Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg 2013; 29(03): 244-252
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1347009
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Mini–Temporal and Perilobular Approach to Facelift: Mini-TAPA-Facelift

Yanko Castro-Govea
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine and University Hospital “Dr. José E. González” Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
,
Oscar De La Garza-Pineda
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine and University Hospital “Dr. José E. González” Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
,
Abel Salazar-Lozano
1   Department of Plastic Surgery, School of Medicine and University Hospital “Dr. José E. González” Monterrey, Nuevo León, Mexico
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
12 June 2013 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background Many people today are looking to preserve their youthful appearance for as long as possible. Current techniques of facial rejuvenation consist of superficial muscular aponeurotic system and/or deep tissue manipulation to relocate the tissues to their former positions. Scars continue to be a limiting factor for many patients who are interested in a facial rejuvenation procedure that has minimal risk and a short recovery period and that truly complies with the term minimally invasive.

Methods This surgical protocol included a complete medical history, analysis of the degree of aging, and development of a surgical plan. We obtained pre- and postoperative photographic controls for medium- and long-term follow-up and evaluation of results.

Results We treated 67 patients with this minimally invasive technique. The follow-up period ranged from 6 months to 4 years. The results were satisfactory, showing a more harmonious facial appearance.

Conclusions The mini–temporal and perilobular approach to facelift (mini-TAPA-facelift) is a facial rejuvenation procedure with limited incisions, which allows us to reaffirm the soft tissues of the corners of the eyelids and upper cheek. It also restores the lower midface and the mandibular contour, thus eliminating undesirable jowls. The procedure clearly defines the face from the neck, providing a high level of satisfaction among patients.

Keywords

minimally invasive plastic surgery - mini-facelift - mini–perilobular approach - mini–temporal approach
 

