont classification were also evaluated. Data were analyzed by analysis of variance and linear regression; diagnostic accuracy was based on the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.

Results: A total of 191 patients (mean age 52 years, range 21 – 85; 103 male) were included; 92 (48.2 %) of them were finally diagnosed with chronic pancreatitis. A highly significant direct linear correlation was found between the number of EUS criteria of chronic pancreatitis and the strain ratio (r = 0.813; P < 0.0001). The area under the ROC curve was 0.949 (95 % confidence interval 0.916 – 0.982) and the accuracy of EUS–elastography for diagnosing chronic pancreatitis was 91.1 % (cut-off strain ratio of 2.25). The strain ratio varied significantly in different Rosemont classification groups (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: EUS–elastography was an accurate tool for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis and provided relevant and objective information to support EUS findings.

• References

• 1 Domínguez Muñoz JE. Diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: functional testing. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2011; 24: 233-234
• 2 Sandrasegaran K, Lin C, Akisik FM et al. State of the art pancreatic MRI. AJR 2010; 195: 42-53
• 3 Zhang XM, Shi H, Parker L et al. Suspected early or mild chronic pancreatitis: enhancement patterns on gadolinium chelate dynamic MRI. Magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2003; 17: 86-94
• 4 Czakó L. Diagnosis of early-stage chronic pancreatitis by secretin-enhanced magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. J Gastroenterol 2007; 42 (Suppl. 17) 113-117
• 5 Stevens T. Update on the role of endoscopic ultrasound in chronic pancreatitis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2011; 13: 117-122
• 6 Seicean A. Endoscopic ultrasound in chronic pancreatitis: where are we now?. World J Gastroenterol 2010; 16: 4253-4263
• 7 Conwell DL, Banks PA. Chronic pancreatitis. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2008; 24: 586-590
• 8 Wiersema MJ, Hawes RH, Lehman GA et al. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with chronic abdominal pain of suspected pancreatic origin. Endoscopy 1993; 25: 555-564
• 9 Buscail L, Escourrou J, Moreau J et al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in chronic pancreatitis: a comparative prospective study with conventional ultrasonography, computed tomography, and ERCP. Pancreas 1995; 10: 215-217
• 10 Sahai AV, Zimmerman M, Aabakken L et al. Prospective assessment of the ability of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose, exclude, or establish the severity of chronic pancreatitis found by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 18-25
• 11 Catalano MF, Lahotu S, Geenen JE et al. Prospective evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde pancreatography, and secretin test in the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 1998; 48: 11-17
• 12 Kahl S, Glasbrenner B, Leodolter A et al. EUS in the diagnosis of early chronic pancreatitis: a prospective follow-up study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 507-511
• 13 Stevens T, Conwell DL, Zuccaro Jr G et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and endoscopic retrograde pancreatography for the prediction of pancreatic exocrine pancreatic insufficiency. Dig Dis Sci 2008; 53: 1146-1151
• 14 Irisawa A, Katakura K, Ohira H et al. Usefulness of endoscopic ultrasound to diagnose the severity of chronic pancreatitis. J Gastroenterol 2007; 42 (Suppl. 17) 90-94
• 15 Wallace MB, Hawes RH, Durkalski V et al. The reliability of EUS for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: interobserver agreement among experienced endosonographers. Gastrointest Endosc 2001; 53: 294-299
• 16 Stevens T, Lopez R, Adler DG et al. Multicenter comparison of the interobserver agreement of standard EUS scoring and Rosemont classification scoring for diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2010; 71: 519-526
• 17 Catalano MF, Sahai A, Levy M et al. EUS-based criteria for the diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis: the Rosemont classification. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 69: 1251-1261
• 18 Itoh A, Ueno E, Tohno E et al. Breast disease: clinical application of US elastography for diagnosis. Radiology 2006; 239: 341-350
• 19 Cochlin DL, Ganatra RH, Griffiths DFR. Elastography in the detection of prostatic cancer. Clinical Radiol 2002; 57: 1014-1020
• 20 Krouskop TA, Wheeler TM, Kallel F et al. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrason Imaging 1998; 20: 260-274
