Download PDF
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2015; 63(02): 168-174
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1376890
Original Cardiovascular
Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Long-Term Performance of the Bovine Pericardium Patch in Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy

Bernhard Dorweiler
1   Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
*   Both authors contributed equally to this work.
,
Charlotte Kayser
1   Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
*   Both authors contributed equally to this work.
,
Frauke Zipp
2   Department of Neurology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
,
Klaus Gröschel
2   Department of Neurology, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
,
Christian-Friedrich Vahl
1   Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center, Mainz, Germany
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

04 January 2014

04 March 2014

Publication Date:
25 June 2014 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints All articles of this category

Abstract

Objective The aim of the study was to analyze long-term results of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using bovine pericardium patch.

Patients and Methods This study is a retrospective analysis of 274 consecutive cases (173 in CEA group and 101 patients in an internal control group of eversion endarterectomy [EEA]) operated between January 2005 and May 2007. Operations were performed according to standard surgical technique. Primary endpoints of the study were 30-day mortality, ipsilateral neurologic event rate, and high-grade restenosis in the long-term follow-up.

Results No statistically significance between both groups was found in terms of gender, age, risk factors, medication (statine, platelet inhibition), and incidence of symptomatic stenoses (50.9 vs. 50.5%, n.s.). Early mortality was 0% for EEA and 1% for CEA (nonsignificant [n.s.]) and neurologic event rate (transitory ischemic attack [TIA] + stroke) was 4 versus 4% (n.s.), respectively. After 5 years of follow-up (mean 81 months for CEA and 73 months for EEA), the rate of severe (> 70%) restenosis was 2.9% for EEA and 2.7% for CEA (p =0.729).

Conclusion Bovine pericardium patch yielded promising results with regard to mortality, perioperative neurologic event rate (TIA, stroke), and occurrence of severe restenosis after 5 years of follow-up.

Keywords

carotid stenosis - carotid endarterectomy - patch closure
 

  • References

  • 1 Eckstein HH, Ringleb P, Allenberg JR , et al. Results of the Stent-Protected Angioplasty versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE) study to treat symptomatic stenoses at 2 years: a multinational, prospective, randomised trial. Lancet Neurol 2008; 7 (10) 893-902
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 2 Rothwell PM, Eliasziw M, Gutnikov SA , et al; Carotid Endarterectomy Trialists' Collaboration. Analysis of pooled data from the randomised controlled trials of endarterectomy for symptomatic carotid stenosis. Lancet 2003; 361 (9352) 107-116
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 3 Chambers BR, Donnan GA. Carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; (4) CD001923
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 4 Halliday A, Harrison M, Hayter E , et al; Asymptomatic Carotid Surgery Trial (ACST) Collaborative Group. 10-year stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1): a multicentre randomised trial. Lancet 2010; 376 (9746) 1074-1084
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 5 Cao P, De Rango P, Cieri E, Giordano G. Eversion versus conventional endarterectomy. Semin Vasc Surg 2004; 17 (3) 236-242
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 6 Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Patch angioplasty versus primary closure for carotid endarterectomy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009; (4) CD000160
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 7 Rerkasem K, Rothwell PM. Patches of different types for carotid patch angioplasty. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; (3) CD000071
    PubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 8 Biasi GM, Mingazzini P, Baronio L, Sampaolo A. Processed bovine pericardium as patch angioplasty for carotid endarterectomy: a preliminary report. Cardiovasc Surg 1996; 4 (6) 848-852
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 9 Biasi GM, Sternjakob S, Mingazzini PM, Ferrari SA. Nine-year experience of bovine pericardium patch angioplasty during carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2002; 36 (2) 271-277
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 10 Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M , et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1998; 339 (20) 1415-1425
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 11 Arning C, Widder B, von Reutern GM, Stiegler H, Görtler M. Revision of DEGUM ultrasound criteria for grading internal carotid artery stenoses and transfer to NASCET measurement [in German]. Ultraschall Med 2010; 31 (3) 251-257
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 12 Brott TG, Halperin JL, Abbara S , et al; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Stroke Association; American Association of Neurological Surgeons; American College of Radiology; American Society of Neuroradiology; Congress of Neurological Surgeons; Society of Atherosclerosis Imaging and Prevention; Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions; Society of Interventional Radiology; Society of NeuroInterventional Surgery; Society for Vascular Medicine; Society for Vascular Surgery. Guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: executive summary. Circulation 2011; 124 (4) e145
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 13 Moore WS, Young B, Baker WH , et al; The ACAS Investigators. Surgical results: a justification of the surgeon selection process for the ACAS trial. J Vasc Surg 1996; 23 (2) 323-328
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 14 Ho KJ, Nguyen LL, Menard MT. Intermediate-term outcome of carotid endarterectomy with bovine pericardial patch closure compared with Dacron patch and primary closure. J Vasc Surg 2012; 55 (3) 708-714
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 15 Matsagas MI, Bali C, Arnaoutoglou E , et al. Carotid endarterectomy with bovine pericardium patch angioplasty: mid-term results. Ann Vasc Surg 2006; 20 (5) 614-619
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 16 Ladowski JM, Ladowski JS. Retrospective analysis of bovine pericardium (Vascu-Guard) for patch closure in carotid endarterectomies. Ann Vasc Surg 2011; 25 (5) 646-650
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 17 Cao P, Giordano G, De Rango P , et al. Eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy: late results of a prospective multicenter randomized trial. J Vasc Surg 2000; 31 (1, Pt 1): 19-30
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 18 Crawford RS, Chung TK, Hodgman T, Pedraza JD, Corey M, Cambria RP. Restenosis after eversion vs patch closure carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2007; 46 (1) 41-48
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 19 Demirel S, Attigah N, Bruijnen H , et al; SPACE Investigators. Multicenter experience on eversion versus conventional carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: observations from the Stent-Protected Angioplasty Versus Carotid Endarterectomy (SPACE-1) trial. Stroke 2012; 43 (7) 1865-1871
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 20 Cao P, Giordano G, De Rango P , et al. A randomized study on eversion versus standard carotid endarterectomy: study design and preliminary results: the Everest Trial. J Vasc Surg 1998; 27 (4) 595-605
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 21 Antoniou GA, Kuhan G, Sfyroeras GS , et al. Contralateral occlusion of the internal carotid artery increases the risk of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 2013; 57 (4) 1134-1145
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar
  • 22 Li X, Guo Y, Ziegler KR , et al. Current usage and future directions for the bovine pericardial patch. Ann Vasc Surg 2011; 25 (4) 561-568
    CrossrefPubMedSearch in Google Scholar