Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(01): 55-61
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1345140
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Influence of Hard vs. Soft Ground Surfaces on Bone Accretion in Prepubertal Footballers

Authors

  • M. Plaza- Carmona

    1   IGOID Toledo Research Group, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain
  • G. Vicente-Rodriguez

    2   Physiotherapy and Nursing, University of Zaragoza, Huesca, Spain
  • M. Martín-García

    3   GENUD Toledo Research Group, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain
  • P. Burillo

    4   Sports Science Institute, University Camilo Jose Cela, Madrid, Spain
  • J. L. Felipe

    5   Faculty of Sport Sciences, European University of Madrid, Spain
  • E. Mata

    3   GENUD Toledo Research Group, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain
  • J. A. Casajús

    6   Department of Nursery and Physiatry, Zaragoza University, Zaragoza, Spain
  • L. Gallardo

    1   IGOID Toledo Research Group, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain
  • I. Ara

    7   Physical Activity and Sport Sciences, University of Castilla-La Mancha, Toledo, Spain
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf



accepted after revision 05. April 2013

Publikationsdatum:
18. Juni 2013 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Information regarding osteogenic effects of physical activity performed on different playing surfaces is scarce. A total of 42 children (9.2±0.2 years, Tanner stages I–II) participated in this study. 14 were playing on artificial turf soft ground (SG), 14 on a natural non-grass hard ground (HG) and 14 were assigned to the sedentary control group (C). Whole body and hip scans (dual energy X-ray absorptiometry), anthropometric variables (weight and height) and physical fitness (VO2max) were determined in all participants. Bone mineral content (BMC) values were higher in the SG group compared to the C group at the legs (209.75±5.11 g vs. 187.42±5.14 g, respectively), pelvis (122.72±4.27 g vs. 98.58±4.29 g respectively) and whole-body level (1 126.1±22.81 g vs. 1 035.34±22.92 g, respectively). The hard ground (HG) group also showed higher values in the majority of BMC variables compared to the C group. Additionally, bone mineral density (BMD) was significantly higher at all sites of the hip in both active groups compared to control (P<0.05). No differences between HG and SG were found. In summary, similar bone mass accretion is obtained by prepubescent footballers independently of the surface on which they practice football.