• 21 Giovannini M, Hookey LC, Bories E et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography: the first step towards virtual biopsy? Preliminary results in 49 patients. Endoscopy 2006; 38: 344-348
• 22 Saftoiu A, Vilman P. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography – a new imaging technique for the visualization of tissue elasticity distribution. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis 2006; 15: 161-165
• 23 Janssen J, Schlörer E, Greiner L. EUS-elastography of the pancreas: feasibility and pattern description of the normal pancreas, chronic pancreatitis, and focal pancreatic lesions. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 65: 971-978
• 24 Hirche TO, Ignee A, Barreiros AP et al. Indications and limitations of endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of focal pancreatic lesions. Endoscopy 2008; 40: 910-917
• 25 Giovannini M, Thomas B, Erwan B et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for evaluation of lymph nodes and pancreatic masses: a multicenter study. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 1587-1593
• 26 Iglesias-Garcia J, Lariño-Noia J, Abdulkader I et al. Endoscopic ultrasound elastography for the characterization of solid pancreatic masses. Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 70: 1101-1108
• 27 Iglesias-Garcia J, Lariño-Noia J, Abdulkader I et al. Quantitative endoscopic ultrasound elastography: an accurate method for the differentiation of solid pancreatic masses. Gastroenterology 2010; 139: 1172-1180
• 28 Varadajulu S, Eltoum I, Tamhane A et al. Histopathologic correlates of noncalcific chronic pancreatitis by EUS: a prospective tissue characterization study. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66: 501-509
• 29 Axon AT, Olassen M, Cotton PB et al. Pancreatography in chronic pancreatitis: international definitions. Gut 1984; 25: 1107-1112
• 30 Calvo MM, Bujanda L, Calderon A et al. Comparison between magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography and ERCP for evaluation of the pancreatic duct. Am J Gastroenterol 2002; 97: 347-353
• 31 Sica GT, Miller FH, Rodriguez G et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with pancreatitis: evaluation of signal intensity and enhancement changes. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002; 15: 275-284
• 32 Frey H. Real-time elastography. A new ultrasound procedure for the reconstruction of tissue elasticity. Radiologie 2003; 43: 850-855
• 33 Havre RF, Elde E, Gilja OH et al. Freehand real-time elastography: impact of scanning parameters on image quality and in vitro intra- and interobserver validations. Ultrasound Med Biol 2008; 34: 1638-1650
• 34 Havre RF, Waage JR, Gilja OH et al. Real-time elastography: strain ratio measurements are influenced by the position of the reference area. Ultraschall Med 10.06.2011; DOI:
• 35 DeWitt J, McGreevy K, LeBlanc J et al. EUS-guided Trucut biopsy of suspected nonfocal chronic pancreatitis. Gastrointest Endosc 2005; 62: 76-84
• 36 Albashir S, Bronner MP, Parsi MA et al. Endoscopic ultrasound, secretin endoscopic pancreatic function test, and histology: correlation in chronic pancreatitis. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105: 2498-2503
• 37 Gao L, Parker KJ, Lerner RM et al. Imaging of the elasticity properties of tissue – a review. Ultrasound Med Biol 1996; 22: 959-977
• 38 Donath MY, Böni-Schwetzler M, Ellingsgaard H et al. Islet inflammation impairs the pancreatic beta-cell in type 2 diabetes. Physiology (Bethesda) 2009; 24: 325-331
• 39 Donath MY, Shoelson SE. Type 2 diabetes as an inflammatory disease. Nat Rev Immunol 2011; 11: 98-107
• 40 Detlefsen S, Sipos B, Feyerabend B et al. Pancreatic fibrosis associated with age and ductal papillary hyperplasia. Virchows Arch 2005; 447: 800-805
• 41 Catalano MF. Diagnosing early-stage chronic pancreatitis: is endoscopic ultrasound a reliable modality?. J Gastroenterol 2007; 42 (Suppl. 17) 78-84
• 42 Hernandez LV, Catalano MF. EUS in the diagnosis of early-stage chronic pancreatitis. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2010; 24: 243-249
• 43 Balci C. MRI assessment of chronic pancreatitis. Diagn Interv Radiol 2011; 17: 249-254
• 44 Balci NC, Smith A, Momtahen AJ et al. MRI and S-MRCP in patients with suspected chronic pancreatitis: correlation with endoscopic pancreatic function testing (ePFT). J Magn Reson Imaging 2010; 31: 601-606
• 45 Iglesias-Garcia J, Abdulkader I, Lariño-Noia J et al. Histological evaluation of chronic pancreatitis by endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy. Gut 2006; 55: 1661-1662
• 46 Iglesias-Garcia J, Lariño-Noia J, Domínguez-Muñoz JE. What is the best method to quantify tissue stiffness by endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) elastography: strain ratio or hue histogram analysis?. Gastroenterology 2011; 140: 764