Download PDF
Psychiatr Prax 2015; 42(S 01): S4-S8
DOI: 10.1055/s-0034-1387656
Originalarbeit
© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

psychenet – das Hamburger Netz psychische Gesundheit

psychenet – The Hamburg Network for Mental Health
Martin Härter
1   Institut und Poliklinik für Medizinische Psychologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
,
Andreas Brandes
2   Gesundheitswirtschaft Hamburg GmbH
,
Bernd Hillebrandt
2   Gesundheitswirtschaft Hamburg GmbH
,
Martin Lambert
3   Arbeitsbereich Psychosen, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
02 July 2015 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

psychenet – das Hamburger Netz psychische Gesundheit gehört zu denjenigen Regionen, die im Rahmen der Ausschreibung „Gesundheitsregionen der Zukunft“ des Bundesministeriums für Bildung und Forschung von 2011 – 2015 gefördert werden. Der in der Hamburger Region mit über 100 institutionellen Partnern und über 190 Praxen organisierte Versorgungs- und Forschungsverbund psychenet hat zum Ziel, die psychische Gesundheit der Hamburger Bevölkerung im Rahmen von 5 Aktionsfeldern und 11 Teilprojekten zu verbessern.

Abstract

With the research and development project psychenet: the Hamburg Network for Mental Health (2011 – 2015), the Federal Ministry of Education and Research contributes to strengthening healthcare regions in Germany by establishing new transsectoral cooperations and implementing evaluated innovations. More than 300 partners from research, health care, health industry and government in the Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg are promoting innovative measures to improve the detection, diagnosis, and treatment for mental disorders. The main objective is to implement integrated healthcare networks based on evidence for effective treatment methods, deriving from high-quality research throughout five indications such as psychosis, depression, somatoform and functional syndromes, anorexia and bulimia and addiction illnesses in adolescence. Those networks are accompanied by additional measures, for example, for improving awareness, information and education for mental health, addressing occupational health or strengthening the participation of patients and their families suffering from mental illness.

Schlüsselwörter

psychische Gesundheit - Früherkennung - integrierte Versorgung - Versorgungsforschung - psychenet

Keywords

mental health - early detection - integrated care - health care research - psychenet
 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Steel Z, Marnane C, Iranpour C et al. The global prevalence of common mental disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis 1980-2013. Int J Epidemiol 2014; 43: 476-493
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Merikangas KR, He JP, Burstein M et al. Lifetime prevalence of mental disorders in U.S. adolescents: results from the National Comorbidity Survey Replication – Adolescent Supplement (NCS-A). J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2010; 49: 980-989
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Wittchen HU, Jacobi F, Rehm J et al. The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2011; 21: 655-679
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Delespaul PH. de consensusgroep EPA. Consensus regarding the definition of persons with severe mental illness and the number of such persons in the Netherlands. Tijdschr Psychiatr 2013; 55: 427-438
    Google Scholar
  • 5 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality. Results from the 2012 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: Mental Health Findings. Im Internet: http://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/prevalence/serious-mental-illness-smi-among-us-adults.shtml (Stand: 1.10.2012)
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Kessler RC, Berglund P, Demler O et al. Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 593-602
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Wang PS, Angermeyer M, Borges G et al. Delay and failure in treatment seeking after first onset of mental disorders in the World Health Organization’s World Mental Health Survey Initiative. World Psychiatry 2007; 6: 177-185
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Alonso J, Angermeyer MC, Bernert S et al. ESEMeD/MHEDEA 2000 Investigators, European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) Project. Use of mental health services in Europe: results from the European Study of the Epidemiology of Mental Disorders (ESEMeD) project. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl 2004; 109: 47-54
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Burgess PM, Pirkis JE, Slade TN et al. Service use for mental health problems: findings from the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2009; 43: 615-623
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Thornicroft G. Most people with mental illness are not treated. Lancet 2007; 370: 807-808
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wang PS, Berglund P, Olfson M et al. Failure and delay in initial treatment contact after first onset of mental disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005; 62: 603-613
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Lambert M, Bock T, Naber D et al. Mental Health of Children, Adolescents and Young Adults – Part 1: Prevalence, Illness Persistence, Adversities, Service use, Treatment Delay and Consequences. Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr 2013; 81: 614-627
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Vos T, Flaxman AD, Naghavi M et al. Years lived with disability (YLDs) for 1160 sequelae of 289 diseases and injuries 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet 2012; 380: 2163-2196
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Kessler RC, Avenevoli S, Costello EJ et al. Prevalence, persistence, and sociodemographic correlates of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Adolescent Supplement. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2012; 69: 372-380
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Andrews G, Issakidis C, Sanderson K et al. Utilising survey data to inform public policy: comparison of the cost-effectiveness of treatment of ten mental disorders. Br J Psychiatry 2004; 184: 526-533
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Gustavsson A, Svensson M, Jacobi F et al. Cost of disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol 2011; 21: 718-779
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Olesen J, Gustavsson A, Svensson M et al. The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe. Eur J Neurol 2012; 19: 155-162
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Statista. Direkte Kosten psychischer Erkrankungen in Deutschland nach Krankheitsart in den Jahren 2002 bis 2012 (in Milliarden Euro). Im Internet: http://de.statista.com/statistik/daten/studie/246590/umfrage/direkte-kosten-psychischer-erkrankungen-in-deutschland-nach-krankheitsart/ (Stand: 07.04.2015)
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Kamp L, Pickshaus K Hrsg. Regelungslücke psychische Belastungen schließen. Düsseldorf: Hans Böckler Stiftung, IG Metall; 2011
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Härter M, Kentgens M, Brandes A et al. Rationale and content of psychenet: the Hamburg Network for Mental Health. Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2012; 262 (Suppl. 02) 57-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Lambert M, Bock T, Daubmann A et al. The Hamburg-model of integrated care for patients with psychosis: Part 1. Rationale, treatment concept and results of the pre-study. Psychiat Prax 2014; 41: 257-265
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Karow A, Bock T, Daubmann A et al. The Hamburg-model of integrated care for patients with psychosis: Part 2. Results of the clinical course over 2- and 4-years of treatment. Psychiat Prax 2014; 41: 266-273
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar