J Knee Surg 2014; 27(02): 113-118
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1353987
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

High-Flexion Mobile-Bearing Knees: Impact on Patellofemoral Outcomes in 159 Patients

Sanjeev Jain
1   Department of Orthopedics, Dr. L. H. Hiranandani Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Sandeep Wasnik
1   Department of Orthopedics, Dr. L. H. Hiranandani Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Chintan Hegde
1   Department of Orthopedics, Dr. L. H. Hiranandani Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
,
Amber Mittal
1   Department of Orthopedics, Dr. L. H. Hiranandani Hospital, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

31 January 2013

01 July 2013

Publication Date:
16 August 2013 (online)

Abstract

Ethnic cultural demands of the patient have encouraged surgeons to use high-flexion designs. It has been speculated that these high-flexion designs may produce higher incidence of patellofemoral complications over conventional designs. We wish to report 5- to 7-year follow-up of this design with special emphasis on patellofemoral outcomes. We performed a prospective study involving 159 patients who underwent computer-assisted simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with high-flexion design. Patients were evaluated clinically using Knee Society score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster University Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score, and Hospital for Special Surgery patella score with a minimum follow-up period of 5 years. At last follow-up, mean scores were KSS (88.7), WOMAC (48.5), and HSS (86.7). All the scores improved postoperatively. Average preoperative range of motion was 108 degrees, which improved to 132 degrees postoperatively. There was no evidence of loosening or spin out in our study. Our study shows that TKA done using high-flexion rotating platform design results in near normal patellofemoral tracking patterns with improvement in function. The level of evidence of the study is IV.

 
  • References

  • 1 Seon JK, Park SJ, Lee KB, Yoon TR, Kozanek M, Song EK. Range of motion in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective comparison of high-flexion and standard cruciate-retaining designs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2009; 91 (3) 672-679
  • 2 Mihalko W, Fishkin Z, Krackow K. Patellofemoral overstuff and its relationship to flexion after total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 449: 283-287
  • 3 Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Mahfouz M, Walker SA, Aubaniac JM, Dennis DA. A high flexion total knee arthroplasty design replicates healthy knee motion. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004; (428) 174-179
  • 4 Maniar RN, Singhi T. High-flex rotating platform knee implants: two- to 6-year results of a prospective study. J Arthroplasty 2012; 27 (4) 598-603
  • 5 Baldini A, Anderson JA, Zampetti P, Pavlov H, Sculco TP. A new patellofemoral scoring system for total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 452: 150-154
  • 6 Weiss JM, Noble PC, Conditt MA , et al. What functional activities are important to patients with knee replacements?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002; 404 (404) 172-188
  • 7 Cho SD, Youm YS, Park KB. Three- to six-year follow-up results after high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: can we allow passive deep knee bending?. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2011; 19 (6) 899-903
  • 8 Huang HT, Su JY, Wang GJ. The early results of high-flex total knee arthroplasty: a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20 (5) 674-679
  • 9 Wilkens KJ, Duong LV, McGarry MH, Kim WC, Lee TQ. Biomechanical effects of kneeling after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007; 89 (12) 2745-2751
  • 10 Nakagawa S, Kadoya Y, Kobayashi A, Tatsumi I, Nishida N, Yamano Y. Kinematics of the patella in deep flexion. Analysis with magnetic resonance imaging. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003; 85-A (7) 1238-1242
  • 11 Stiehl JB, Dennis DA, Komistek RD, Keblish PA. In vivo kinematic analysis of a mobile bearing total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1997; 345 (345) 60-66
  • 12 Sharma A, Leszko F, Komistek RD, Scuderi GR, Cates Jr HE, Liu F. In vivo patellofemoral forces in high flexion total knee arthroplasty. J Biomech 2008; 41 (3) 642-648
  • 13 Jenny JY, Lefèbvre Y, Vernizeau M, Lavaste F, Skalli W. In vitro analysis of the continuous active patellofemoral kinematics of the normal and prosthetic knee [in French]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 2002; 88 (8) 797-802
  • 14 Wen Y, Liu D, Huang Y, Li B. A meta-analysis of the fixed-bearing and mobile-bearing prostheses in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131 (10) 1341-1350
  • 15 Shemshaki H, Dehghani M, Eshaghi MA, Esfahani MF. Fixed versus mobile weight-bearing prosthesis in total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2012; 20 (12) 2519-2527
  • 16 Jacobs W, Anderson P, Limbeek J, Wymenga A. Mobile bearing vs fixed bearing prostheses for total knee arthroplasty for post-operative functional status in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; (2) CD003130
  • 17 Choi WC, Lee S, Seong SC, Jung JH, Lee MC. Comparison between standard and high-flexion posterior-stabilized rotating-platform mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties: a randomized controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010; 92 (16) 2634-2642
  • 18 Gupta SK, Ranawat AS, Shah V, Zikria BA, Zikria JF, Ranawat CS. The P.F.C. sigma RP-F TKA designed for improved performance: a matched-pair study. Orthopedics 2006; 29: (9) (Suppl): S49-S52