Download PDF
Int J Sports Med 2014; 35(11): 916-924
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1363985
Training & Testing
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Effect of Movement Velocity during Resistance Training on Neuromuscular Performance

F. Pareja-Blanco
1   Faculty of Sport, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain
,
D. Rodríguez-Rosell
1   Faculty of Sport, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain
,
L. Sánchez-Medina
2   Studies, Research and Sports Medicine Centre, Instituto Navarro de Deporte y Juventud (INDJ), Pamplona, Spain
,
E. M. Gorostiaga
2   Studies, Research and Sports Medicine Centre, Instituto Navarro de Deporte y Juventud (INDJ), Pamplona, Spain
,
J. J. González-Badillo
1   Faculty of Sport, Pablo de Olavide University, Seville, Spain
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History



accepted after revision 03 December 2013

Publication Date:
02 June 2014 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This study aimed to compare the effect on neuromuscular performance of 2 isoinertial resistance training programs that differed only in actual repetition velocity: maximal intended (MaxV) vs. half-maximal (HalfV) concentric velocity. 21 resistance-trained young men were randomly assigned to a MaxV (n=10) or HalfV (n=11) group and trained for 6 weeks using the full squat exercise. A complementary study (n=8) described the acute metabolic and mechanical response to the protocols used. MaxV training resulted in a likely more beneficial effect than HalfV on squat performance: maximum strength (ES: 0.94 vs. 0.54), velocity developed against all (ES: 1.76 vs. 0.88), light (ES: 1.76 vs. 0.75) and heavy (ES: 2.03 vs. 1.64) loads common to pre- and post-tests, and CMJ height (ES: 0.63 vs. 0.15). The effect on 20-m sprint was unclear, however. Both groups attained the greatest improvements in squat performance at their training velocities. Movement velocity seemed to be of greater importance than time under tension for inducing strength adaptations. Slightly higher metabolic stress (blood lactate and ammonia) and CMJ height loss were found for MaxV vs. HalfV, while metabolite levels were low to moderate for both conditions. MaxV may provide a superior stimulus for inducing adaptations directed towards improving athletic performance.

Key words

full squat - velocity specificity - athletic performance - strength training - lactate - ammonia
 