  • References

  • 1 Rohrich RJ, Pessa JE. The fat compartments of the face: anatomy and clinical implications for cosmetic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 119: 2219-2227 , discussion 2228–2231
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Pessa JE. An algorithm of facial aging: verification of Lambros's theory by three-dimensional stereolithography, with reference to the pathogenesis of midfacial aging, scleral show, and the lateral suborbital trough deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 479-488 , discussion 489–490
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Skoog T. Plastic Surgery: New Methods and Refinements. Philadelphia, PA: Saunders; 1974
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Connell BF. Contouring the neck in rhytidectomy by lipectomy and a muscle sling. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61: 376-383
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Owsley Jr JQ. SMAS-platysma face lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 71: 573-576
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hamra ST. Composite rhytidectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1992; 90: 1-13
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Stuzin JM, Baker TJ, Gordon HL, Baker TM. Extended SMAS dissection as an approach to midface rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 1995; 22: 295-311
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Baker DC. Lateral SMASectomy. Plast Reconstr Surg 1997; 100: 509-513
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Core GB, Vasconez LO, Askren C, Yamamoto Y, Gamboa M. Coronal face-lift with endoscopic techniques. Paper presented at: Plast Surg Forum XV. Washington, DC; September 20-24, 1992:227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Ramirez OM. Endoscopic full facelift. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1994; 18: 363-371
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Knize DM. Limited-incision forehead lift for eyebrow elevation to enhance upper blepharoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 1334-1342
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Fuente del Campo A. Evolution from endoscopic to miniinvasive facelift: a logical progression?. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1998; 22: 267-275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ramirez OM. Fourth-generation subperiosteal approach to the midface: the tridimensional functional cheek lift. Aesthet Surg J 1998; 18: 133-135
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fulton JE, Saylan Z, Helton P , et al. The S-lift facelift featuring the U-suture and O-suture combined with skin resurfacing. Dermatol Surg 2001; 27 (1) 18-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Tonnard P, Verpaele A, Monstrey S , et al. Minimal access cranial suspension lift: a modified S-lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2002; 109: 2074-2086
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Stocchero IN. Shortscar face-lift with the RoundBlock SMAS treatment: a younger face for all. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2007; 31: 275-278
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Ramirez OM. Endoscopic subperiosteal browlift and facelift. Clin Plast Surg 1995; 22: 639-660
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Tellioğlu AT, Tekdemir I, Erdemli EA, Tüccar E, Ulusoy G. Temporoparietal fascia: an anatomic and histologic reinvestigation with new potential clinical applications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105: 40-45
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Knize DM. An anatomically based study of the mechanism of eyebrow ptosis. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 97: 1321-1333
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Seckel BR. Facial Danger Zones: Avoiding Nerve Injury in Facial Plastic Surgery. St. Louis, MO: Quality Medical Publishers; 1994
    Google Scholar
  • 21 Hester Jr TR, Codner MA, McCord CD, Nahai F, Giannopoulos A. Evolution of technique of the direct transblepharoplasty approach for the correction of lower lid and midfacial aging: maximizing results and minimizing complications in a 5-year experience. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 105: 393-406 , discussion 407–408
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Gunter JP, Hackney FL. A simplified transblepharoplasty subperiosteal cheek lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 1999; 103: 2029-2035 , discussion 2036–2041
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Fuente del Campo A, Castro Govea Y. Levantamiento centrofacial por vía trans-palpebral inferior. Cir Plást Iberolatinoam 2001; 27: 37-34
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Ellenbogen R, Karlin JV. Visual criteria for success in restoring the youthful neck. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66: 826-837
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Giampapa VC, Di Bernardo BE. Neck recontouring with suture suspension and liposuction: an alternative for the early rhytidectomy candidate. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1995; 19: 217-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 McKinney P. The management of platysma bands. Plast Reconstr Surg 1996; 98: 999-1006
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Souther SG, Vistnes LM. Medial approximation of the platysma muscle in the treatment of neck deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg 1981; 67: 607-613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 De Castro CC. The anatomy of the platysma muscle. Plast Reconstr Surg 1980; 66 (5) 680-683
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Fuente del Campo A. Midline platysma muscular overlap for neck restoration. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 1710-1714 , discussion 1715
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Millard Jr DR, Garst WP, Beck RL, Thompson ID. Submental and submandibular lipectomy in conjunction with a face lift, in the male or female. Plast Reconstr Surg 1972; 49: 385-391
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Weisman PA. One surgeon's experience with surgical contouring of the neck. Clin Plast Surg 1983; 10: 521-541
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Morganroth GS, Gladstone HB, Neuhaus IM. Complications of facelifting procedures. In: Gloster HM, , ed. Complications in Cutaneous Surgery. New York, NY: Springer; 2008: 224-237
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Shiffman MA. Complications of Facelift. In: Shiffman MA, Mirrafati S, Lam SM, Cueteaux CG, eds. Simplified Facial Rejuvenation. New York, NY: Springer; 2008: 399-401
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Thompson DP, Ashley FL. Face-lift complications: a study of 922 cases performed in a 6-year period. Plast Reconstr Surg 1978; 61: 40-49
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Matarasso A, Elkwood A, Rankin M, Elkowitz M. National plastic surgery survey: face lift techniques and complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2000; 106: 1185-1195 , discussion 1196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Castro-Govea Y, del Campo AF, Chacón-Martínez H, Pérez-Porras S, Vallejo-Estrella RO, Cervantes-Kardasch V. A procedure to prevent cephalic rotation of cartilage grafts in the nasal tip. Aesthet Surg J 2009; 29: 98-105
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Hamra ST. The zygorbicular dissection in composite rhytidectomy: an ideal midface plane. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102: 1646-1657
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Owsley Jr JQ. SMAS-platysma facelift. A bidirectional cervicofacial rhytidectomy. Clin Plast Surg 1983; 10: 429-440
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Mendelson BC. Surgery of the superficial musculoaponeurotic system: principles of release, vectors, and fixation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001; 107: 1545-1552 , discussion 1553–1555, 1556–1557, 1558–1561
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Ventura OM. Rhytidoplasty with short scars: retention ligaments and correction vectors. Cir Plást Iberolatinoam. 2008; 34: 51-60
    PubMedGoogle Scholar