  • References

  • 1 Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson P, Dyhre-Poulsen P. Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol 2002; 93: 1318-1326
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Almasbakk B, Hoff J. Coordination, the determinant of velocity specificity?. J Appl Physiol 1996; 81: 2046-2052
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Batterham AM, Hopkins WG. Making meaningful inferences about magnitudes. Int J Sports Physiol Perform 2006; 1: 50-57
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Behm DG, Sale DG. Intended rather than actual movement velocity determines velocity-specific training response. J Appl Physiol 1993; 74: 359-368
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Blazevich AJ, Jenkins DG. Effect of the movement speed of resistance training exercises on sprint and strength performance in concurrently training elite junior sprinters. J Sports Sci 2002; 20: 981-990
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Bojsen-Moller J, Magnusson SP, Rasmussen LR, Kjaer M, Aagaard P. Muscle performance during maximal isometric and dynamic contractions is influenced by the stiffness of the tendinous structures. J Appl Physiol 2005; 99: 986-994
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, MI: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988
    Search in Google Scholar
  • 8 Crewther B, Cronin J, Keogh J. Possible stimuli for strength and power adaptation: acute mechanical responses. Sports Med 2005; 35: 967-989
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Cronin J, McNair PJ, Marshall RN. Velocity specificity, combination training and sport specific tasks. J Sci Med Sport 2001; 4: 168-178
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Fielding RA, LeBrasseur NK, Cuoco A, Bean J, Mizer K, Fiatarone Singh MA. High-velocity resistance training increases skeletal muscle peak power in older women. J Am Geriatr Soc 2002; 50: 655-662
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 González-Badillo JJ, Sánchez-Medina L. Movement velocity as a measure of loading intensity in resistance training. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 347-352
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Gorostiaga EM, Navarro-Amezqueta I, Calbet JA, Hellsten Y, Cusso R, Guerrero M, Granados C, Gonzalez-Izal M, Ibañez J, Izquierdo M. Energy metabolism during repeated sets of leg press exercise leading to failure or not. pLoS one 2012; 7: e40621
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Harriss DJ, Atkinson G. 2014 Update – Ethical standards in sport and exercise science research. Int J Sports Med 2013; 34: 1025-1028
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 He ZH, Bottinelli R, Pellegrino MA, Ferenczi MA, Reggiani C. ATP consumption and efficiency of human single muscle fibers with different myosin isoform composition. Biophys J 2000; 79: 945-961
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Hopkins WG. Spreadsheets for analysis of controlled trials, with adjustment for a subject characteristic. Sportscience 2006; 10: 46-50
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Hopkins WG, Marshall SW, Batterham AM, Hanin J. Progressive statistics for studies in sports medicine and exercise science. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 3-13
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Ingebrigtsen J, Holtermann A, Roeleveld K. Effects of load and contraction velocity during three-week biceps curls training on isometric and isokinetic performance. J Strength Cond Res 2009; 23: 1670-1676
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Jackson AS, Pollock ML. Generalized equations for predicting body density of men. Br J Nutr 1978; 40: 497-504
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Jones K, Bishop P, Hunter G, Fleisig G. The effects of varying resistance-training loads on intermediate- and high-velocity-specific adaptations. J Strength Cond Res 2001; 15: 349-356
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Jones K, Hunter G, Fleisig G, Escamilla R, Lemak L. The effects of compensatory acceleration on upper-body strength and power in collegiate football players. J Strength Cond Res 1999; 13: 99-105
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Kanehisa H, Miyashita M. Specificity of velocity in strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol 1983; 52: 104-106
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Kaneko M, Fuchimoto T, Toji H, Suei K. Training effect of different loads on the force-velocity relationship and mechanical power output in human muscle. Scand J Sports Sci 1983; 5: 50-55
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 23 Mazzetti S, Douglass M, Yocum A, Harber M. Effect of explosive versus slow contractions and exercise intensity on energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2007; 39: 1291-1301
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 24 McBride JM, Triplett-McBride T, Davie A, Newton RU. The effect of heavy- vs. light-load jump squats on the development of strength, power, and speed. J Strength Cond Res 2002; 16: 75-82
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 25 Morrissey MC, Harman EA, Frykman PN, Han KH. Early phase differential effects of slow and fast barbell squat training. Am J Sports Med 1998; 26: 221-230
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 26 Munn J, Herbert RD, Hancock MJ, Gandevia SC. Resistance training for strength: effect of number of sets and contraction speed. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2005; 37: 1622-1626
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 27 Padulo J, Mignogna P, Mignardi S, Tonni F, D’Ottavio S. Effect of different pushing speeds on bench press. Int J Sports Med 2012; 33: 376-380
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 28 Palmieri GA. Weight training and repetition speed. J Appl Sports Sci Res 1987; 1: 36-38
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 29 Pereira MI, Gomes PS. Movement velocity in resistance training. Sports Med 2003; 33: 427-438
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 30 Pereira MI, Gomes PS. Effects of isotonic resistance training at two movement velocities on strength gains. Rev Bras Med Esporte 2007; 13: 79-83
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 31 Ratamess NA, Alvar BA, Evetoch TK, Housh TJ, Kibler B, Kraemer WJ, Triplett NT. American College of Sports Medicine position stand. Progression models in resistance training for healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 687-708
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 32 Sánchez-Medina L, González-Badillo JJ. Velocity loss as an indicator of neuromuscular fatigue during resistance training. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2011; 43: 1725-1734
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 33 Sánchez-Medina L, González-Badillo JJ, Pérez CE, Pallarés JG. Velocity- and power-load relationships of the bench pull vs. bench press exercises. Int J Sports Med 2013; in press
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 34 Sánchez-Medina L, Pérez CE, González-Badillo JJ. Importance of the propulsive phase in strength assessment. Int J Sports Med 2010; 31: 123-129
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 35 Sayers SP, Gibson K. A comparison of high-speed power training and traditional slow-speed resistance training in older men and women. J Strength Cond Res 2010; 24: 3369-3380
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 36 Schilling BK, Falvo MJ, Chiu LZ. Force-velocity, impulse-momentum relationships: Implications for efficacy of purposefully slow resistance training. J Sports Sci Med 2008; 7: 299-304
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 37 Toigo M, Boutellier U. New fundamental resistance exercise determinants of molecular and cellular muscle adaptations. Eur J Appl Physiol 2006; 97: 643-663
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 38 Tupling R, Green H, Grant S, Burnett M, Ranney D. Postcontractile force depression in humans is associated with an impairment in SR Ca(2+) pump function. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 2000; 278: R87-R94
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 39 Van Cutsem M, Duchateau J, Hainaut K. Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans. Am J Physiol 1998; 513: 295-305
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 40 Young WB, Bilby GE. The effect of voluntary effort to influence speed of contraction on strength, muscular power, and hypertrophy development. J Strength Cond Res 1993; 7: 172-178
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar